The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)
Abstract
Background Effective treatment requires regular follow-up and monitoring of symptoms. We investigated sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7).Methods This study included all participants from a multisite trial of chronic depression. Baseline and follow-up (12 and 48 weeks) data were used to assess treatment response. Effect sizes (ES) and standardized response means (SRM) of pre- and post-GAD-7 mean changes were calculated for subgroups of patients, who did or did not improve according to ratings in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24).Results N = 261 patients were included in the analyses. In the subgroup of patients who improved according to HRSD-24, GAD-7 scores were significantly lower after 12 weeks (t = -6.31, df = 120, p < .001; ES = -0.51, SRM = -0.57), and 48 weeks of treatment (t = -12.68, df = 141, p < .001; ES = -1.0, SRM = -1.7), when compared to admission. In the group who worsened, GAD-7 scores were significantly higher after 12 weeks (t = 2.96, df = 41, p = .005; ES = 0.30, SRM = 0.46), and increased after 48 weeks (t = 1.99, df = 21, p = .059; ES = 0.37, SRM = 0.43), when compared to baseline. The unchanged group showed no significant difference between baseline and follow-up. MCID was estimated 4 points on the GAD-7 total score.Limitations Confirmation of these findings and further investigation of the GAD-7 in populations and trials focusing on anxiety-specific treatment is highly recommended.Conclusions Results show that the GAD-7 is sensitive to detect change in psychopathology over the course of treatment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The minimal clinically important difference for GAD-7 was 3.8; the clinically relevant change was ≥4 points [51].”
From Clinical Efficacy and Psychological Mechanisms of an App-Based Digital Therapeutic for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“This change met the level of minimal clinical important difference (MCID), which is estimated at 4 points on the GAD-7 total score [30].”
From The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“which is estimated at 4 points on the GAD-7 total score [30].”
From The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Anxiety will be measured with the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7; range, 0–21; higher scores indicate greater severity) [25].”
In the citing paper
“As noted above, we observed clinically meaningful improvements in both anxiety and depression, with reductions in GAD-7 (− 5.04) and PHQ-9 (− 5.64) higher than the MCID for both conditions (3.8 and 5, respectively) [66, 67].”
From Telerehabilitation of acute musculoskeletal multi-disorders: prospective, single-arm, interventional study (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765
Self-citationKessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · Cited by 20,391
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM)
Leong, F. T. L. (2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412963978.n182 · Cited by 10,861
Lakens, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 · Cited by 10,303
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness
Hamilton, M. (1967) · British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x · Cited by 8,410
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R., Rush, A. J., Walters, E. E., & Wang, P. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3095 · Cited by 7,988
Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Monahan, P. O., & Löwe, B. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004 · Cited by 4,741
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- First, 2002, Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P)
- Schuck, 2000, Z. Med. Psychol, 9, 125
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China
Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934 · Cited by 5,843
Sun, J., Liang, K., Chi, X., & Chen, S. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9121709 · Cited by 310
“The GAD-7 has gradually become a widely used measurement tool in populations with different characteristics, especially adult populations, and showed satisfactory reliability and validity [17,18].”
BackgroundMethodAlzueta, E., Perrin, P. B., Baker, F. C., Caffarra, S., Ramos‐Usuga, D., Yüksel, D., & Arango‐Lasprilla, J. C. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23082 · Cited by 282
Validation of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale in a US College Sample
Perz, C. A., Lang, B., & Harrington, R. (2020) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00356-3 · Cited by 251
Psilocybin for treatment resistant depression in patients taking a concomitant SSRI medication
Goodwin, G. M., Croal, M., Feifel, D., Kelly, J. R., Marwood, L., Mistry, S., O’Keane, V., Peck, S. K., Simmons, H., Sisa, C., et al. (2023) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-023-01648-7 · Cited by 187
“90) by Week 3, which is considered a clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms [41].”
