The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10073 · Cited by 5,916
The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms
Dellarocas, C. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308 · Cited by 3,433
The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 · Cited by 2,913
Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior
Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209118 · Cited by 2,378
The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices
Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001 · Cited by 1,585
Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context
Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467050032005 · Cited by 1,334
A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces
Bakos, J. Y. (1991) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249641 · Cited by 1,224
A Dyadic Study of Interpersonal Information Search
Gilly, M. C., Graham, J. L., Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Yale, L. J. (1998) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070398262001 · Cited by 735
Word-of-mouth effects on short-term and long-term product judgments
Bone, P. F. (1995) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(94)00047-i · Cited by 716
Cited by
The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model
Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008 · Cited by 2,005
What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature
King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001 · Cited by 1,017
Filieri, R. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.006 · Cited by 1,083
What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites
Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.020 · Cited by 963
Zhang, K. Z. K., Zhao, S. J., Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2014) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.08.005 · Cited by 781
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, P., & Harris, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 1041-1049
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076576373
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 24.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.015
- The paper
- Gupta, P., & Harris, J. (2010). How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
