Cited by 442Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial

Open access
Levkovitz, Yechiel, Isserles, Moshe, Padberg, Frank, Lisanby, Sarah H., Bystritsky, Alexander, Xia, Guohua, Tendler, Aron, Daskalakis, Zafiris J. +17 more·2015·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and disabling condition, and many patients do not respond to available treatments. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) is a new technology allowing non-surgical stimulation of relatively deep brain areas. This is the first double-blind randomized controlled multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of dTMS in MDD. We recruited 212 MDD outpatients, aged 22-68 years, who had either failed one to four antidepressant trials or not tolerated at least two antidepressant treatments during the current episode. They were randomly assigned to monotherapy with active or sham dTMS. Twenty sessions of dTMS (18 Hz over the prefrontal cortex) were applied during 4 weeks acutely, and then biweekly for 12 weeks. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were the change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-21) score and response/remission rates at week 5, respectively. dTMS induced a 6.39 point improvement in HDRS-21 scores, while a 3.28 point improvement was observed in the sham group (p=0.008), resulting in a 0.76 effect size. Response and remission rates were higher in the dTMS than in the sham group (response: 38.4 vs. 21.4%, p=0.013; remission: 32.6 vs. 14.6%, p=0.005). These differences between active and sham treatment were stable during the 12-week maintenance phase. dTMS was associated with few and minor side effects apart from one seizure in a patient where a protocol violation occurred. These results suggest that dTMS constitutes a novel intervention in MDD, which is efficacious and safe in patients not responding to antidepressant medications, and whose effect remains stable over 3 months of maintenance treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20199

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dlabac-de Lange JJ, Knegtering R, Aleman A. Repetitive transcra- nial magnetic stimulation for negative symptoms of schizophre- nia: review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71:411-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levkovitz, Y., Isserles, M., Padberg, F., Lisanby, S. H., Bystritsky, A., Xia, G., Tendler, A., Daskalakis, Z. J., Winston, J. L., Dannon, P., Hafez, H. M., Reti, I. M., Morales, O. G., Schlaepfer, T. E., Hollander, E., Berman, J. A., Husain, M. M., Sofer, U., Stein, A., Adler, S., Deutsch, L., Deutsch, F., Roth, Y., George, M. S., & Zangen, A.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Advanced Mental Health Care (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Senior Adult Specialty Healthcare; Austin TX USA
  • Greater Nashua Mental Health Center; Nashua NH USA
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
  • Spectrum Neuroscience and Treatment Institute (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • BrainsWay (Israel) (IL)
  • A. Stein - Regulatory Affairs Consulting Ltd.; Kfar Saba Israel
  • Biostatistical Consulting, BioStats; Israel
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
64-73
ISSN
1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049990060
Cited by
442
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17
FWCI
20.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
BrainsWay
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
deep transcranial magnetic stimulation, major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, antidepressant-refractory depression, prefrontal cortex stimulation, treatment response and remission, maintenance therapy, treatment safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review