BackgroundThe mental health of health care workers in Oman during the COVID-19 pandemic
Badahdah, A. M., Khamis, F. A., Mahyijari, N. A., Balushi, M. A., Hatmi, H. A., Salmi, I. A., Albulushi, Z., & Al-Noomani, J. (2020) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0020764020939596 · Cited by 177
“The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) is a 7-item retrospective self-report screening tool for generalized anxiety disorder and one of the most commonly used scales to gauge anxiety in both research and clinical settings (Beard & Björgvinsson, 2014; Toussaint et al., 2020).”
MethodRobillard, R., Dion, K., Pennestri, M., Solomonova, E., Lee, E. K., Saad, M., Murkar, A., Godbout, R., Edwards, J. D., Quilty, L. C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.13231 · Cited by 164
“…based on previously established thresholds: difference of at least three points on the PSQI (Hughes et al., 2009); 28.0% change on the PSS (Eskildsen et al., 2015); difference of at least four points on the GAD-7 (Toussaint et al., 2020); and a 28.5% change on the QIDS-SR16 (Masson & Tejani, 2013).”
MethodInfluentialImpact of COVID‐19 on Psychology among the University Students
Dhar, B. K., Ayittey, F. K., & Sarkar, S. M. (2020) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.202000038 · Cited by 161
Singh, K., Kondal, D., Mohan, S., Jaganathan, S., Deepa, M., Venkateshmurthy, N. S., Jarhyan, P., Anjana, R. M., Narayan, K. M. V., Mohan, V., et al. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10708-w · Cited by 158
Batterham, P. J., Calear, A. L., McCallum, S. M., Morse, A. R., Banfield, M., Farrer, L. M., Gulliver, A., Cherbuin, N., Harris, R. M. R., Shou, Y., et al. (2021) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja2.51043 · Cited by 129
Robillard, R., Daros, A. R., Phillips, J. L., Porteous, M., Saad, M., Pennestri, M.-H., Kendzerska, T., Edwards, J. D., Solomonova, E., Bhatla, R., et al. (2021) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743720986786 · Cited by 112
Factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare providers in 23 countries
Leigh, J. P., Moss, S. J., White, T. M., Picchio, C. A., Rabin, K. H., Ratzan, S. C., Wyka, K., El-Mohandes, A. A. E., & Lazarus, J. V. (2022) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.097 · Cited by 107
“In addition, the survey collected: 3) experience of anxiety (q21) and depression (q22) (moderate; 3–4 days per week, or most or all of the time; 5–7 days) [22]; 4) COVID-19 experience (self or a family member became ill with COVID-19 (q19), lost a family member to COVID-19 (q20)); 5) demographic variables (age, gender…”
BackgroundEssangri, H., Sabir, M., Benkabbou, A., Majbar, M. A., Amrani, L., Ghannam, A., Lekehal, B., Mohsine, R., & Souadka, A. (2021) · The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-1302 · Cited by 100
“The GAD-7 includes seven items based on seven core symptomsand inquires the frequencywithwhich respondents suffered from these symptoms within the last 2 weeks.(24) Respondents report their symptoms using a four-item Likert rating scale ranging from zero (not at all) to three (almost every day).”
MethodBekelman, D. B., Feser, W. J., Morgan, B. R., Welsh, C. H., Parsons, E. C., Paden, G., Barón, A. E., Hattler, B. G. J., McBryde, C. F., Cheng, A. M., et al. (2024) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.24035 · Cited by 102
Bourion-Bédès, S., Tarquinio, C., Batt, M., Tarquinio, P., Lebreuilly, R., Sorsana, C., Legrand, K., Rousseau, H., & Baumann, C. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113559 · Cited by 89
Luo, X., Zheng, R., Xiao, P., Xie, X., Liu, Q., Zhu, K., Wu, X., Xiang, Z., & Song, R. (2022) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103043 · Cited by 98
Pan, X., Xiao, Y., Ren, D., Xu, Z., Zhang, Q., Yang, L., Liu, F., Hao, Y., Zhao, F., & Bai, Y. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/appy.12427 · Cited by 79
“Consistent with a study by Toussaint, a GAD-7 score ≥ 5 was considered to indicate the existence of anxiety symptoms (Toussaint et al., 2020).”
