CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Taphonomy and negative results: An integrated approach to ceramic-bound protein residue analysis

Barker, Andrew, Dombrosky, Jonathan, Venables, Barney, Wolverton, Steve·2018·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While some success from extracting proteins from ceramics has been reported, challenges have arisen in removal of protein from the silica matrix and protein preservation in this context is not fully understood.

    “While some success from extracting proteins from ceramics has been reported (117–120), challenges have arisen in the removal of protein from the silica matrix and protein preservation in this context is not fully understood (7, 121, 122).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [122]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Barker, 2015, Validation of a non-targeted LC-MS approach for identifying ancient proteins: method development on bone to improve artifact residue analysis, Ethnobiology Letters, 6, 162, 10.14237/ebl.6.1.2015.294 · DOI
  2. Barker, 2012, An optimized approach for protein residue extraction and identification from ceramics after cooking, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 19, 407, 10.1007/s10816-011-9120-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barnard, 2007, Mixed results of seven methods for organic residue analysis applied to one vessel with the residue of a known foodstuff, J. Archaeol. Sci., 34, 28, 10.1016/j.jas.2006.03.010 · DOI
  4. Buckley, 2010, Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide, J. Archaeol. Sci., 37, 13, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Buckley, 2013, Proteomics analysis of ancient food vessel stitching reveals >4000-year-old milk protein, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 27, 531, 10.1002/rcm.6481 · DOI
  6. Buckley, 2017, A fossil protein chimera; difficulties in discriminating dinosaur peptide sequences from modern cross-contamination, Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 284
  7. Cappellini, 2010, A multidisciplinary study of archaeological grape seeds, Naturwissenschaften, 97, 205, 10.1007/s00114-009-0629-3 · DOI
  8. Cappellini, 2012, Proteomic analysis of a pleistocene mammoth femur reveals more than one hundred ancient bone proteins, J. Proteome Res., 11, 917, 10.1021/pr200721u · DOI
  9. Collins, 1995, A basic mathematical simulation of the chemical degradation of ancient collagen, J. Archaeol. Sci., 22, 175, 10.1006/jasc.1995.0019 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Craig, 2000, Detecting milk proteins in ancient pots, Nature, 408, 312, 10.1038/35042684 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Craig, 2002, The removal of protein from mineral surfaces: implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials, J. Archaeol. Sci., 29, 1077, 10.1006/jasc.2001.0757 · DOI
  12. Craig, 2005, The identification of prehistoric dairying activities in the Western isles of scotland: an integrated biomolecular approach, J. Archaeol. Sci., 32, 91, 10.1016/j.jas.2004.06.009 · DOI
  13. Crown, 2009, Evidence of cacao use in the prehispanic American Southwest, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am., 106, 2110, 10.1073/pnas.0812817106 · DOI
  14. Crown, 2015, Ritual drinks in the pre-hispanic US southwest and mexican Northwest, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am., 112, 11436, 10.1073/pnas.1511799112 · DOI
  15. Davídek, 1990, vol. 21
  16. Dobberstein, 2009, Archaeological collagen: why Worry about collagen diagenesis?, Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci, 1, 31, 10.1007/s12520-009-0002-7 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Eerkens, 2005, GC-MS analysis and fatty acid ratios of archaeological potsherds from the Western great basin of North America, Archaeometry, 47, 83, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2005.00189.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Efremov, 1940, Taphonomy: a new branch of paleontology, Pan-American Geologist, 74, 81
  19. Evershed, 2008, Experimental approaches to the interpretation of absorbed organic residues in archaeological ceramics, World Archaeol., 40, 26, 10.1080/00438240801889373 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Evershed, 2008, Organic residue analysis in archaeology: the archaeological biomarker revolution, Archaeometry, 50, 895, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00446.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gifford, 1981, Taphonomy and paleoecology: a critical review of Archaeology's sister disciplines, Adv. Archaeol. Meth. Theor., 4, 365, 10.1016/B978-0-12-003104-7.50013-2 · DOI
  22. Heaton, 2009, Towards the application of desorption electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (DESI-MS) to the analysis of ancient proteins from artefacts, J. Archaeol. Sci., 36, 2145, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.016 · DOI
  23. Hendy, 2016, The challenge of identifying tuberculosis proteins in archaeological tissues, J. Archaeol. Sci., 66, 146, 10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hollemeyer, 2008, Species identification of Oetzi's clothing with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry based on peptide pattern similarities of hair digests, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 22, 2751, 10.1002/rcm.3679 · DOI
  25. Lee, 2009, Functions and evolution of selenoprotein methionine sulfoxide reductases, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj., 1790, 1471, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.04.014 · DOI
  26. Leo, 2011, Deamidation at asparagine and glutamine as a major modification upon deterioration/aging of proteinaceous binders in mural paintings, Anal. Chem., 83, 2056, 10.1021/ac1027275 · DOI
  27. Lyman, 2010, What taphonomy is, what it Isn't, and why taphonomists should care about the difference, J. Taphonomy, 8, 1
  28. Marlar, 2000, Biochemical evidence of cannibalism at a prehistoric puebloan site in southwestern Colorado, Nature, 407, 74, 10.1038/35024064 · DOI
  29. Noble, 2007, A comparison of protein quantitation assays for biopharmaceutical applications, Mol. Biotechnol., 37, 99, 10.1007/s12033-007-0038-9 · DOI
  30. Pfretzschner, 2006, Collagen gelatinization: the key to understand early bone-diagenesis, Palaeontograph. Abteilung: Palaozoologie - Stratigraphie, 278, 135, 10.1127/pala/278/2006/135 · DOI
  31. Schweitzer, 2009, Biomolecular characterization and protein sequences of the campanian hadrosaur B. canadensis, Science, 324, 626, 10.1126/science.1165069 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Solazzo, 2008, Identification of protein remains in archaeological potsherds by proteomics, Anal. Chem., 80, 4590, 10.1021/ac800515v · DOI · Paper page
  33. Solazzo, 2011, Proteomics and coast salish blankets: a tale of shaggy dogs?, Antiquity, 85, 1418, 10.1017/S0003598X00062141 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Vizcaíno, 2014, ProteomeXchange provides globally co-ordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination, Nat. Biotechnol., 30, 223, 10.1038/nbt.2839 · DOI
  35. Washburn, 2013, Cacao consumption during the 8th century at alkali ridge, southeastern Utah, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 2007, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.017 · DOI
  36. Welker, 2015, Ancient proteins resolve the evolutionary history of Darwin's south american ungulates, Nature, 522, 81, 10.1038/nature14249 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Welker, 2016, Palaeoproteomic Evidence Identifies Archaic Hominins Associated with the Châtelperronian at the Grotte du Renne, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am., 113, 11162, 10.1073/pnas.1605834113 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Wiktorowicz, 2017, Hemorrhagic fever virus, human blood, and tissues in iron age mortuary vessels, J. Archaeol. Sci., 78, 29, 10.1016/j.jas.2016.11.009 · DOI
  39. Wiśniewski, 2009, Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis, Br. J. Pharmacol., 6, 359

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barker, A., Dombrosky, J., Venables, B., & Wolverton, S.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
94
Pages
32-43
ISSN
0305-4403
DOI
10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.004
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
NSF Archaeometry Technical Development Grant BCS (1112615)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review