Cited by 232Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adolescent Mental Health Literacy: Young People’s Knowledge of Depression and Social Anxiety Disorder

Abstract

Purpose Understanding why nearly 80% of youth ages 6-18 years with a mental disorder fail to receive treatment represents an important public health priority. International data suggest that underrecognition of mental illness and the need for treatment are barriers to service utilization. This study extends work to a U.S. sample of 1,104 adolescents.Methods High School students were invited to participate in a self-report study assessing knowledge and beliefs regarding mental illness. Participants completed the survey in groups at school and read vignettes portraying peers experiencing major depression, social anxiety disorder, and a situation where the individual has to cope with a common life stressor followed by a series of questions in reference to each vignette.Results Adolescents had better recognition of depression than social anxiety disorder and were more likely to recommend seeking help for it. However, <50% of youth recognized depression. Family, friends, and counselors were recommended as sources of help. Differences according to the sex of the respondent and person in the vignette were observed.Conclusions These data are among the first to provide information regarding the mental health literacy of American adolescents and suggest potential points for intervention. Pending replication of the findings herein, efforts to help adolescents recognize mental health problems and to increase the likelihood of recommending professional help will be important.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.017

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rosenthal, 1991, Vol. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
Coles, M. E., Ravid, A., Gibb, B., George-Denn, D., Bronstein, L. R., & McLeod, S.
Affiliations
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Coles, Meredith E.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
57-62
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2221002602
Cited by
223
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
depression, social anxiety disorder, help-seeking, mental illness recognition, barriers to treatment, sex differences, vignettes, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, United States, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review