ResultHuang, Y., Wang, Y., Zeng, L., Yang, J., Song, X., Rao, W., Li, H., Ning, Y., He, H., Li, T., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.568329 · Cited by 78
“These self-reported scales have good reliability and validity for measuring psychological status (11, 22, 23).”
BackgroundBhatia, A., Kara, J., Janmohamed, T., Prabhu, A., Lebovic, G., Katz, J., & Clarke, H. (2021) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/26528 · Cited by 73
“These reductions have clinical significance, given that the minimum clinically important difference in values for the GAD-7 and PCS (–4 for GAD-7 [50] and 38% for PCS [51]) is within the 95% confidence interval of the outcome reduction.”
BackgroundInfluentialVan Lieshout, R. J., Layton, H., Savoy, C. D., Brown, J. S. L., Ferro, M. A., Streiner, D. L., Bieling, P. J., Feller, A., & Hanna, S. (2021) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2488 · Cited by 73
Hornstein, S., Forman‐Hoffman, V. L., Nazander, A., Ranta, K., & Hilbert, K. (2021) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076211060659 · Cited by 87
“30,31 This dichotomization of the outcome was chosen to align with past approaches that also classi fi ed outcomes.”
MethodXu, W., Lin, L., Ding, K., Ke, Y.-F., Huang, J.-H., Hou, C., Jia, F., & Wang, S. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.063 · Cited by 72
Predictors of Anxiety in the COVID-19 Pandemic from a Global Perspective: Data from 23 Countries
Burkova, V. N., Butovskaya, M., Randall, A. K., Fedenok, J. N., Ahmadi, K., AlGhraibeh, A. M. A., Allami, F. B. M., Alpaslan, F. S., Al-Zu’bi, M. A. A., Biçer, D. F., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13074017 · Cited by 70
“The increase in anxiety has resulted in an increase of both physical and psychological symptoms, such as feeling nervous, fearful, tense palpitations, hyperventilation and rapid breathing [20,21].”
Elhadi, M., Buzreg, A., Bouhuwaish, A. E. M., Khaled, A., Alhadi, A., Msherghi, A. A. A., Alsoufi, A., Alameen, H., Biala, M. I., Elgherwi, A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570435 · Cited by 64
Wu, J., Huang, Z., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Pan, Z., & Gu, Y. (2021) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-021-01916-2 · Cited by 66
Verduzco-Aguirre, H. C., Babu, D. S., Mohile, S. G., Bautista, J., Xu, H., Culakova, E., Canin, B. E., Zhang, Y., Wells, M., Epstein, R. M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.012 · Cited by 55
“(21) Based on prior studies, minimal clinically important differences (MCID) were 3 points, 4-5 points, 2 points, 4-7 points and 1-2 points respectively for GAD-7, GDS-15, Distress Thermometer, FACT-G, and emotional well-being.(22-25)”
MethodResultHirsch, C. R., Krahé, C., Whyte, J., Krzyzanowski, H., Meeten, F., Norton, S., & Mathews, A. (2021) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000660 · Cited by 60
International consensus on patient-centred outcomes in eating disorders
Austin, A., de Silva, U., Ilesanmi, C., Likitabhorn, T., Miller, I., Fialho, M. D. L. S., Austin, S. B., Caldwell, B., Chew, C. S. E., Chua, S. N., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00265-1 · Cited by 55
Nonpharmacological management of psychological distress in people with COPD
Volpato, E., Farver-Vestergaard, I., Brighton, L. J., Peters, J. B., Verkleij, M., Hutchinson, A., Heijmans, M., & von Leupoldt, A. (2023) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0170-2022 · Cited by 53
Rifkin-Zybutz, R. P., Erridge, S., Holvey, C., Coomber, R., Gaffney, J., Lawn, W., Barros, D. A. R., Bhoskar, U., Mwimba, G., Praveen, K., et al. (2023) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-023-06399-3 · Cited by 53
“GAD-7 has been shown to be sensitive to change with a minimally clinically significant difference of 4 (Toussaint et al. 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe effect of anxiety on thriving levels of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic
Şahin, S., & Tuna, R. (2021) · Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia · doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2021.10.004 · Cited by 52
Patient-reported outcomes for people with diabetes: what and how to measure? A narrative review
Terwee, C. B., Elders, P. J. M., Blom, M. T., Beulens, J. W. J., Rolandsson, O., Rogge, A. A., Rose, M., Harman, N., Williamson, P. R., Pouwer, F., et al. (2023) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-023-05926-3 · Cited by 54
Bentley, K. H., Sakurai, H., Lowman, K. L., Rines-Toth, L., McKowen, J. W., Pedrelli, P., Evins, A. E., & Yule, A. M. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.005 · Cited by 53
“, 2006) are brief, widely-used self-report screening tools for depression and anxiety (Dear et al., 2011; Titov et al., 2011; Toussaint et al., 2020; Zimmerman, 2019).”
