Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Locational preferences and spatial arrangement in the barrow landscape of Serra do Barbanza (North-western Iberia)

Carrero-Pazos, Miguel, Bustelo-Abuín, Julián, Barbeito-Pose, Víctor, Rodríguez-Rellán, Carlos·2020·Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102351

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Barbanza, the relationship between the distribution of prehistoric burial mounds and natural mobility routes has been verified in several different ways, including optimal paths and wall-to-wall approaches.

    “In the case of Barbanza, this relationship has been verified in several different ways, including various digital modelling techniques such as optimal paths and”

    From Exploring the inherent affordability for movement in past landscapes (2027) · cites this paper as Carrero-Pazos et al., 2020

  • Only a few studies have combined point interaction with environmental properties, and those primarily employed Gibbs processes.

    “Only a few studies have combined point interaction with environmental properties, and those primarily employed Gibbs processes (e.g., Carrero-Pazos et al., 2020;Eve and Crema, 2014).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Baddeley, 1995, Area-Interaction point processes, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 47, 601, 10.1007/BF01856536 · DOI
  2. Barbeito Pose, 2015, Ocupacións domésticas na Serra do Barbanza: resultados preliminares, Gallaecia, 34, 125
  3. Barbeito Pose, 2018, Do planalto ás terras baixas: novas achegas á ocupación da península do Barbanza dende a Prehistoria ata o Medievo, Gallaecia, 37, 1
  4. Bello Diéguez, 1982, Aproximación a un modelo económico-social del megalitismo del noroeste peninsular, Brigantium, 3, 33
  5. Bello Diéguez, 1982, Megalitismo y medio físico en el Noroeste de la Península Ibérica: Estado de la cuestión y perspectivas, Zephyrus, XXXIV–XXXV, 109
  6. Bradley, 1991, Rock art and the perception of landscape, Cambridge Archaeol. J., 1, 77, 10.1017/S0959774300000263 · DOI
  7. Brughmans, 2018, Introducing visual neighbourhood configurations for total viewsheds, J. Archaeol. Sci., 96, 14, 10.1016/j.jas.2018.05.006 · DOI
  8. Bustelo Abuín, 2017, Alén da Serra. O fenómeno tumular na Península do Barbanza a través dos SIX e a estatística espacial, Gallecia, 37, 53
  9. Carrero-Pazos, 2018, Beyond the scale. Building formal approaches for the study of spatial patterns in Galician moundscapes (NW Iberian Peninsula), J. Archaeolog. Sci.: Rep., 19, 538
  10. Carrero-Pazos, 2018, Modelando dinámicas de movilidad y visibilidad en los paisajes megalíticos gallegos. El caso del Monte de Santa Mariña y su entorno (Comarca de Sarria, Lugo), Trabajos de Prehistoria, 75, 287, 10.3989/tp.2018.12216 · DOI
  11. Carrero-Pazos, 2015, Definiendo patrones de emplazamiento del Megalitismo gallego: la necrópolis del Monte de Santa Mariña como modelo, Sémata. Ciencias Sociais e Humanidades, 27, 299
  12. Carrero-Pazos, 2019, The spatial structure of Galician megalithic landscapes (NW Iberia): a case study from the Monte Penide Region, J. Archaeol. Sci., 108, 10.1016/j.jas.2019.05.004 · DOI
  13. Castillo López, 1927, Un depósito de hachas del bronce de talón, Boletín de la Real academia Galega, 17, 33
  14. Criado Boado, 1980, Catalogación de mámoas en los municipios de Curtis, Sobrado y tierras adyacentes, Brigantium, 1, 13
  15. Criado Boado, 1984, El tercer factor o la lógica oculta del emplazamiento de los túmulos megalíticos gallegos, Cuadernos de Estudios Gallegos, 35, 7
  16. Criado Boado, 1988, Mámoas y rozas: panorámica general sobre la distribución de los túmulos megalíticos gallegos, Trabalhos de Antropologia e Etnologia, 28, 151
  17. Criado Boado, 1981, Relación entre la distribución de mámoas y el medio físico de la zona de Sobrado-Curtis, Brigantium, 2, 7
  18. Criado Boado, 1988, Proyecto Bocelo-Furelos: arqueología del paisaje y prospección intensiva en Galicia, Trabalhos de Antropologia e Etnologia, 28, 241
  19. Criado Boado, 2000, Monumentalising landscape: from present perception to past meaning of Galician Megalithism (North-West Iberian Peninsula), Eur. J. Archaeol., 3, 188, 10.1179/eja.2000.3.2.188 · DOI
  20. De Reu, 2011, Measuring the relative topographic position of archaeological sites in the landscape, a case study on the Bronze Age barrows in northwest Belgium, J. Archaeol. Sci., 38, 3435, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.005 · DOI
  21. Díaz Sanjurjo, 1904, Los caminos antiguos y el itinerario n° 18 de Antonino en la provincia de Orense, Boletín de la Comisión de Monumentos Históricos y Artísticos de Orense, 2, 37
  22. Fábrega-Álvarez, 2007, Proposal for an archaeological analysis of pathways and movement, Archeologia e Calcolatori, 18, 121
