Cited by 43Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

EEG correlates of attentional control in anxiety disorders: A systematic review of error-related negativity and correct-response negativity findings

Michael, Jessica A., Wang, Michael, Kaur, Manreena, Fitzgerald, Paul B., Fitzgibbon, Bernadette M., Hoy, Kate E.·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and cause substantial personal, social and economic burden. Altered attentional control has been shown to be present across anxiety disorders and is associated with specific changes in brain activity which can be recorded by electroencephalogram (EEG). These include changes in the EEG markers of error-related negativity (ERN) and correct-response negativity (CRN), both believed to reflect response monitoring and attentional control pathophysiology in anxiety. The aim of this review was to systematically assess the research on ERN and CRN in attentional control in individuals with clinical anxiety and healthy controls, across emotional and non-emotional attentional control. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies published prior to October 22 nd , 2020. Details of the protocol for this systematic review were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019144885). Results 66 studies had their data extracted. All 66 studies measured ERN, with 85% finding significantly increased ERN amplitudes associated with clinical anxiety. Only 44 of the extracted studies analysed CRN and only ~20% of these found significant changes in CRN amplitude associated with individuals with clinical anxiety. Limitations There were several anxiety disorders that had either limited literature (i.e. specific phobia, separation anxiety disorder or agoraphobia) or nil literature (i.e. selective mutism) available. No extracted studies included s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.049

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michael, J. A., Wang, M., Kaur, M., Fitzgerald, P. B., Fitzgibbon, B. M., & Hoy, K. E.
Affiliations
Epworth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Michael, Jessica A.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
291
Pages
140-153
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165617290
Cited by
43
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1082894, GNT111261)
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (26366)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
anxiety disorders, attentional control, error-related negativity, correct response negativity, response monitoring, EEG biomarkers, emotional attention, transdiagnostic markers
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review