Cited by 206Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for social phobia: Outcomes and moderators

Open access
Craske, Michelle G., Niles, Andrea N., Burklund, Lisa J., Wolitzky-Taylor, Kate B., Vilardaga, Jennifer C. Plumb, Arch, Joanna J., Saxbe, Darby E., Lieberman, Matthew D.·2014·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an empirically supported treatment for social phobia. However, not all individuals respond to treatment and many who show improvement do not maintain their gains over the long-term. Thus, alternative treatments are needed. Method: The current study (N = 87) was a 3-arm randomized clinical trial comparing CBT, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and a wait-list control group (WL) in participants with a diagnosis of social phobia based on criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Participants completed 12 sessions of CBT or ACT or a 12-week waiting period. All participants completed assessments at baseline and posttreatment, and participants assigned to CBT and ACT also completed assessments 6 and 12 months following baseline. Assessments consisted of self-report measures, a public-speaking task, and clinician ratings. Results: Multilevel modeling was used to examine between-group differences on outcomes measures. Both treatment groups outperformed WL, with no differences observed between CBT and ACT on self-report, independent clinician, or publicspeaking outcomes. Lower self-reported psychological flexibility at baseline was associated with greater improvement by the 12-month follow-up in CBT compared with ACT. Self-reported fear of negative evaluation significantly moderated outcomes as well, with trends for both extremes to be associated with superior outcomes from CBT and inferior outcomes from ACT. Across treatment groups, higher perceived control and extraversion were associated with greater improvement, whereas comorbid depression was associated with poorer outcomes. Conclusions: Implications for clinical practice and future research are discussed. © 2014 American Psychological Association.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0037212

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

19 of 46 cited sources checked · 13 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    CBT is an empirically supported treatment for social phobia.

    “Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an empirically supported treatment for social phobia.”
    • Also stated in: § Treatments · plain
      “This particular CBT has been effective for individuals with social phobia within larger primary care (Craske et al., 2011) and clinic samples (Arch et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Craske et al., 2011 source
    • cites Arch et al., 2012 source
  • Premisecitation

    In the first randomized controlled trial comparing ACT to CBT in patients diagnosed with anxiety disorders, comparable outcomes were found between CBT and ACT.

    “In the first randomized controlled trial comparing ACT to CBT in patients diagnosed with anxiety disorders (Arch et al., 2012), comparable outcomes were found between CBT and ACT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch et al., 2012 source
  • Premisecitation

    A review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with no-treatment, wait-list, or placebo controls found a comparison-weighted grand mean effect size of Cohen's d = .95 for CBT from pre- to post-treatment.

    “A review of meta-analyses of RCTs involving no-treatment, wait-list or placebo controls reported a comparison-weighted grand mean effect size (Cohen’s d) of .95 from pre- to post- treatment (Butler, Chapman, Forman, & Beck, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Butler, Chapman, Forman, & Beck, 2006 source

      The Summary and conclusions reports a comparison-weighted grand mean effect size of 0.95 for CBT against no-treatment, wait-list, or placebo controls for specified disorders. But Selection of meta-analyses defines a pre-to-post-treatment effect size as an uncontrolled, within-group measure; the reported 0.95 is a between-group comparison, not a pre-to-post effect size. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    In a prior study, significantly more ACT participants continued or began new psychotherapy compared to CBT participants.

    “Similarly, in the prior study, significantly more ACT participants continued or began new psychotherapy compared to CBT participants (Arch et al., 2012),.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch et al., 2012 source
  • Study design and conductcitation

    As in an earlier comparison, the two treatments in the current study were structured to be equated on the amount of exposure to feared situations, albeit presented with different rationales.

    “As was the case in the earlier comparison of ACT and CBT for a mixed anxiety sample (Arch et al., 2012), the two treatments in the current study were structured to be equated on the amount of exposure to feared situations, albeit presented with different rationales (i.e., to gain control over fear responding in CBT and to achieve actions consistent with life values in ACT).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch et al., 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
  • May combine two claims. 65
  • Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Meuret et al. (2010) found that lower perceived control was associated with greater improvement in cognitive therapy for panic disorder.