MethodGraziano, S., Boldrini, F., Righelli, D., Milo, F., Lucidi, V., Quittner, A. L., & Tabarini, P. (2021) · Pediatric Pulmonology · doi:10.1002/ppul.25413 · Cited by 49
“The MID score of 4 points, in either direction, has been established as a clinically meaningful change.(26) The Italian version of this instrument was used.”
MethodMinhas, M., Belisario, K. L., González‐Roz, A., Halladay, J. E., Murphy, J. G., & MacKillop, J. M. (2021) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.14624 · Cited by 49
Su, Y., Wang, S., Zheng, H., Tan, W., Li, X., Huang, Z., Hou, C., & Jia, F. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.047 · Cited by 47
DeGraba, T. J., Williams, K., Koffman, R. L., Bell, J. L., Pettit, W., Kelly, J. P., Dittmer, T. A., Nussbaum, G. F., Grammer, G. G., Bleiberg, J., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.580182 · Cited by 55
Popescu, C., Golden, G. M., Benrimoh, D. A., Tanguay-Sela, M., Slowey, D., Lundrigan, E., Williams, J. D., Desormeau, B., Kardani, D., Pérez, T., et al. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/31862 · Cited by 44
“Patients identified other clinical comorbidities, such as migraines (2/14, 14% of patients) and anxiety disorders (7/14, 50% of patients), which are described in detail in Multimedia Appendix 1 [10,11,20,25-32], Table S2.”
BackgroundRoy, A., Hoge, E. A., Abrante, P., Druker, S., Liu, T., & Brewer, J. A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26987 · Cited by 41
Chang, Y., Jiang, X., Dou, J., Xie, R., Zhao, W., Cao, Y., Gao, J., Yao, F., Wu, D., Mei, H., et al. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135814 · Cited by 40
Robison, R., Lafrance, A., Brendle, M., Smith, M., Moore, C., Ahuja, S., Richards, S., Hawkins, N., & Strahan, E. (2022) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-022-00588-9 · Cited by 36
“The minimal clinically significant change on the GAD-7 was defined as a 4-point change [35].”
MethodCosta, F., Janela, D., Molinos, M., Lains, J., Francisco, G. E., Bento, V., & Dias Correia, F. (2022) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04891-5 · Cited by 35
Biswas, S., & Biswas, A. (2021) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-020-01431-8 · Cited by 35
Mao, F., Sun, Y., Wang, J., Huang, Y., Lu, Y., & Cao, F. (2021) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102873 · Cited by 36
Behm, A. C., Hüsing, P., Löwe, B., & Toussaint, A. C. (2021) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152265 · Cited by 34
Self-citationFisher, K., Markle‐Reid, M., Ploeg, J., Bartholomew, A., Griffith, L. E., Gafni, A., Thabane, L., & Yous, M. (2020) · Journal of Comorbidity · doi:10.1177/2235042x20963390 · Cited by 39
Gupta, M., Malik, T., & Sinha, C. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/36910 · Cited by 37
“Clinically meaningful effect size is defined as at least 4.0 points for the GAD-7 [78].”
