The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does digital transformation improve the firm’s performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651257 · Cited by 12,583
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · Cited by 10,220
The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700601 · Cited by 3,451
Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective
Holmstrom, B. (1999) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00083 · Cited by 3,172
The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018 · Cited by 3,089
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12639 · Cited by 2,550
Americans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle
Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Reenen, J. V. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.167 · Cited by 1,028
Cited by
Digital transformation and manufacturing companies’ ESG responsibility performance
Wang, H., Jiao, S., Bu, K., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104370 · Cited by 210
Self-citationCorporate digital transformation and labor structure upgrading
Dou, B., Guo, S., Chang, X., & Wang, Y. (2023) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102904 · Cited by 193
Self-citationDigital Transformation, Board Diversity, and Corporate Sustainable Development
Zhang, C., Tian, X., Sun, X., Xu, J., & Gao, Y. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16177788 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, X., Li, M., Wang, Y., & Mardani, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 163
- Pages
- 113868
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4362703701
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 119.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
