Cited by 25Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Neurocognitive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with a 2-coil device in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder

Kavanaugh, Brian C., Aaronson, Scott T., Clarke, Gregory N., Holtzheimer, Paul E., Johnson, Clark W., McDonald, William M., Schneider, M. Bret, Carpenter, Linda L.·2018·The Journal of ECT

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive dysfunction is an understudied and undertreated aspect of psychiatric research and treatment. There is emerging evidence to suggest that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may possess neurocognition-enhancing capabilities. METHODS: This study examined the neurocognitive data from a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of an investigational 2-coil rTMS device in antidepressant treatment or treatment-intolerant major depressive disorder patients. This device has the potential to stimulate deeper areas of the brain than the Food and Drug Administration-approved TMS devices, which primarily stimulate cortical brain areas and may therefore have different neurocognitive adverse effects. Patients received 20 daily rTMS treatments (10-Hz stimulation; either active or sham) with coil centers positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. Neurocognitive safety was evaluated at baseline and within 72 hours of final treatment session with a computerized battery assessing aspects of attention and memory in 84 participants. RESULTS: There were no observed negative neurocognitive effects of the 2-coil rTMS device. A significant effect of active rTMS was observed on the quality of episodic memory. There were no observed effects for attention or working memory. Baseline quality of episodic memory predicted depression treatment response and remission, in that lower baseline episodic memory was as…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yct.0000000000000494

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavanaugh, B. C., Aaronson, S. T., Clarke, G. N., Holtzheimer, P. E., Johnson, C. W., McDonald, W. M., Schneider, M. B., & Carpenter, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Bradley Hospital (US)
  • Sheppard Pratt Health System (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • PRA Health Sciences (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Butler Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kavanaugh, Brian C.
  • Schneider, M. Bret
Venue
The Journal of ECT
Published
2018-12
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
258-265
ISSN
  • 1095-0680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4112
OpenAlex
W2795762625
Cited by
25
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, episodic memory, attention, working memory, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, treatment response prediction, depression remission
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review