Cited by 119Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Association of five-factor model personality domains and facets with presence, onset, and treatment outcomes of major depression in older adults

Open access
Hayward, R. David, Taylor, Warren D., Smoski, Moria J., Steffens, David C., Payne, Martha E.·2013·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives To assess the relationship of multiple domains and facets of the five-factor model of personality with presence, onset, and severity of late-life depression.Design Cross-sectional analysis of depression status, and age of onset. Retrospective analysis of baseline severity. Longitudinal analysis of severity after 3 and 12 months of psychiatric treatment.Setting Private university-affiliated medical center in the Southeastern United States.Participants One hundred twelve psychiatric patients with a current episode of unipolar major depression, and 104 nondepressed comparison subjects, age 60 and older (mean: 70, SD: 6).Measurements Revised NEO Personality Inventory, Diagnostic Interview Schedule, and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.Results Binary logistic regression found that depression was related to higher neuroticism (and all its facets) and to lower extraversion (and facets of assertiveness, activity, and positive emotionality) and conscientiousness (and facets of competence, order, dutifulness, and self-discipline). Multinomial logistic regression found some of these relationships held only for depression with onset before age 50 (hostility, self-consciousness, extraversion, assertiveness, positive emotions, order, and dutifulness). Linear regression found that personality was unrelated to depression severity at the beginning of treatment, but improvement after 3 months was related to lower neuroticism (and facets depressiveness and stress-vulnerability) and higher warmth and competence. Improvement after 12 months was related to lower neuroticism, depressiveness, and stress-vulnerability.Conclusions Specific personality facets are related with depression and treatment outcomes. Screening for certain personality traits at the start of treatment may help identify patients at risk of worse response to treatment after 3 months.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.012

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present findings replicate and extend existing evidence that neuroticism, and vulnerability to stress specifically, affects both treatment response and cognitive decline in late-life major depression.

    “The present findings replicate and extend existing evidence for the impact of neuroticism, and VS specifically, on both treatment response and cognitive decline in LLD (18, 19).”
  • Preliminary evidence indicated that high total neuroticism and the vulnerability to stress trait were the only neuroticism scores associated with worse one-year antidepressant treatment response and two-year decline in global cognitive functioning in late-life major depression.

    “Our preliminary evidence indicated high total neuroticism and the VS trait were the only neuroticism scores associated with both a worse one-year antidepressant treatment response and a two-year decline in global cognitive functioning in LLD (18, 19).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayward, R. D., Taylor, W. D., Smoski, M. J., Steffens, D. C., & Payne, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hayward, R. David
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
88-96
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965180119
Cited by
119
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH60451, K24MH070027, MH70027, R01MH054846, MH-54846, K23MH087754, P50MH060451)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality facets, geriatric depression, major depressive disorder, neuroticism, extraversion, conscientiousness, depression onset, depression severity, treatment response, personality screening, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality, Personality Inventory, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review