Cited by 413Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumCOVID-19 and Mental HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

Maternal psychological distress & mental health service use during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Cameron, Emily E., Joyce, Kayla M., Delaquis, Chantal P., Reynolds, Kristin, Protudjer, Jennifer L.P., Roos, Leslie E.·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Mental health problems are increasingly recognized as a significant and concerning secondary effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Research on previous epidemics/pandemics suggest that families, particularly mothers, may be at increased risk, but this population has yet to be examined. The current study (1) described prevalence rates of maternal depressive and anxiety symptoms from an online convenience sample during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) identified risk and protective factors for elevated symptoms, and (3) described current mental health service use and barriers.Methods Participants (N = 641) were mothers of children age 0-8 years, including expectant mothers. Mothers completed an online survey assessing mental health, sociodemographic information, and COVID-19-related variables.Results Clinically-relevant depression was indicated in 33.16%, 42.55%, and 43.37% of mothers of children age 0-18 months, 18 months to 4 years, and 5 to 8 years, respectively. Prevalence of anxiety was 36.27%, 32.62%, and 29.59% for mothers across age groups, respectively. Binary logistic regressions indicated significant associations between risk factors and depression/anxiety across child age groups.Limitations Cross-sectional data was used to describe maternal mental health problems during COVID-19 limiting the ability to make inferences about the long-term impact of maternal depression and anxiety on family well-being.Conclusions Maternal depression and anxiety appear to be elevated in the context of COVID-19 compared to previously reported population norms. Identified risk factors for depression and anxiety across different child age ranges can inform targeted early intervention strategies to prevent long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on family well-being and child development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.081

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A convenience sample of mothers in the United States of children 0-18 months of age showed elevated rates of depressive (34.1%) and anxiety (34.6%) symptoms.

    “Similarly, a convenience sample of mothers in the United States of children 0–18 months of age showed elevated rates of depressive (34.1%) and anxiety (34.6%) symptoms.12”

    From Perinatal Depression: Challenges and Opportunities (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Eaton W. Smith C. Ybarra M. Muntaner C. Tien A. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: review and Revision (CESD and CESD-R) Maruish M.E. The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment: Instruments for Adults 2004 Routledge 363 377

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, E. E., Joyce, K. M., Delaquis, C. P., Reynolds, K., Protudjer, J. L. P., & Roos, L. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Cameron, Emily E.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
276
Pages
765-774
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044252136
Cited by
413
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 18
FWCI
62.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
  • University of Manitoba
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Research Manitoba
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
maternal depression, maternal anxiety, COVID-19 pandemic, maternal mental health, mental health service utilization, barriers to mental health care, risk and protective factors, mothers of young children, pregnant women, prevalence of depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Anxiety, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Mothers, Pneumonia, Viral, Prevalence, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review