    “Meuret et al. (2010) found that lower perceived control was associated with greater improvement in cognitive therapy for panic disorder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Meuret et al. (2010) source

      The Results (Effect of Baseline Perceived Control) report no significant association between perceived control and improvement within cognitive therapy (CT). The Discussion likewise says initial control did not predict CT outcome. Patients with low perceived control improved more in CT than in CART, but that is a comparison between treatments, not the claimed association within CT. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a panic disorder sample, lower perceived control was associated with poorer outcomes from a treatment aimed at changing respiration, whereas higher cognitive misappraisal of anxiety symptoms was related to poorer outcomes from cognitive therapy.

    “In a panic disorder sample, Meuret et al. (2010) found that lower perceived control was associated with poorer outcomes from a treatment aimed at changing respiration, whereas higher cognitive misappraisal of anxiety symptoms (i.e., anxiety sensitivity) was related to poorer outcomes from cognitive therapy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Meuret et al. (2010) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The sample in that first ACT-versus-CBT trial was composed of mixed anxiety disorders and was too small to evaluate the relative effects of CBT and ACT for specific anxiety disorders.

    “However, the sample was comprised of mixed anxiety disorders and was too small to evaluate the relative effects of CBT and ACT for specific anxiety disorders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gender was not a predictor of CBT outcomes in prior studies, including for social phobia, and it was neither a predictor nor a moderator of outcome in the previous study of a mixed anxiety disorder sample.

    “Gender was not a predictor of CBT outcomes in prior studies, including for social phobia (Schuurmans et al., 2009; Watanabe et al., 2010), and it was neither a predictor nor a moderator of outcome in the previous study of a mixed anxiety disorder sample (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Schuurmans et al., 2009 source

      The Predictor variables of treatment outcome section (p. 6) lists the factors tested for CBT outcome but does not include gender. Gender appears in Data analysis (p. 7) only as a variable used to impute missing data. Although the sample included people with social phobia (The treatment study, p. 3), our copy does not establish whether gender predicted CBT outcomes for them or for the sample overall. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Watanabe et al., 2010 source
    • cites Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The sample size was relatively small, which may have led to insufficient power to detect differences between two active treatments and failure to replicate all findings from the prior study.

    “Most notably, the sample size was relatively small, which may have led to insufficient power to detect differences between two active treatments, and failure to replicate all findings from our prior study (Arch et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In the current study, ACT and CBT produced similar rates of clinically significant improvement, comparable to published mean response rates for CBT for social phobia: 46% at post-treatment and 52.9% at follow-up.

    “In the current study, ACT and CBT produced similar rates of clinically significant improvement, that were comparable to published mean response rates for CBT for social phobia: 46% at post-treatment (12 studies, 29 data points) and 52.9% at follow-up (3 studies, 10 data points)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2007 source

      The Discussion says the group CBT outcomes were comparable to Western reports, which supports the general comparison. But the Results report this study’s post-treatment response rates as 33.3% (intention-to-treat) and 38.0% (completers); our copy does not report published mean response rates of 46% at post-treatment or 52.9% at follow-up, or the stated study and data-point counts. The paper did not compare ACT with CBT; that comparison appears to be the citing authors’ own result. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Davidson et al., 2004 source
    • cites Olivares et al., 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Very few studies have used reliable change index methods to compute treatment response rates, but the few that have evidence response rates comparable to those in the present study.

    “Very few studies have used reliable change index methods to compute treatment response rates but the few that have (Stangier et al., 2003; Tillfors et al., 2008) evidence response rates comparable to those in the present study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stangier et al., 2003 source
    • cites Tillfors et al., 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    To our knowledge, only one other study examined extraversion as a predictor of behavioral treatment in a social phobia sample, with null results.

    “To our knowledge, only one other study examined extraversion as a predictor of behavioral treatment in a social phobia sample, with null results (Chen et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The current results contrast with the prior report in which moderate levels of anxiety sensitivity led to better outcomes from CBT whereas they did not affect ACT, and with the report by Meuret et al. (2010) where higher levels of anxiety sensitivity led to poorer response to cognitive therapy and greater response to capnometry assisted respiratory training.

    “Thus, the current results contrast with the prior report in which moderate levels of anxiety sensitivity led to better outcomes from CBT whereas they did not affect ACT (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012), and with the report by Meuret et al. (2010) where higher levels of anxiety sensitivity led to poorer response to cognitive therapy and greater response to capnometry assisted respiratory training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012 source
    • cites Meuret et al. (2010) source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The results are generally consistent with a prior study (Arch et al., 2012), where few differences were found between the two treatments for a mixed anxiety disorder sample, excepting greater improvements from post to follow-up on clinical severity ratings for ACT than CBT.

