Cited by 527COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealth disparities and outcomesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Increases in loneliness among young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic and association with increases in mental health problems

Open access
Lee, Christine M., Cadigan, Jennifer M., Rhew, Isaac C.·2020·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose Young adults are at high risk for increases in loneliness and mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study examined increases in loneliness in a young adult sample, for whom increases were greater, and association with increases in depression and anxiety. Method Data from 564 young adults (ages 22-29, 60.7% women) were collected in January 2020 (pre-pandemic) and April/May 2020 (during pandemic). Results Loneliness increased from January to April/May and changes in loneliness were greater for females, those with higher perceived social support in January, and those with greater concerns about the pandemic's social impacts. Depression (but not anxiety) increased during this time with changes in loneliness accounting for much of the increase in depression. Conclusions Intervention strategies with young adults need to address loneliness and feelings of reduced social support during this time, especially for those who may have had greater disruption in their social lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.009

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 13 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Young adults report the highest levels of loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “with young adults reporting the highest levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] McGinty, 2020, Psychological distress and loneliness reported by US adults in 2018 and April 2020, JAMA source

      The results passage (indexed as Methods |, page unavailable) reports that psychological distress was highest among adults aged 18–29, but gives only an overall loneliness estimate of 13.8%. The paper does not report loneliness by age in the passages found when searching for young adults and age-group loneliness, so the claimed ranking cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [4] Luchetti, 2020, The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19, Am Psychol source

      The Results report that older adults had lower loneliness than both younger and middle-aged adults across the study’s assessments, including those during the pandemic. They do not directly compare younger with middle-aged adults, so the finding does not fully establish that young adults reported the highest levels. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    In cross-sectional data, people who are lonely have about seven times the odds of meeting criteria for moderate-to-severe depression relative to those who are not lonely.

    “Cross-sectionally, lonely individuals are nearly 7 times more likely to meet clinical criteria for moderate to severe depression symptoms compared to nonlonely individuals [5].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Killgore, 2020, Loneliness: A signature mental health concern in the era of COVID-19, Psychiatry Res source
  • Premisecitation

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, young adults face elevated risk for depression and anxiety.

    “Young adults particularly are at high risk for mental health problems including depression and anxiety during the pandemic [1,2]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [2] McGinty, 2020, Psychological distress and loneliness reported by US adults in 2018 and April 2020, JAMA source

      The Results passage reports that serious psychological distress in April 2020 was highest among adults aged 18–29 (24.0%), supporting the elevated-risk claim for young adults. The Methods passage says the study measured psychological distress with the Kessler 6 scale, not depression and anxiety separately, so those specific conditions are not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Females showed a steeper rise in loneliness between January and April/May than males did.

    “There was a steeper increase in loneliness in females compared to males (interaction-p = .018)”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “Women showed steeper increases in loneliness”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Those with more concern about how the pandemic affected their social relationships experienced a larger rise in loneliness than those with less concern.

    “in those reporting higher compared to lower levels of concerns about the pandemic's impact on social concerns in April/May (interaction-p <.001)”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “those with greater concerns about COVID-19's impact on their social relationships”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Loneliness prevalence during the COVID-19 pandemic has been reported as either roughly unchanged or modestly higher.

    “Some studies suggest the prevalence of loneliness has stayed relatively stable, or increased slightly, during the COVID-19 pandemic [2,4]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] McGinty, 2020, Psychological distress and loneliness reported by US adults in 2018 and April 2020, JAMA source
    • cites [4] Luchetti, 2020, The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19, Am Psychol source

      The Results report no significant change in mean loneliness across assessments, while the Discussion notes a slight increase among older adults. This supports the broad pattern of stability or a modest increase, but the paper reports loneliness scores rather than prevalence, and the increase was limited to an age subgroup. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Perceived social support was assessed with the 12-item Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, which had α = .91.

    “Perceived Social Support was measured with the 12-item Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support [9] in January (mean of 12 items; α = .91) and dichotomized for analyses based on the median of the total score (Low: <55; High: 55+) for ease of interpretation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Zimet, 1988, The multidimensional scale of perceived social support, J Pers Assess source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Clinically elevated depression symptoms were present in 22.5% of the sample in January and 25.2% in April/May, exceeding national young adult averages.

    “In both January and April/May, the prevalence of clinically elevated symptoms of anxiety (31.2% and 29.8%, respectively) and depression (22.5% and 25.2%) were higher than national averages with young adults [11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Eisenberg, 2007, Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population, MedCare source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Clinically elevated anxiety symptoms were present in 31.2% of the sample in January and 29.8% in April/May, exceeding national young adult averages.