BackgroundInfluentialSpiller, T. R., Méan, M., Ernst, J., Sazpinar, O., Gehrke, S., Paolercio, F., Petry, H., Pfaltz, M. C., Morina, N., Aebischer, O., et al. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003128 · Cited by 31
“The minimal clinically important difference was defined as four points for the GAD-7 (Toussaint et al., 2020) and as five points for the PHQ-9 (Löwe, Unützer, Callahan, Perkins, & Kroenke, 2004).”
MethodInfluentialBryant, R. A., Dawson, K. S., Keyan, D., Azevedo, S., Yadav, S., Tran, J., Rawson, N., & Harvey, S. B. (2021) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000520283 · Cited by 31
Fleming, M., Smejka, T., Macey, E., Luengo-Fernandez, R., Henry, A., Robinson, B., Kyle, S., Espie, C., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1111/jsr.13971 · Cited by 32
“Mean (standard deviation) days between assessments did not differ between groups TABLE 2 ITT analysis of primary outcome (SCI-8 post-intervention) follow-up (PHQ-9: 32% versus 15%, χ 2 [1] = 2.73, p = 0.099; GAD-7: 35% versus 15%, χ 2 [1] = 3.588, p = 0.058).”
BackgroundInfluentialKerber, A., Beintner, I., Burchert, S., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2023) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/45068 · Cited by 34
Benjet, C. L., Albor, Y., Alvis–Barranco, L., Contreras‐Ibáñez, C. C., Montoya, G. P. C., Cudris–Torres, L., González, N., Morelos, J. C., Gutiérrez–García, R. A., Medina‐Mora, M. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000846 · Cited by 37
Palmer, C. E., Marshall, E., Millgate, E., Warren, G., Ewbank, M., Cooper, E., Lawes, S., Bouazzaoui, M., Smith, A., Hutchins-Joss, C., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/69351 · Cited by 45
“The threshold for a clinically meaningful reduction in symptoms was defined as a change greater than the reliable change index of the GAD-7 scale (minimum of a 4-point reduction) [54].”
Arts on prescription: observed changes in anxiety, depression, and well-being across referral cycles
Sumner, R. C., Crone, D., Hughes, S., & James, D. V. B. (2021) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.12.008 · Cited by 30
MacKinnon, A., Simpson, K. M., Salisbury, M. R., Bobula, J., Penner‐Goeke, L., Berard, L. D. H., Rioux, C., Giesbrecht, G. F., Giuliano, R. J., Lebel, C. A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.880972 · Cited by 38
“Anxiety was measured using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD7), where scores ≥10 indicate clinically significant symptoms (53), and a 4 point reduction represents clinically significant change (54).”
MethodNetwork structure of mobile phone addiction and anxiety symptoms among rural Chinese adolescents
Wang, J., Luo, Y., Yan, N., Wang, Y., Shiferaw, B. D., Tang, J., Pei, Y., Chen, Q., Zhu, Y., & Wang, W. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-04971-x · Cited by 29
“Abbreviations MPAI Mobile Phone Addiction Index scale GAD-7 The Chinese version of the seven-item Generalized Anxiety Inventory PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale SD Standard Deviation Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi. org/10.1186/s12888-023-0…”
MethodInfluentialLee, C., Round, J. M., Hanlon, J. G., Hyshka, E., Dyck, J. R. B., & Eurich, D. T. (2021) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437211043393 · Cited by 32
Lieshout, R. J. V., Layton, H., Savoy, C. D., Xie, F., Brown, J. S. L., Huh, K., Bieling, P., Streiner, D. L., Ferro, M. A., & Haber, E. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291723000454 · Cited by 27
“In accordance with previous research, ⩾ 4 point change in GAD-7 score was defined as clinically significant (Toussaint et al., 2020).”
