The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do long-term institutional investors promote corporate social responsibility activities?
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Institutional investors that engage in ESG appear to have distinct characteristics relative to their peers that do not incorporate sustainability considerations in their investment decisions.”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Kim et al. (2019)
In the citing paper
“Kim et al. (2019) find that CSR activities are mainly promoted by the presence of active rather than passive long-term institutions.”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Kim et al. (2019)
In the citing paper
“Glossner (2019) and Kim et al. (2019)find that investors with longer investment horizons improve firms' ESG performance.”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Kim et al. (2019)
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
What Matters in Corporate Governance?
Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn099 · Cited by 2,906
Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy
Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhu082 · Cited by 1,020
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Aghion, 2013, Innovation and institutional ownership, Am. Econ. Rev., 103, 277, 10.1257/aer.103.1.277 · DOI
- Agle, 1999, Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values, Acad. Manag. J., 42, 507, 10.2307/256973 · DOI
- Almazan, 2005, Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: evidence from executive compensation, Financ. Manag., 34, 5, 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2005.tb00116.x · DOI
- Amihud, 2002, Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects, J. Financ. Markets, 5, 31, 10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6 · DOI
- Attig, 2013, Institutional investment horizons and the cost of equity capital, Financ. Manag., 42, 441, 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01221.x · DOI
- Attig, 2015, Managerial practices and corporate social responsibility, J. Bus. Ethics, 131, 121, 10.1007/s10551-014-2273-x · DOI
- Benabou, 2010, Individual and corporate social responsibility, Economica, 77, 1, 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x · DOI · Paper page
- Brine, 2007, Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in the Australian context, Econ. Round-up, 47
- Bushee, 1998, The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior, Account. Rev., 73, 305, 10.2308/TAR-902584 · DOI
- Bushee, 2000, Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility, J. Account. Res., 38, 171, 10.2307/2672914 · DOI
- Chen, 2007, Monitoring: which institutions matter?, J. Financ. Econ., 86, 279, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.005 · DOI
- Choi, 2012, Why does financial strength forecast stock returns? Evidence from subsequent demand by institutional investors, Rev. Financ. Stud., 25, 1550, 10.1093/rfs/hhs001 · DOI
- Cornell, 1987, Corporate stakeholder and corporate finance, Financ. Manag., 16, 5, 10.2307/3665543 · DOI
- Cornett, 2007, The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance, J. Bank. Finance, 31, 1771, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.08.006 · DOI
- Deng, 2013, Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: evidence from mergers, J. Financ. Econ., 110, 87, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.014 · DOI
- Di Giuli, 2014, Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility, J. Financ. Econ., 111, 158, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.002 · DOI
- Edmans, 2011, Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices, J. Financ. Econ., 101, 621, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021 · DOI · Paper page
- Edmans, 2012, The link between job satisfaction and firm value, with implications for corporate social responsibility, Acad. Manag. Perspect., 26, 1, 10.5465/amp.2012.0046 · DOI
- Eisfeldt, 2013, Organization capital and the cross-section of expected returns, J. Finance, 68, 1365, 10.1111/jofi.12034 · DOI
- El Ghoul, 2011, Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?, J. Bank. Finance, 35, 2388, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Feldman, 1997, Does improving a firm's environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price?, J. Invest., 6, 87, 10.3905/joi.1997.87 · DOI
- Ferrell, 2016, Socially responsible firms, J. Financ. Econ., 122, 585, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003 · DOI
- Flammer, 2015, Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization, Strategic Manag. J., 36, 1469, 10.1002/smj.2307 · DOI
- Flammer, 2015, Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach, Manag. Sci., 61, 2549, 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038 · DOI · Paper page
- Freeman, 2004, Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited, Organ. Sci., 15, 364, 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066 · DOI
- Gaspar, 2005, Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control, J. Financ. Econ., 76, 135, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.002 · DOI