    “The results are generally consistent with a prior study (Arch et al., 2012), where few differences were found in outcomes between the two treatments for a mixed anxiety disorder sample, excepting greater improvements from post to follow-up on clinical severity ratings for ACT than CBT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These data suggest that changes in quality of life may take longer than symptom changes, consistent with prior evidence for changes in quality of life by the 12-month follow-up, albeit more so following CBT than ACT.

    “These data suggest that changes in quality of life may take longer than symptom changes, which is consistent with prior evidence for changes in quality of life by the 12 month follow-up, albeit more so following CBT than ACT (Arch et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch et al., 2012 source
  • Borderline on S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based): unclear from the text.

    Findingnone given

    Treatment credibility ratings did not differ significantly between ACT and CBT.

    “Treatment credibility ratings did not differ significantly between ACT (M=4.83, SD=2.5) and CBT (M=4.2, SD=2.4), t(60)=−1.02, p=.311.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In all treatment conditions, greater perceived control and greater extraversion predicted more improvement.

    “Across treatment groups, higher perceived control, and extraversion were associated with greater improvement”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fear of negative evaluation, measured by self-report, was a significant moderator; both high and low scores tended to predict better results with CBT and worse results with ACT.

    “Self-reported fear of negative evaluation significantly moderated outcomes as well, with trends for both extremes to be associated with superior outcomes from CBT and inferior outcomes from ACT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Having a comorbid depression diagnosis predicted worse outcomes in all treatment conditions.

    “whereas comorbid depression was associated with poorer outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the current trial, both CBT and ACT outperformed waitlist on self-report, independent clinician, and public speaking outcomes; CBT and ACT did not differ.

    “Both treatment groups outperformed WL, with no differences observed between CBT and ACT on self-report, independent clinician, or public speaking outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Time × Group interaction for quality of life was not significant for S1 or S2.

    “The Time × Group interaction for quality of life was not significant for S1 (p=.539) or S2 (p=.427).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perceived control was a significant predictor of fear and avoidance ratings, with higher perceived control associated with lower fear and avoidance.

    “Perceived control was a significant predictor of fear and avoidance ratings (z=2.00 p=.045), with patients higher in perceived control reporting lower fear and avoidance (b=−.73; CI=−.016 to −1.44), collapsed across group and follow-up assessments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither comorbid anxiety nor neuroticism significantly predicted either composite symptoms or fear and avoidance ratings.

    “and neither comorbid anxiety nor neuroticism significantly predicted either outcome (ps>.186).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    S1 change slopes indicated a significant reduction in subjective distress during public speaking in ACT.

    “ACT (p<.001)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At post-treatment, rates of clinically significant improvement were 52.3% for CBT, 40.9% for ACT, and 4.3% for WL.

    “Rates at Post were as follows: CBT=52.3% (n=11/21), ACT=40.9% (n=9/22), and WL=4.3% (n=1/23); χ2 (N=66, df=2)=12.93, p=.001.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Time × Group interaction for fear and avoidance ratings was significant for S1 but not for S2.

    “The Time × Group interaction for fear and avoidance ratings was significant for S1 (p=.003) but not for S2 (p=.366).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    S1 change slopes indicated significant fear and avoidance reduction in ACT.

    “and ACT (p<.001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the intent-to-treat analysis, clinically significant improvement rates at 12-month follow-up were 47.8% for CBT and 33.3% for ACT.

    “and 47.8% and 33.3% for CBT and ACT, respectively, at 12MFU.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Comorbid depression significantly predicted fear and avoidance ratings, with patients with comorbid depression rated as more fearful and avoidant.

    “Comorbid depression significantly predicted fear and avoidance ratings (z=2.28, p=.023), with patients with comorbid depression rated as more fearful and avoidant (b=23.8; CI=3.33 to 44.33).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At 12-month follow-up, clinically significant improvement rates were 40.0% for CBT and 41.2% for ACT.