MethodPsychosocial Consequences of Hand Eczema—A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study
Zalewski, A., Krajewski, P. K., & Szepietowski, J. C. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12175741 · Cited by 27
The Differential Role of Coping, Physical Activity, and Mindfulness in College Student Adjustment
Moeller, R. W., Seehuus, M., Simonds, J., Lorton, E., Randle, T. S., Richter, C., & Peisch, V. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01858 · Cited by 26
Stellate Ganglion Block Reduces Anxiety Symptoms by Half: A Case Series of 285 Patients
Lynch, J. H., Mulvaney, S. W., Bryan, C. J., & Hernandez, D. (2023) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm13060958 · Cited by 25
“The MCID was calculated using a distribution-based approach [36], with GAD-7 change scores ≥ 4—approximately one standard deviation of the baseline mean score—set as the MCID threshold [37].”
MethodYao, K., Chen, P., Zhou, H., Ruan, J., Chen, D., Yang, X., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05348-w · Cited by 31
“The degree of anxiety was assessed by the Chinese version of the 7-items self-report Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) [46, 47].”
MethodMobile Mindfulness Intervention for Psychological Distress Among Intensive Care Unit Survivors
Cox, C. E., Gallis, J. A., Olsen, M. K., Porter, L. S., Gremore, T. M., Greeson, J. M., Morris, C. D., Moss, M., & Hough, C. L. (2024) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0823 · Cited by 26
Cohen, A., Naslund, J. A., Lane, E., Bhan, A., Rozatkar, A. R., Mehta, U. M., Vaidyam, A. N., Byun, A. J. S., Barnett, I., & Torous, J. B. (2024) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.13712 · Cited by 25
“30 Finally, our results provide estimates of the sample size necessary to validate these results in future studies.”
Parkash, V., Ashwin, H. M., Dey, S., Sádlová, J., Vojtková, B., Bocxlaer, K. V., Wiggins, R. C., David, T., Dey, N. S., Jaffe, C. L., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03146-9 · Cited by 28
The Effects of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak on Medical Students
Bilgi, K., Aytaş, G., Karatoprak, U., Kazancıoğlu, R., & Özçelik, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.637946 · Cited by 25
Carbajal, A. B., Navarro‐Flores, A., & Villarreal‐Zegarra, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673945 · Cited by 35
“Additionally, according to a survey using the COVISTRESS questionnaire, assessed in 67 countries of the five continents, the selfreported symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress increased by 21.62, 16.71, and 21.8%, respectively (Ugbolue et al., 2020).”
MethodInfluentialMedical cannabis use in Canada and its impact on anxiety and depression: A retrospective study
Sachedina, F., Chan, C., Damji, R. S., & de Sanctis, O. J. (2022) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114573 · Cited by 25
Demmin, D. L., Silverstein, S. M., & Shors, T. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.847301 · Cited by 24
“Score changes of four points or more on the GAD-7 are considered clinically significant (Toussaint et al., 2020).”
BackgroundZhang, H., Zhang, X., Jiang, X., Dai, R., Zhao, N., Pan, W., Guo, J., Fan, J., & Bao, S. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08139-0 · Cited by 25
“We selected the PHQ-9 depression and GAD-7 anxiety scales because they are believed to possess high reliability and validity and are widely used internationally as generic questionnaires for depression [25] and anxiety [26].”