- Gaspar, 2013, Payout policy choices and shareholder investment horizons, Rev. Finance, 17, 261, 10.1093/rof/rfr040 · DOI
- Gillan, 2000, Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors, J. Financ. Econ., 57, 275, 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00058-1 · DOI
- Giroud, 2015, Capital and labor reallocation within firms, J. Finance, 70, 1767, 10.1111/jofi.12254 · DOI
- Graves, 1994, Institutional owners and corporate social performance, Acad. Manag. J., 37, 1034, 10.2307/256611 · DOI
- Heal, 2005, Corporate social responsibility: an economic and financial framework, Geneva Pap. Risk Insurance Issues Pract., 30, 387, 10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510037 · DOI
- Hill, 1992, Stakeholder‐agency theory, J. Manag. Stud., 29, 131, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x · DOI
- Hillman, 2001, Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line, Strategic Manag. J., 22, 125, 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- Hong, 2009, The price of sin: the effects of social norms on markets, J. Financ. Econ., 93, 15, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Jacob, 2016, Corporate finance and the governance implications of removing government support programs, J. Bank. Finance, 63, 35, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.005 · DOI
- Jawahar, 2001, Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach, Acad. Manage. Rev., 26, 397, 10.5465/amr.2001.4845803 · DOI
- Jensen, 1976, Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, J. Financ. Econ., 3, 305, 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
- Jensen, 1986, Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, Am. Econ. Rev., 76, 323
- Jensen, 2001, Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function, J. Appl. Corp. Finance, 14, 8, 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2001.tb00434.x · DOI
- Jiraporn, 2014, Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings? Evidence from geographic identification, Financ. Manag., 43, 505, 10.1111/fima.12044 · DOI
- Johnson, 1999, The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance, Acad. Manag. J., 42, 564, 10.2307/256977 · DOI
- Kim, 2012, Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility, Account. Rev., 87, 761, 10.2308/accr-10209 · DOI
- Kim, 2017, Corporate social responsibility and internal control effectiveness, Asia-Pac. J. Financ. St., 46, 341, 10.1111/ajfs.12172 · DOI
- Kim, 2019, Do long-term institutional investors foster corporate innovation?, Account. Finance, 10.1111/acfi.12284 · DOI
- Kruger, 2015, Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth, J. Financ. Econ., 115, 304, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Mahapatra, 1984, Investor reaction to corporate social accounting, J. Bus. Financ. Account., 11, 29, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1984.tb00054.x · DOI
- McCarthy, 2017, Corporate social responsibility and CEO confidence, J. Bank. Finance, 75, 280, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.024 · DOI
- Oikonomou, 2012, The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: a longitudinal analysis, Financ. Manag., 41, 483, 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01190.x · DOI
- Rosenbaum, 1983, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for casual effects, Biometrika, 70, 41, 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
- Shane, 1983, Market response to environment information produced outside the firm, Account. Rev., 58, 521, 10.2308/TAR-4486747 · DOI
- Sharfman, 2008, Environmental risk management and the cost of capital, Strategic Manag. J., 29, 569, 10.1002/smj.678 · DOI · Paper page
- Stulz, 1990, Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies, J. Financ. Econ., 26, 3, 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90011-N · DOI
- Tirole, 2001, Corporate governance, Econometrica, 62, 1, 10.1111/1468-0262.00177 · DOI
- Titman, 1984, The effect of capital structure on a firm's liquidation decision, J. Financ. Econ., 13, 137, 10.1016/0304-405X(84)90035-7 · DOI
- Turban, 1997, Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees, Acad. Manag. J., 40, 658, 10.2307/257057 · DOI · Paper page
- Waddock, 1997, The corporate social performance–financial performance link, Strategic Manag. J., 18, 303, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI · Paper page
- Yan, 2009, Institutional investors and equity returns: are short-term institutions better informed, Rev. Financ. Stud., 22, 893, 10.1093/revfin/hhl046 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–222 of 222
Institutional Investor Horizon and CSR Peer Imitation
Bhattacharya, D., Li, W., Nguyen, N. H., & Peng, S.-C. (2026) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.70766
Long-term Investor Value Appropriation and Stock Price Crash Risk
Chung, C.-N.-Y., Pham, H., & Yahya, F. (2026) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2026.110327
Li, H., Lv, X., Wang, Y., Zhao, X., & Dong, W. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07750-7
“Following Kim et al. (2019b), we use PSM to compare fi rms that are similar in all observable characteristics except for their exposure to green institutional investors.”