    “12MFU rates were CBT=40.0% (n=6/15) and ACT=41.2% (n=7/17) (p=.95).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    From post-treatment to 12-month follow-up, 8 participants stopped psychotropic medication (CBT=3, ACT=5) and 3 began medication (CBT=2, ACT=1).

    “From Post to 12MFU, 8 stopped psychotropic medication (CBT=3, ACT=5) and 3 began medication (CBT=2, ACT=1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Time × Group interaction for composite symptoms was significant for S1 but not for S2.

    “The Time × Group interaction for composite symptoms was significant for S1 (p<.001) but not for S2 (p=.318).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither age nor ethnicity was a significant predictor of composite symptoms or fear and avoidance ratings.

    “Neither age nor ethnicity was a significant predictor of either outcome (ps>.230).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two participants completed one session and 14 completed between 2 and 11 sessions.

    “Two completed one session and 14 completed between 2 and 11 sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    One participant dropped from the wait-list condition.

    “One participant dropped from WL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither comorbid depression nor perceived control predicted composite symptoms.

    “Neither comorbid depression nor perceived control predicted composite symptoms (ps=.067)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    CBT and ACT both outperformed WL on clinically significant improvement.

    “CBT and ACT both outperformed WL, χ2 (N=44, df=1)=12.77, p<.001 and χ2 (N=45, df=1)=8.70, p<.01, respectively”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Over the same interval, no participant ended psychotherapy and 4 began new psychotherapy (CBT=0, ACT=4), all between 6- and 12-month follow-up.

    “Over the same interval, no participant ended psychotherapy and 4 began new psychotherapy (CBT=0, ACT=4) (all between 6MFU and 12MFU).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Time × Group interaction for clinical severity ratings was significant for S1 but not for S2.

    “The Time × Group interaction for clinical severity ratings was significant for S1 (p<.001) but not for S2 (p=.629).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Comorbid depression, extroversion, perceived control, comorbid anxiety, and neuroticism did not significantly moderate composite symptoms or fear and avoidance ratings.

    “Comorbid depression, extroversion, perceived control, comorbid anxiety and neuroticism did not significantly moderate composite symptoms or fear and avoidance ratings (ps>.065).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    46 of 62 participants (74%) completed all 12 treatment sessions; completion was 67% in CBT and 83% in ACT.

    “46 of 62 participants (74%) completed all 12-treatment sessions: CBT=67% (22/33), ACT=83% (24/29).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Time × Group interaction for subjective distress during public speaking was not significant for S1 or S2.

    “The Time × Group interaction was not significant for subjective distress during public speaking for S1 (p=.469) or for S2 (p=.051).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Individuals assigned to ACT or CBT did not differ in their rate of attrition or perceived credibility in the treatment.

    “Nor did they differ in their rate of attrition or their perceived credibility in the treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four participants in ACT added a new psychotherapy, and none did so in CBT; none of the four achieved clinically reliable change despite additional therapy.

    “Notably, whereas four participants in ACT added a new psychotherapy (although none achieved clinically reliable change despite additional therapy), none did so in CBT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some participants in ACT received additional treatment during the follow-up period, and the study did not assess what type of treatment or the number of sessions they received.

    “Finally, some participants in ACT received additional treatment during the follow-up period, and we did not assess what type of treatment or the number of sessions they received.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Over and above symptom severity, the SSPS significantly moderated clinician-rated outcome, although interpretation is tempered by lack of significant simple effects.

    “Over and above symptom severity, our measure of fear of negative evaluation, the SSPS, significantly moderated clinician-rated outcome, although interpretation is tempered by lack of significant simple effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Visual inspection revealed inverse curvilinear relationships, with individuals scoring either the highest or the lowest on fears of negative evaluation tending to fare better with CBT and worse with ACT.

    “Visual inspection revealed inverse curvilinear relationships, with individuals scoring either the highest or the lowest on fears of negative evaluation tending to fare better with CBT and worse with ACT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social phobia is one of the most common anxiety disorders, with lifetime prevalence rates of 16.6%.

    “We focused on social phobia to decrease heterogeneity in this first comparison study and because social phobia is one of the most common anxiety disorders, with lifetime prevalence rates of 16.6% (Kessler, Chiu, Demler, Merikangas, & Walters, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kessler, Chiu, Demler, Merikangas, & Walters, 2005 source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premiseown data

    In that mixed anxiety disorder sample, there were trends for CBT to outperform ACT at higher levels of experiential avoidance, and ACT outperformed CBT among those with a comorbid mood disorder, with trends to outperform CBT at lower levels of experiential avoidance.