MethodBeach, B., Steptoe, A., & Zaninotto, P. (2023) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004162 · Cited by 24
Stress-induced red nucleus attenuation induces anxiety-like behavior and lymph node CCL5 secretion
Shi, D., Zhang, Y.-D., Zhang, S., Liao, B.-B., Chu, M., Su, S., Zhuo, K., Hu, H., Zhang, C., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42814-1 · Cited by 22
The impact of asthma on mental health and wellbeing during COVID-19 lockdown
Higbee, D., Nava, G. W., Kwong, A. S. F., Dodd, J. W., & Granell, R. (2021) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.04497-2020 · Cited by 23
Hou, Y., Hou, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., & Chen, A. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.072 · Cited by 27
Patel, A., Tapper, E. B., Kanwal, F., Woodrell, C. D., Hansen, L., Lai, J. C., Rogal, S. S., McDermott, C. L., Rakoski, M. O., & Ufere, N. N. (2023) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000135 · Cited by 24
“— Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)[84] Observational[81] MCID: 4 points (out of 21) [261 patients with chronic depression][85]”
BackgroundZeng, H., Zeng, X., Xiong, N., Wang, L., Yang, Y., Wang, L., Li, H., & Zhao, W. (2024) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1339694 · Cited by 23
Fatouros, P., Tsirmpas, C., Andrikopoulos, D., Kaplow, S., Kontoangelos, K. A., & Papageorgiou, C. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01511-7 · Cited by 27
“Finally, minimal clinically important differences(MCID)werede fi nedaschangesofatleast5pointsforthePHQ-9 scores 101 and at least 4 points for the GAD-7 scores 102 .”
Burkova, V. N., Butovskaya, M., Randall, A. K., Fedenok, J. N., Ahmadi, K., AlGhraibeh, A. M. A., Allami, F. B. M., Alpaslan, F. S., Al-Zu’bi, M. A. A., Al-Mseidin, K. I., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805586 · Cited by 25
Chiauzzi, E. J., Williams, A. A. A., Mariano, T. Y., Pajarito, S., Robinson, A. H., Kirvin-Quamme, A., & Forman‐Hoffman, V. L. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05532-6 · Cited by 22
“This is noteworthy given that these outcomes were two and three points greater, respectively, than the typically accepted change score cutoff of five and four points to define a clinically significant response on the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 measures, respectively [49, 50].”
Spilg, E. G., Kuk, H., Ananny, L., McNeill, K., LeBlanc, V., Bauer, B. A., Sood, A., & Wells, P. S. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267240 · Cited by 21
The psychological impacts of COVID-19: a study of frontline physicians and nurses in the Arab world
Mahyijari, N., Badahdah, A. M., & Khamis, F. A. (2020) · Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/ipm.2020.119 · Cited by 20
“Generalized anxiety disorder-7 scale (GAD-7) This is one of the most used scales to gauge anxiety in both research and clinical settings (Toussaint et al., 2020).”
Horn, A., Stangl, S., Parisi, S., Bauer, N., Roll, J., Löffler, C., Gágyor, I., Haas, K., Heuschmann, P. U., Langhorst, J., et al. (2023) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.3226 · Cited by 22
Verkleij, M., Appelman, I., Altenburg, J., Twisk, J. W. R., Quittner, A. L., & Haarman, E. G. (2021) · ERJ Open Research · doi:10.1183/23120541.00274-2021 · Cited by 21
Þórarinsdóttir, K., Holmes, E. A., Hardarson, J., Stephenssen, E. S., Jonasdottir, M. H., Kanstrup, M., Singh, L., Hauksdóttir, A., Halldorsdottir, T., Guðmundsdóttir, B., et al. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/37382 · Cited by 17
“A 4-point change on the GAD-7 is considered clinically significant [33].”
BackgroundRoukas, C., Miller, L., Büttner, F., Hamborg, T., Stagg, I., Hart, A., Gordeev, V. S., Lindsay, J. O., Norton, C. S., & Mihaylova, B. (2024) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1002/ueg2.12668 · Cited by 20
“16,17”
The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review
Verma, R., Kilgour, H. M., & Haase, K. R. (2022) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol29020053 · Cited by 19
“This change met the level of minimal clinical important difference (MCID), which is estimated at 4 points on the GAD-7 total score [30].”