Moreno-García, M., Fernandez-Olit, B., Mañas-Alcón, E., & Montes‐Pineda, Ó. (2026) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.70718
Responsible investors and green innovation
Huang, B., Tian, S., Yang, E., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Global Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2026.101291
Focke, M. (2026) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.71077
Fitria, M. (2026) · Journal of Sharia Economics, Banking and Accounting · doi:10.52620/jseba.v3i1.359
“Untuk memahami hubungan antara cash holding dengan karakteristik perusahaan tersebut, literatur yang ada menunjukkan beberapa teori penjelas, yaitu teori trade-off , teori pecking order dan teori keagenan (Jani et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2019).”
Institutional investors and MNE establishment mode choice
Zhao, Y., Parente, R., Xu, L., & Gambirage, C. (2026) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116072
Blockholder Network Centrality and Strategic Environmental Disclosure
Liu, J.-N., Man, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, R. (2026) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2026.109947
Limited impacts of shareholder pressure on climate strategy of fossil firms
Lomov, D., & Mahdavi, P. (2026) · Business and Politics · doi:10.1017/bap.2025.10021
Institutional characteristics, board connectedness, and corporate social responsibility
Le, H., & Vo, L. V. (2026) · International Journal of Disclosure and Governance · doi:10.1057/s41310-026-00358-y
What drives corporate ESG? Disentangling the importance of investors and managers
Bermejo, V. J., Rizzo, A. E., & Zakriya, M. (2026) · Journal of Financial Intermediation · doi:10.1016/j.jfi.2026.101194 · Cited by 2
Can Good Doers Perform Well? Novel Evidence From Corporate Innovation
Truong, Q., Tran, Q., Chen, R., & Chan, C.-Y. (2025) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.70116 · Cited by 1
Determinants of corporate social responsibility in Tunisian context
Jedidi, A., & Hadriche, M. (2025) · Business and Management Theory and Practice · doi:10.54517/bmtp3210
“Others show a positive impact, such as Kim et al. [40].”
Wismansyah, A., Kadir, A. R., Baja, S., & Amar, M. (2024) · Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development · doi:10.24294/jipd.v8i5.3773
Stock liquidity and stock price crash risk: evidence from China
Zhang, P., Qu, Z.-L., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2024.2348185
“Due to their focus on short-APPLIED term performance, short-term institutional investors may unintentionally foster opportunistic behaviour among company management (H. D. Kim et al. 2019).”
Concentrated Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights from Indian Companies
Potharla, S. (2023) · The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.33312/ijar.697
“These key players can serve as stewards by concentrating on value generation and risk reduction over the long term (Kim et al., 2019).”
Institutional Ownership and a Firm’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Na, J., & Kim, H.-D. (2023) · Korean Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.26845/kjfs.2023.8.52.4.497
Self-citationFirm Misvaluation and Corporate Social Responsibility*
Jin, Y. (2022) · Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.1111/ajfs.12373
A Contradiction of Corporate Social Responsibility in Moderating Tax Avoidance
Mary, H., Pratiwi, N., & Agusti, A. (2022) · GOVERNORS · doi:10.47709/governors.v1i1.1672
“Institutional Ownership or institutional ownership, namely the proportion of share ownership owned by institutions such as insurance, banks, or other institutions at the end of the year (Kim et al, 2019).”
BackgroundInstitutional Investors, CSR Report Readability and the Moderating Role of ESG Performance
Gao, F. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4868707
Park, N. Y. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.1111/ajfs.12312
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H.-D., Kim, T., Kim, Y., & Park, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Seoul (KR)
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Kwangwoo
- Venue
- Journal of Banking & Finance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 101
- Pages
- 256-269
- ISSN
- 0378-4266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903431834
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 16.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Banking & Finance (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
- Keywords
- long-term institutional investors, corporate social responsibility, investment horizon, investor monitoring, CSR ratings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review