Cited by 70Machine Learning in HealthcareAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksRecommender Systems and Techniques

MedGCN: Medication recommendation and lab test imputation via graph convolutional networks

Open access
Mao, Chengsheng, Yao, Liang, Luo, Yuan·2022·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Laboratory testing and medication prescription are two of the most important routines in daily clinical practice. Developing an artificial intelligence system that can automatically make lab test imputations and medication recommendations can save costs on potentially redundant lab tests and inform physicians of a more effective prescription. We present an intelligent medical system (named MedGCN) that can automatically recommend the patients' medications based on their incomplete lab tests, and can even accurately estimate the lab values that have not been taken. In our system, we integrate the complex relations between multiple types of medical entities with their inherent features in a heterogeneous graph. Then we model the graph to learn a distributed representation for each entity in the graph based on graph convolutional networks (GCN). By the propagation of graph convolutional networks, the entity representations can incorporate multiple types of medical information that can benefit multiple medical tasks. Moreover, we introduce a cross regularization strategy to reduce overfitting for multi-task training by the interaction between the multiple tasks. In this study, we construct a graph to associate 4 types of medical entities, i.e., patients, encounters, lab tests, and medications, and applied a graph neural network to learn node embeddings for medication recommendation and lab test imputation. we validate our MedGCN model on two real-world datasets: NMEDW and MIMIC-III. The experimental results on both datasets demonstrate that our model can outperform the state-of-the-art in both tasks. We believe that our innovative system can provide a promising and reliable way to assist physicians to make medication prescriptions and to save costs on potentially redundant lab tests.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104000

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A cell-to-tissue graph can capture cell morphology and interactions, tissue morphology and spatial distribution, cell-to-tissue hierarchies, and spatial distribution of cells with respect to tissues, and a hierarchical GNN can learn representations from these modalities.

    “Further, cell morphology and interactions, tissue morphology and spatial distribution, cell-to-tissue hierarchies, and spatial distribution of cells with respect to tissues can be captured in a cell-to-tissue graph, upon which a hierarchical GNN can learn representations using these different data modalities [189].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [189]

  • Deep graph learning has been shown to detect subtle signs of disease progression in medical images while integrating other modalities such as tissue localization and genomic features.

    “Deep graph learning has been shown to detect subtle signs of disease progression in the images while integrating other modalities (e.g., tissue localization [189] and genomic features [8]) to improve medical image processing.”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [189]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [6]Zhang Yutao, Chen Robert, Tang Jie, Stewart Walter F, and Sun Jimeng. Leap: learning to prescribe effective and safe treatment combinations for multimorbidity. In proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge Discovery and data Mining, pages 1315– 1324. ACM, 2017.
  2. [12]Kipf Thomas N and Welling Max. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  3. [13]Hamilton Will, Ying Zhitao, and Leskovec Jure. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 1024– 1034, 2017.
  4. [14]Chen Jie, Ma Tengfei, and Xiao Cao. FastGCN: Fast learning with graph convolutional networks via importance sampling. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  5. [38]Hamilton William L, Ying Rex, and Leskovec Jure. Representation learning on graphs: Methods and applications. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 40(3): 52– 74, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mao, C., Yao, L., & Luo, Y.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Luo, Yuan
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
127
Pages
104000
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210277067
Cited by
70
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5UL1TR001422, N1R21LM012618)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
drug recommendation, graph convolutional networks, heterogeneous graphs, multi-task learning, node embeddings, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Learning, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review