Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,933

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory

Woodside, Arch G.·2013·Journal of Business Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Armstrong, 1970, How to avoid exploratory research, Journal of Advertising Research, 10, 27
  2. Armstrong, J. S. (in press). Illusions in regression analysis. International Journal of Forecasting.
  3. Cooper, 1992, The NewProd System: The industry experience, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 113, 10.1016/0737-6782(92)90003-U · DOI
  4. Cooper, 2007, Winning businesses in product development: The critical success factors, Research-Technology Management, 50, 52, 10.1080/08956308.2007.11657441 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gigerenzer, 1991, From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology, Psychological Review, 98, 254, 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.254 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gigerenzer, 2009, Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences, Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107, 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gladwell, 1996, The tipping point, The New Yorker, 72, 32
  8. Goldstein, 2009, Fast and frugal forecasting, International Journal of Forecasting, 25, 760, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lazarsfeld, 1937, Some remarks on the typological procedures in social research, Zeitschrift fur Sozialforschung, 6, 119, 10.5840/zfs193761137 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mauro, 1995, Corruption and growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681, 10.2307/2946696 · DOI · Paper page
  11. McClelland, 1998, Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews, Psychological Science, 9, 331, 10.1111/1467-9280.00065 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Pant, 1990, Innocents in the forest: Forecasting and research methods, Journal of Management, 16, 433, 10.1177/014920639001600209 · DOI
  13. Ragin, 2006, Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research, Comparative Social Research, 16, 27
  14. Roberts, 2000, How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing, Psychological Review, 107, 358, 10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.358 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.358 · Paper page
  15. Woodside, 2011, Responding to the severe limitations of cross-sectional surveys: Commenting on Rong and Wilkinson's perspectives, Australasian Marketing Journal, 19, 153, 10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.04.004 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,933

Metadata

Authors
Woodside, A. G.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
463-472
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091957194
Cited by
1,933
References
0
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
The paper
Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.