Cited by 69Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

An update on the clinical use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression

Fitzgerald, Paul B.·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an increasingly used treatment for patients with depression. The use of rTMS in depression is supported by over 20 years of clinical trials. There has been a significant increase in knowledge around the use of rTMS in recent years. Objective The aim of this paper was to review the use of rTMS in depression to provide an update for rTMS practitioners and clinicians interested in the clinical use of this treatment. Methods A targeted review of the literature around the use of rTMS treatment of depression with a specific focus on studies published in the last 3 years. Results High-frequency rTMS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is an effective treatment for acute episodes of major depressive disorder. There are several additional methods of rTMS delivery that are supported by clinical trials and meta-analyses but no substantive evidence that any one approach is any more effective than any other. rTMS is effective in unipolar depression and most likely bipolar depression. rTMS courses may be repeated in the management of depressive relapse but there is less evidence for the use of rTMS in the maintenance phase. Conclusions The science around the use of rTMS is rapidly evolving and there is a considerable need for practitioners to remain abreast of the current state of this literature and its implications for clinical practice. rTMS is an effective antidepressant treatment but its optimal use shoul…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.067

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitzgerald, P. B.
Affiliations
Epworth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Fitzgerald, Paul B.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
276
Pages
90-103
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3043165804
Cited by
69
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (1078567)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, depression, major depressive disorder, high-frequency rTMS, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, bipolar depression, depression relapse, maintenance therapy, antidepressant treatment
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review