Cited by 4Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

A meta-analysis of the intervention effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on adult ADHD

Liu, Yang, Zhu, Feilong, Yu, Yueyong, Song, Yiqi, Luo, Hao, Xu, Baohua, Lin, Shengqi, Ha, Zhitong +4 more·2026·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Objective This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Methods A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methodological quality assessment and statistical analysis were performed using Review Manager 5.3 in accordance with Cochrane guidelines. Results Analysis of 14 RCTs selected from 949 identified records showed significant benefits of CBT for core ADHD symptoms (SMD = -0.45, P < 0.00001), depressive mood (SMD = -0.23, P = 0.001), anxiety/stress (SMD = -0.24, P = 0.003), and executive function (SMD = -0.43, P = 0.001). No significant effects were observed for quality of life (SMD = 0.12, P = 0.47) or self-evaluation (SMD = -0.30, P = 0.22). Prespecified subgroup analyses revealed distinct efficacy profiles. By treatment composition, pure CBT demonstrated superior effects on core symptoms (SMD = -0.51, P < 0.00001) and executive function (SMD = -0.56, P < 0.0001), while CBT combined with medication showed greater efficacy for quality of life (SMD = 0.34, P = 0.02) and anxiety/stress (SMD = -0.53, P = 0.0004). By delivery mode, efficacy varied symptom-specifically: group-based formats (Group CBT, Specialized Skills Training) showed stronger effects on core symptoms, whereas Individual CBT was most effective for improving emotional outcomes (depressive mood, anxiety/stress) and quality of life. Conclusion CBT demonstrates efficacy for core and associated symptoms of adult ADHD, with the optimal intervention strategy varying meaningfully by outcome and modality. A symptom-guided, stepped-care approach is supported: group-based CBT formats are preferable for targeting core symptoms and executive function, while individual CBT better addresses emotional dysregulation and quality of life. The combination of CBT with medication offers added benefit for anxiety and quality of life. The consistent lack of effect on self-evaluation highlights a critical unmet therapeutic need.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2025.121107

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Liu, Y., Zhu, F., Yu, Y., Song, Y., Luo, H., Xu, B., Lin, S., Ha, Z., Kuang, D., Xie, Y., Chen, Z., & Ren, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • North China Institute of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Ren, Yuanchun
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-04
Volume
399
Pages
121107
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7117980530
Cited by
4
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education (21YJA890025)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, adult ADHD, executive function, depressive mood, stress and anxiety, quality of life, self-assessment, group versus individual therapy, stepped care, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review