    “Also, there were trends for CBT to outperform ACT at higher levels of experiential avoidance. ACT outperformed CBT among those with a comorbid mood disorder, and there were trends to outperform CBT at lower levels of experiential avoidance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wolitzky-Taylor, Arch, Rosenfield, & Craske, 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ACT cultivates mindfulness, acceptance, and cognitive defusion to increase psychological flexibility and promote behavior change consistent with personal values.

    “ACT cultivates mindfulness, acceptance, and cognitive defusion (flexible distancing from the literal meaning of cognitions) to increase psychological flexibility and promote behavior change consistent with personal values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Instructions for emotional acceptance lower distress and increase tolerance for experimentally induced anxiety symptoms.

    “Instructions for emotional acceptance have been shown to lower distress and increase tolerance for experimentally-induced symptoms of anxiety (Campbell-Sills, Barlow, Brown, & Hofmann, 2006; Levitt, Brown, Orsillo, & Barlow, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Campbell-Sills, Barlow, Brown, & Hofmann, 2006 source
    • cites Levitt, Brown, Orsillo, & Barlow, 2004 source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premiseown data

    Neuroticism was a predictor of poorer outcomes regardless of treatment condition in the mixed anxiety disorder sample.

    “Also, neuroticism was a predictor of poorer outcomes, regardless of treatment condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wolitzky-Taylor, Arch, Rosenfield, & Craske, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The treatment credibility questionnaire had a Cronbach's alpha of .95.

    “Prior to the second therapy session, after treatment rationales, participants completed a 6-item treatment credibility questionnaire adapted from Borkovec and Nau (1972) (α=.95).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    There were trends for superior outcomes from CBT and inferior outcomes from ACT at the extreme ends of fear of negative evaluation.

    “there were trends for superior outcomes from CBT and inferior outcomes from ACT at the extreme ends of fear of negative evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The modified intent-to-treat analysis omitted 10 people who dropped out before starting treatment and before learning their randomization; these dropouts were comparable to non-attriters on sociodemographic variables, clinical severity, and treatment assignment.

    “We used a modified intent-to-treat approach in that we did not analyze 10 of the original 100 participants who dropped prior to treatment initiation before they were aware of their randomization to ACT or CBT: they did not differ from non-attriters on sociodemographic variables (ps>.12), clinical severity ratings (p=.85), or assignment to ACT (n=4) vs. CBT (n=5) vs. WL (n=1; p=.48).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Moderator analyses were restricted to composite symptoms and fear and avoidance outcomes; clinical severity ratings were excluded because of limited range, and public-speaking anxiety was excluded because of non-normal distribution.

    “Moderator analyses were limited to composite symptoms and fear and avoidance outcomes; CSR was excluded due to limited range in the data, and anxiety during public speaking was excluded due to a non-normal distribution that produced inaccurate parameter estimates in the model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The self-report social anxiety measures (LSAS-SR, SIAS, SPS) had high internal consistency in this sample, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from .90 to .97.

    “In the current sample, Cronbach’s αs=.97 (Pre) and .94 (Post).”
    • Also stated in: § Outcome Measures · plain
      “Cronbach’s αs=.96 (Pre) and .95 (Post).”
    • Also stated in: § Outcome Measures · plain
      “In the current sample, αs=.93 (Pre) and .90 (Post).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Self Statements During Public Speaking questionnaire had Cronbach's alphas of .88 at pre-treatment and .90 at post-treatment.

    “Mean ratings for negative thoughts are analyzed in the current sample: αs were .88 (Pre) and .90 (Post).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Moderator analyses used a multilevel model with a repeated-measures ANCOVA-like design, pre-treatment values as a covariate, and Post, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up as repeated measures.

    “Consistent with prior studies of moderators (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012), we chose a MLM, repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)-like design, implemented using the xtmixed command in Stata 12.0. Pre values of the dependent measures were included as a covariate, and Post, 6MFU, and 12MFU were levels of the repeated measures independent variable (Time).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Longitudinal data were analyzed with multilevel modeling, which accounts for nesting of time-points within subjects and includes participants with missing data.