BackgroundBantjes, J. R., Hunt, X., Cuijpers, P. J., Kazdin, A. E., Kennedy, C. J., Luedtke, A. R., Malenica, I., Petukhova, M. V., Sampson, N. A., Zainal, N. H., et al. (2024) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104554 · Cited by 22
Zheng, F., Liu, S., Zhang, S., Yu, Q., Lo, W. L. A., Li, T., & Wang, C. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06116-z · Cited by 19
Yuan, S., Zhu, T., Gu, J., Li, H., Sun, J., Deng, X., & Ran, J. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17091582 · Cited by 26
“Each item was rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (“not at all”) to 3 (“nearly every day”) [25,26].”
Psychometric Evidence of the 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire in Brazil
Monteiro, R. P., Nascimento, B. D. S., Monteiro, T. M. C., da Silva, P. D. G., & Ferreira, A. J. C. (2020) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00423-9 · Cited by 19
Moleirinho-Alves, P., Almeida, A., Exposto, F. G., Oliveira, R., & Pezarat‐Correia, P. (2021) · Journal of Oral Rehabilitation · doi:10.1111/joor.13239 · Cited by 18
(2023) · doi:10.2196/47350 · Cited by 18
“%) of the users showed a reduction of ≥ 5 points (4 points is generally considered clinically significant [76]) in their anxiety levels.”
Murphy, M., Erridge, S., Holvey, C., Coomber, R., Rucker, J., & Sodergren, M. H. (2023) · Neuropsychopharmacology Reports · doi:10.1002/npr2.12407 · Cited by 17
“65,66 The SQS scale is a rapid self-reported assessment of sleep quality.”
BackgroundPet Attachment and Anxiety and Depression in Middle-Aged and Older Women
Żebrowska, M., Strohmaier, S., Huttenhower, C., Eliassen, A. H., Zeleznik, O. A., Westgarth, C., Huang, T., Laden, F., Hart, J. E., ROSNER, B. A., et al. (2024) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24810 · Cited by 18
Chu, C., Lin, Y., Huang, C. C., Chung, Y., Park, S. Y., Chang, W., Chang, C.-C., & Chang, H. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.087 · Cited by 17
Kunkle, S., Yip, M., Hunt, J. B., Watson, Ξ., Udall, D., Areán, P. A., Nierenberg, A. A., & Naslund, J. A. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/24662 · Cited by 18
“As a secondary analysis for users who screened positive at follow-up and completed a full GAD-7 survey, we also looked at a clinically significant reduction in score, defined as a score reduction of >5 points [26-28].”
BackgroundXiao, W., Xu, H., Yu, W., Li, S., Li, R., Jin, Z., Tao, F., & Wan, Y. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.060 · Cited by 17
Boden, L. M., Rodriguez, C., Kelly, J. D., Khalsa, A. S., & Casper, D. S. (2023) · JBJS Open Access · doi:10.2106/jbjs.oa.22.00114 · Cited by 16
Zahid, N., Blebu, B. E., Felder, J. N., McCulloch, C. E., Chambers, B. D., Curry, V. C., Carraway, K., León-Martínez, D., Coleman‐Phox, K., Kuppermann, M., et al. (2025) · Women s Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2025.01.006 · Cited by 16
Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant PTSD
Powers, M. B., Hays, S. A., Rosenfield, D., Al, P., Gallaway, H. L., Chauvette, G. V., Smits, J. A. J., Warren, A. M., Douglas, M., Naftalis, R. C., et al. (2025) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2025.03.007 · Cited by 16
“The Generalized Anxiety Disorder screener is a short questionnaire used to evaluate anxiety-related symptoms [36].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Toussaint, A., Hüsing, P., Gumz, A., Wingenfeld, K., Härter, M., Schramm, E., & Löwe, B.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Toussaint, Anne
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 265
- Pages
- 395-401
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000661394
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 134 · 2025: 138 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 30
- FWCI
- 61.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- GAD-7, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, anxiety symptoms, chronic depression, sensitivity to change, minimal clinically important difference, standardized response mean, treatment response monitoring, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
- MeSH terms
- Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Health Questionnaire, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Humans, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review