Cited by 47Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Modification of Information-Processing Biases in Emotional Disorders: Clinically Relevant Developments in Experimental Psychopathology

Baert, Saskia, Koster, Ernst H.W., De Raedt, Rudi·2011·International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/ijct.2011.4.2.208

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baert, S., Koster, E. H. W., & De Raedt, R.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Venue
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Published
2011-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
208-222
ISSN
1937-1209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157454115
Cited by
47
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cognitive Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cognitive bias modification, information processing biases, anxiety, depression, emotional disorders, cognitive training, attentional bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review