CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 110Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare Policy and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct medical costs and source of cost differences across the spectrum of cognitive decline: A population‐based study

Open access
Leibson, Cynthia L., Long, Kirsten Hall, Ransom, Jeanine E., Roberts, Rosebud O., Hass, Steven L., Duhig, Amy M., Smith, Carin Y., Emerson, Jane A., Pankratz, V. Shane, Petersen, Ronald C.·2015·Alzheimer's & Dementia
DOI 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.007PMC PMC4543557
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Objective cost estimates and source of cost differences are needed across the spectrum of cognition, including cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), newly discovered dementia, and prevalent dementia. Methods: Subjects were a subset of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging stratified‐random sampling of Olmsted County, MN, residents aged 70 to 89 years. A neurologist reviewed provider‐linked medical records to identify prevalent dementia (review date = index). Remaining subjects were invited to participate in prospective clinical/neuropsychological assessments; participants were categorized as CN, MCI, or newly discovered dementia (assessment date = index). Costs for medical services/procedures 1‐year pre‐index (excluding indirect and long‐term care costs) were estimated using line‐item provider‐linked administrative data. We estimated contributions of care‐delivery site and comorbid conditions (including and excluding neuropsychiatric diagnoses) to between‐category cost differences. Results: Annual mean medical costs for CN, MCI, newly discovered dementia, and prevalent dementia were $6042, $6784, $9431, $11,678, respectively. Hospital inpatient costs contributed 70% of total costs for prevalent dementia and accounted for differences between CN and both prevalent and newly discovered dementia. Ambulatory costs accounted for differences between CN and MCI. Age‐, sex‐, education‐adjusted differences reached significance for CN versus newly discovered and prevalent dementia and for MCI versus prevalent dementia. After considering all comorbid diagnoses, between‐category differences were reduced (e.g., prevalent dementia minus MCI (from $4842 to $3575); newly discovered dementia minus CN (from $3578 to $711)). Following the exclusion of neuropsychiatric diagnoses from comorbidity adjustment, between‐category differences tended to revert to greater differences. Conclusions: Cost estimates did not differ significantly between CN and MCI. Substantial differences between MCI and prevalent dementia reflected high inpatient costs for dementia and appear partly related to co‐occurring mental disorders. Such comparisons can help inform models aimed at identifying where, when, and for which individuals proposed interventions might be cost‐effective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.007

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Welsh KA, 1993, Detection of dementia in the elderly using telephone screening of cognitive status, Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol, 6, 103
  2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2009, The Johns Hopkins ACG® System: Excerpt from Technical Reference Guide, Version 9.0
  3. Emerson J, 2013, Nursing home use and dependency across the full trajectory of cognitive decline: normal, mild cognitive impairment, newly discovered, and prevalent dementia, Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 28, 592

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Leibson, C. L., Long, K. H., Ransom, J. E., Roberts, R. O., Hass, S. L., Duhig, A. M., Smith, C. Y., Emerson, J. A., Pankratz, V. S., & Petersen, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • K Long Health Economics Consulting LLC St. Paul MN USA
  • AbbVie (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Leibson, Cynthia L.
ORCID
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-06
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
917-932
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
DOI
10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.007
PMC
PMC4543557
OpenAlex
W2114983566
Cited by
110
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 AG034676)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
direct medical costs, mild cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Databases, Factual, Health Care Costs, Disease Progression, Community Health Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review