CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216Linguistic and Cultural StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesHistory of Science and Natural History

The naming of wild animal species and their domestic derivatives

Gentry, Anthea, Clutton-Brock, Juliet, Groves, Colin P·2004·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2003.10.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2003.10.006

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MDD acknowledges that recognizing these 17 domestic forms as species is a deviation from the species recognition standards outlined in the Taxonomic decision making section and follows the naming conventions for domestic species and their wild ancestors outlined by Gentry et al. (2004).

    “Thus, the MDD acknowledges that recognizing these 17 domestic forms as species is a deviation from the species recognition standards outlined in the Taxonomic decision making section above and follows the naming conventions for domestic species and their wild ancestors outlined by Gentry et al. (2004).”

    From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Gentry et al. (2004)

  • Opinion 2027 retained Linnaeus's grunniens and Przewalski's mutus to distinguish between the domestic and wild forms of the yak, respectively.

    “The recent Opinion 2027 of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (2003) retained Linnaeus's grunniens and Przewalski's mutus to distinguish between the domestic and wild forms of the yak, respectively (Gentry et al. 2004).”

    From Bos grunniens and Bos mutus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2009) · cites this paper as Gentry et al. 2004

  • Bos grunniens and Bos mutus are the domestic and wild forms, respectively, of the yak.

    “Bos grunniens Linnaeus, 1766, and Bos mutus (Przewalski, 1883) are the domestic and wild forms, respectively, of the bovid commonly called the yak.”

    From Bos grunniens and Bos mutus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2009) · cites this paper as Gentry et al. 2004

  • Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus are the domestic and wild forms, respectively, of the bovid commonly called the gaur.

    “Bos frontalis Lambert, 1804 and Bos gaurus Hamilton-Smith, 1827 are the domestic and wild forms, respectively, of the bovid commonly called the gaur.”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Gentry et al. 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Gentry, A., Clutton-Brock, J., & Groves, C. P.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Gentry, Anthea
ORCID
Groves, Colin P
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
645-651
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jas.2003.10.006
OpenAlex
W2001335566
Cited by
216
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Linguistic and Cultural Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Natural History
Keywords
zoological nomenclature, domestic animals, domestication, Linnaean taxonomy, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, specific names, mammals, Systema Naturae, nomenclatural priority

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review