    “In both January and April/May, the prevalence of clinically elevated symptoms of anxiety (31.2% and 29.8%, respectively) and depression (22.5% and 25.2%) were higher than national averages with young adults [11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Eisenberg, 2007, Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population, MedCare source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Loneliness was assessed with the three-item Loneliness Scale, which showed internal consistency of α = .80.

    “Past month loneliness was measured with the three-item Loneliness Scale [7] including feeling “that you lack companionship”, “left out”, and “isolated from others” (α = .80).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Hughes, 2004, A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies, Res Ageing source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Models estimating changes in loneliness and mental health controlled for sex, sexual orientation, January age, race/ethnicity, and January education.

    “We used mixed-effects models to assess changes in loneliness and mental health outcomes from January to April/May, adjusted for sex, sexual orientation, age in January, dummy codes for race/ethnicity, and education completed as of January.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, each with α = .88.

    “Past month depression (“Little interest or pleasure in doing things”; “Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless”; α = .88) and anxiety (“Feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge”,“Not being able to stop or control worrying”; α = .88) were measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Kroenke, 2009, An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ–4, Psychosomatics source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Concerns about COVID-19's social impact were measured with three items, which had α = .70.

    “COVID-19–related social concerns (“making you feel isolated or alone”, “placing a strain on your social life”, “placing a strain on relationships with those you live with”) was assessed in the April/May survey (mean of three items; α = .70) and dichotomized based on the median (low: <1.67; high: 1.67+), again, for ease of interpretation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The supplemental surveys had completion rates of 75.6% in January and 72.0% in April/May.

    “Completion rates were 75.6% in January (conducted on January 6–30 to get updated contact information, current social role statuses, substance use, and mental health) and 72.0% in April/May (conducted on April 21-May 18 to get an update during the COVID-19 pandemic).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
9 of 9
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, young adults face elevated risk of becoming lonelier.

    “Young adults are at high risk for increases in loneliness and mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pandemic and its mitigation measures have had immediate, unprecedented effects across many life domains, including mental health.

    “The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting mitigation policies (e.g., shelter-in-place) are associated with immediate and unprecedented impacts on multiple facets of life including mental health.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Few prior studies have tracked within-person mental health changes from before to during the pandemic.

    “although most studies have not examined within-person changes from before to during the pandemic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Young adulthood is a critical period for interpersonal development, education, and career formation.

    “This may be especially true for young adults who are undergoing a critical time of interpersonal development, education, and career building.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social and physical distancing mandates brought an immediate, fundamental change to Americans' social lives.

    “not surprising as public health social/physical distancing mandates had an immediate and fundamental shift for Americans' social lives.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with decreases in positive emotions and quality of life and increases in negative emotions, anxiety, fear, stress, depression, and sleep disturbances.

    “mental health has been characterized by decreases in positive emotions and quality of life [5,6,7,8] as well as increases in negative emotions, anxiety, fear, stress, depression, and sleep disturbances [8,9,10,11,12,13,14].”

    From At the Peak of the Second Wave of COVID-19, Did Millennials Show Different Emotional Responses from Older Adults? (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results report increased depression among young adults from January to April/May 2020, supporting that part of the claim. They report no increase in anxiety, however, and the passages do not document changes in positive or negative emotions, quality of life, fear, stress, or sleep disturbances. The study’s young-adult sample also does not establish those changes for the population generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence demonstrates the negative psychological impact of continued isolation for young people in particular since their life stage is more intensely shaped by their social environment.

    “Certainly, evidence demonstrates the negative psychological impact of continued isolation for young people in particular since their life stage is more intensely shaped by their social environment (i.e. exposure to peers and learning environment) [26–28].”

    From Facilitators and barriers to social distancing for young people during the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract Results report increased loneliness and depression, but not anxiety, among young adults from January to April/May 2020; changes in loneliness accounted for much of the increase in depression. The introduction describes young adulthood as a critical period for interpersonal development and education. The study does not establish the psychological effects of continued isolation or directly compare young people’s dependence on their social environment with that of other age groups. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hope is associated with life meaning among cancer survivors.

    “life meaning among cancer survivors [28-30]”

    From A digital, coach-assisted intervention to address the psychosocial needs of young adult cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial protocol and intervention adaptation process (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Methods (Study measures; page unavailable) describes measures of loneliness, depression, anxiety, and social support in young adults. Searches for hope, life meaning, and cancer survivors found no passage addressing an association between hope and life meaning among cancer survivors. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Loneliness during the pandemic has been associated with a decline in psychological well-being.

    “which have been associated with a decline in psychological well-being.40”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C. M., Cadigan, J. M., & Rhew, I. C.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Christine M.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
714-717
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092376919
Cited by
526
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 6
FWCI
35.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
loneliness, young adults, COVID-19 pandemic, depression, anxiety, perceived social support, gender differences, social isolation
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Mental Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Social Isolation, Washington, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review