Cited by 27Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Home care in dementia: The views of informal carers from a co-designed consultation

Open access
Dalgarno, Elizabeth L, Gillan, Vincent, Roberts, Amy, Tottie, Jean, Britt, David, Toole, Cecilia, Clarkson, Paul·2021·Dementia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom, there is a current priority for high-quality dementia care provided at home. However, home care or domiciliary care is an area where problems have been reported, in terms of a lack of consistency, coordination and appropriate responses to the specific needs of those with dementia. The views of informal carers, who often must respond to these problems when supporting relatives, are crucial in shedding light on the issues and in seeking to promote solutions. METHODS: This study explored the views of informal carers of those with dementia concerning home care, through a consultation using an electronic survey. The survey questions were designed by informal carers, through a public involvement group within an existing programme of dementia research. The survey elicited responses from 52 informal carers in 2017/18. The data were analysed qualitatively using framework analysis. FINDINGS: Carers' views focused on the need for investment into meaningful personalisation, recognising the value of providing care and valuing formal carers, systemic failings of care coordination and provision and the importance of ongoing collaboration and care planning. CONCLUSION: Based on a framework drawn from the views of informal carers themselves, this study articulated issues of concern for home care and its delivery for people with dementia. Attempts should be made to make dementia home care more consistently personalised, inclusive and collaborative with informal carers and key others involved. Further areas to explore include working conditions of formal carers and current models utilised in homecare provision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1471301221990504

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delivering person-centred care becomes even more challenging because relational discontinuity prevents meaningful personalization of care.

    “Furthermore, delivering person-centred care becomes even more challenging since relational discontinuity prevents meaningful personalization of care [41].”
  • Informal caregiver burden is well documented in the dementia literature, and burden increases with poor quality and lack of continuity of care.

    “Informal caregiver burden is well documented in the dementia literature [40], as is the increase of burden with poor quality and lack of continuity of care [41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Anthony A. (2015). Connecting communities in London. In Milne A. Smith J. (Eds.). Dementia, ethnicity and care homes. Dementia, culture and ethnicity: Issues for all, (Vol. 33). Jessica Kingsley Publishing.
  2. Bryman A. Burgess R.G. (1994). Developments in qualitative data analysis. In Bryman A. Burgess RG. (Eds.) Analyzing qualitative data, (pp. 1- 17). Routledge.
  3. Jansen H. (2010) The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2), 11.
  4. Milne A. Smith J. (2015). Dementia, ethnicity and care homes. Dementia, culture and ethnicity: Issues for all, (Vol. 33). Jessica Kingsley Publishing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalgarno, E. L., Gillan, V., Roberts, A., Tottie, J., Britt, D., Toole, C., & Clarkson, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Family Carer, Together in Dementia, Liverpool, UK
  • Family Carer, Manchester, UK
  • Family Carer, Sight and Mind, Merseyside, UK
Corresponding author
Dalgarno, Elizabeth L
Venue
Dementia
Published
2021-02-03
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
2261-2277
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W3127352792
Cited by
27
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), School for Social Care Research (1162242)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
home care, informal caregivers, caregiver perspectives, care coordination, individualized care, care planning, collaboration, citizen participation, co-design, professional caregivers
MeSH terms
Dementia, Home Care Services, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review