  23. Fábrega-Álvarez, 2019, Now you see me. An assessment of the visual recognition and control of individuals in archaeological landscapes, J. Archaeol. Sci., 104, 56, 10.1016/j.jas.2019.02.002 · DOI
  24. Fábregas Valcarce, 2002, O Megalitismo na comarca de Deza. Un proxecto para a conservación do patrimonio arqueolóxico inmoble. Descubrindo, Anuario de estudios e investigación de Deza, 4, 107
  25. Fábregas Valcarce, 2003, Estudios en torno ao Megalitismo da comarca do Deza. Primeiros resultados. Descubrindo, Anuario de estudios e investigación de Deza, 5, 91
  26. Fábregas Valcarce, 2004, O Megalitismo da Comarca do Deza. Resultados e perspectivas. Descubrindo, Anuario de estudios e investigación de Deza, 6, 41
  27. Filgueiras Rey, 1994, Túmulos y petroglifos. La construcción de un espacio funerario. Aproximación a sus implicaciones simbólicas. Estudio en la Galicia centro-oriental: Samos y Sarria, Espacio Tiempo y Forma (Serie I, Prehistoria y Arqueología), 7, 211
  28. Guisan, 1999, GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution, Plant Ecol., 143, 107, 10.1023/A:1009841519580 · DOI
  29. Kvamme, 1983, Computer processing techniques for regional modeling of archaeological site locations, Adv. Comput. Archaeol., 1, 26
  30. López Cuevillas, 1925, As mámoas do Concello de Lobeira, Boletín de la Real Academia Gallega XV, 25
  31. Maciñeira, 1935, La distribución de las estaciones prehistóricas ortegaleses y sus características, Boletín de la Real academia Galega, 259, 169
  32. Maciñeira, 1943, Túmulos prehistóricos. Inventario descriptivo de los 286 túmulos prehistóricos hasta ahora descubiertos en la avanzada comarca del cabo Ortegal, Boletín de la Real Academia Gallega, 23–24, 15
  33. Murrieta-Flores, 2012, Understanding movement during late prehistory through spatial technologies: the role of natural areas of transit in south-western Iberia, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 69, 114
  34. Roese, 1980, Some aspects of topographical location of Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments in Wales, 1: menhirs, Bull. Board Celtic Stud., 28, 645
  35. Rodríguez Casal, 1998, El Fenómeno tumular y megalítico en las tierras de Sarria-O Incio (Lugo), Gallaecia, 17, 69
  36. Rodríguez Rellán, 2015, Arte rupestre galaica: unha achega dende a estatística espacial e os SIX, Sémata Ciencias Sociais e Humanidade, 27, 323
  37. Rodríguez Rellán, 2018, Cifras e imágenes: una aproximación cuantitativa a los petroglifos gallegos, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 75, 109, 10.3989/tp.2018.12206 · DOI
  38. Santos Estévez, 1997, De la arqueología simbólica del paisaje a la arqueología de los paisajes sagrados, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 54, 61, 10.3989/tp.1997.v54.i2.366 · DOI
  39. Steelman, 2005, Direct radiocarbon dating of megalithicpaints from north-west Iberia, Antiquity, 79, 379, 10.1017/S0003598X00114164 · DOI
  40. Vaquero Lastres, 1990, Ríos y tumbas. Sobre el emplazamiento de túmulos en el NW peninsular, Trabalhos de Antropologia e Etnologia, XXX, 151
  41. Vaquero Lastres, J., 1993–1994. Galiñeiro, paso de lobos, novios y héroes. Sobre el emplazamiento de los túmulos del Noroeste. Cuadernos de Estudios Gallegos XLI(106), 11–39. · DOI
  42. Villoch Vázquez, 1995, Monumentos y petroglifos: la construcción del espacio en las sociedades constructoras de túmulos del noroeste peninsular, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 52, 39, 10.3989/tp.1995.v52.i1.430 · DOI
  43. Villoch Vázquez, 1998, Un nuevo menhir en Cristal, Gallaecia, 17, 107
  44. Weiss, A., 2001. Topographic position and landforms analysis. In: ESRI User Conference, San Diego. Poster presentation.
  45. Wheatley, D., 1996. The use of GIS to understand regional variation in Neolithic Wessex. In: Maschner, H.D.G. (Ed.). New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research. CAI Occasional Paper 23. Carbondale, Illinois, pp. 75–103.
  46. Wheatley, 2010, The megalithic phenomenon in Southern Spain: approaching the landscape dimension, Oxford J. Archaeol., 29, 387, 10.1111/j.1468-0092.2010.00354.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. Wright, 2014, Analysis of feature intervisibility and cumulative visibility using GIS, Bayesian and spatial statistics: a study from the Mandara Mountains, Northern Cameroon, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0112191 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carrero-Pazos, M., Bustelo-Abuín, J., Barbeito-Pose, V., & Rodríguez-Rellán, C.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
31
Pages
102351
ISSN
2352-409X
Cited by
4
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review