Cited by 67Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime Patterns and Interventions

A prospective study of adolescent risk and protective factors for problem gambling among young adults

Scholes‐Balog, Kirsty E., Hemphill, Sheryl A., Dowling, Nicki A., Toumbourou, John W.·2014·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

There is a paucity of research examining prospective predictors of problem gambling. The current study utilised a large longitudinal data set (N = 2328) to examine a large range of adolescent risk and protective factors for problem gambling in young adulthood. These risk and protective factors covered the domains of the community, family, school, peer group and individual. Numerous predictors associated with the family, school and peer-individual were statistically significant in analyses adjusted for gender and age. However, in the fully adjusted multivariate analyses, only two predictors were statistically significant. Within this model, gender (female) was associated with a reduced risk of young adult problem gambling, while family rewards for prosocial involvement moderated the risk relationship between adolescent alcohol use and young adult problem gambling. These findings highlight the importance of adolescent alcohol use and family environment as potentially modifiable predictors of young adult problem gambling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.12.006

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scholes‐Balog, K. E., Hemphill, S. A., Dowling, N. A., & Toumbourou, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Scholes‐Balog, Kirsty E.
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-09
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
215-224
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2050016261
Cited by
67
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
problem gambling, young adults, adolescent risk factors, protective factors, adolescent alcohol use, family environment, gender differences, peer influence, school environment, community environment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Family, Female, Gambling, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Reward, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Victoria, Multivariate Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review