Cited by 54Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Augmentation of Treatment As Usual with online Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation training in adolescents with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A pilot study

Salemink, Elske, Wolters, Lidewij, de Haan, Else·2015·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for children and adolescents with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is effective. However, since almost half of patients remain symptomatic after treatment, there remains room for improvement. Cognitive Bias Modification training of Interpretations (CBM-I) is a promising new intervention, as it targets misinterpretation of intrusions, which is seen as an important characteristic in OCD. To date, there have been no published studies of CBM-I in adolescents with OCD. The aim of the current pilot study was to examine the added value of online CBM-I training as an adjunctive treatment to the Treatment As Usual (TAU; that included CBT and pharmacotherapy) in adolescents with OCD.Methods Patients receiving TAU were randomly assigned to either an additional CBM-I training (n = 9), or to an additional placebo variant of this procedure (n = 7).Results Immediate, on-line interpretations changed in response to the CBM-I training, while no such effects were observed on slower retrospective off-line interpretations. Patients in the CBM-I training condition reported fewer obsessive compulsive symptoms after training, and clinicians rated them as having fewer obsessive symptoms (corresponding to medium-large effect sizes). No such changes were observed in the placebo group.Limitations The small sample size precludes strong conclusions and replication is necessary to test the robustness of the findings.Conclusions This small randomized controlled trial is suggestive, although not conclusive, regarding the promising additive value of OC-related CBM-I training as an adjunctive intervention to TAU in an adolescent clinical population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salemink, E., Wolters, L., & de Haan, E.
Affiliations
  • De Bascule (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Salemink, Elske
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
49
Issue
Pt A
Pages
112-119
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005201699
Cited by
54
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dutch Scientific Foundation (NWO VENI 451-10-029)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, adolescents, online training, adjunctive therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, intrusive thoughts, misinterpretation, usual care, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Online Systems, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reaction Time, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Bias, Treatment Outcome, Recognition, Psychology, Feedback, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review