Cited by 156Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAdolescent Health and BehaviorsYouth, Drugs, and Violence

Risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use in Washington State, the United States and Victoria, Australia: A longitudinal study

Open access

Abstract

Purpose To compare the levels of risk and protective factors and the predictive influence of these factors on alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use over a 12-month follow-up period in Washington State in the United States and in Victoria, Australia.Method The study involved a longitudinal school-based survey of students drawn as a two-stage cluster sample recruited through schools, and administered in the years 2002 and 2003 in both states. The study used statewide representative samples of students in the seventh and ninth grades (n = 3,876) in Washington State and Victoria.Results Washington State students, relative to Victorian students, had higher rates of cannabis use but lower rates of alcohol and tobacco use at time 1. Levels of risk and protective factors showed few but important differences that contribute to the explanation of differences in substance use; Washington State students, relative to Victorian students, reported higher religiosity (odds ratio, .96 vs. .79) and availability of handguns (odds ratio, 1.23 vs. 1.18), but less favorable peer, community, and parental attitudes to substance use. The associations with substance use at follow-up are generally comparable, but in many instances were weaker in Washington State.Conclusions Levels of risk and protective factors and their associations with substance use at follow-up were mostly similar in the two states. Further high-quality longitudinal studies to establish invariance in the relations between risk and protective factors and substance use in adolescence across diverse countries are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.017

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The problem gambling risk factors identified in the present review are similar to those for other problem behaviours such as alcohol, tobacco, marijuana use, and delinquency.

    “Interestingly, the problem gambling risk factors identified in the present review are similar to those for other problem behaviours such as alcohol, tobacco, marijuana use, and delinquency (Bond, Toumbourou, Thomas, Catalano, & Patton, 2005;Hemphill et al., 2011;Vitaro et al., 2001;Wanner et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]Garmezy N Stress-resistant children: The search for protective factors Stevenson JE Recent research in developmental psychopathology Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Book Supplement No 4 Oxford, HK Pergamon Press 1985 213 233
  2. [32]Kish L Survey Sampling New York, NY John Wiley & Sons 1965
  3. [37]Cohen J Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Revised New York Academic Press 1977

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hemphill, S. A., Heerde, J. A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Patton, G. C., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Hemphill, Sheryl A.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
312-320
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006459204
Cited by
156
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA017188)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA012140)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042828)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
Keywords
adolescent substance use, risk factors, protective factors, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, cannabis use, religiosity, attitudes toward substance use, cross-national comparison, Washington State, Victoria, Australia, school-based survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Peer Group, Social Environment, Victoria, Washington, Health Behavior, Substance-Related Disorders, Harm Reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review