Cited by 51Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNoise Effects and Management

Case study: A novel application of mindfulness- and acceptance-based components to treat misophonia

Schneider, Rebecca L., Arch, Joanna J.·2017·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.04.003

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, R. L., & Arch, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Schneider, Rebecca L.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
221-225
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604974427
Cited by
51
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
misophonia, mindfulness, acceptance and commitment therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, anger, disgust, sound sensitivity, adolescents, psychotherapy treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review