    “Longitudinal data were analyzed with multi-level modeling (MLM) in Stata 12.0 using the xtmixed command. MLM accounts for nesting of time-points within subjects, allowing examination of within and between subject change across Time (Pre, Post, 6MFU, 12MFU) and by group (ACT, CBT and WL). MLM includes participants with missing data and uses all available data to estimate the models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The residuals were normally distributed in every model.

    “Residuals were normally distributed across all models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Quality of Life Inventory had Cronbach's alphas of .85 at pre-treatment and .84 at post-treatment.

    “In the current sample, Cronbach’s αs=.85 (Pre) and .84 (Post).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Therapist competence scores indicated good therapist skills in both CBT and ACT and did not differ significantly between treatments.

    “Therapist competence scores indicated “good” therapist skills in CBT (M=3.06, SD=.67) and ACT (M=3.21, SD=.57) that did not significantly differ, t(42)=−.76, p=.449.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Inter-rater reliability on the principal diagnosis was 100%, and on dimensional CSR ratings for social phobia was ICC = 1.00 (100% agreement).

    “Inter-rater reliability on the principal diagnosis (n=22) was 100%, and on dimensional CSR ratings for social phobia (n=10) was ICC=1.00 (100% agreement).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The two active treatments had the same number of exposure sessions, but the stated purpose of exposure differed between them.

    “ACT and CBT were matched on number of sessions devoted to exposure but differed in framing of the intent of exposure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Models with and without dropout as a predictor produced the same results, which supports a missing-at-random assumption.

    “Results did not differ between models that included dropout as a predictor and those that did not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Individuals without comorbid depression, or who were higher in extraversion or perceived control, fared better than their counterparts with either treatment approach.

    “Also, individuals without comorbid depression or who were higher in extraversion or perceived control fared better than their counterparts with either treatment approach.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Broadly, CBT and ACT did not differ from each other on self-report, independent clinician, or public speaking outcomes, and each was superior to wait-list on the majority of measures.

    “Broadly speaking, the two treatments did not differ from each other in terms of self-report, independent clinician, or public speaking outcomes, with each treatment superior to the wait-list control on the majority of measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The majority of participants completed therapy within 12 to 16 weeks (range 11-18 weeks).

    “The majority completed therapy within 12 to 16 weeks (range 11 – 18 weeks).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Anxiety Control Questionnaire had Cronbach's alphas of .89 at pre-treatment and .90 at post-treatment.

    “Current αs were .89 (Pre) and .90 (Post).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-16 had Cronbach's alphas of .83 at pre-treatment and .88 at post-treatment.

    “Herein, a one-factor scale was used, with higher scores indicating greater psychological flexibility: αs were .83 (Pre) and .88 (Post).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Only participants with Post scores were included in the moderator analysis.

    “Therefore, only participants with Post scores were included in the moderator analysis.10”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were stratified by age and gender across CBT, ACT, and waitlist.

    “Participants were stratified by age and gender in CBT, ACT and WL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Treatment adherence and therapist competence ratings had excellent inter-rater reliability (ICCs .78-.97) and intra-rater reliability (ICCs .98-1.0).

    “Inter-rater reliability on 35 sessions was excellent (ICCs for scales ranged from .78 to .97).”
    • Also stated in: § Treatment Adherence and Therapist competence · plain
      “Intra-rater reliability of the primary rater, which was assessed on 18 sessions, was excellent (ICCs for scales ranged from .98 to 1.0).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Therapists delivering CBT, ACT, or both did not differ in gender, age, or years since starting graduate school (p's > .39).

    “There were no differences among therapists who provided CBT, ACT or both in terms of gender, age or years since entering graduate school (p’s>.39).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire neuroticism and extraversion scales had high internal consistency in this sample, with alphas ranging from .84 to .90.

    “Current αs for neuroticism were .86 (Pre) and .84 (Post) and for extroversion were .90 (Pre) and .85 (Post).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study had a high level of treatment attrition (nearly 50% by 12-month follow-up), which may have reduced power and affected the ability to observe continued change over the follow-up period.

    “Also, we had a high level of treatment attrition (nearly 50% by 12 month follow-up), which may have reduced power and affected our ability to observe continued change over the follow-up period.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Superior CBT outcomes as a function of higher experiential avoidance mirrors trends in the prior study.

    “Superior CBT outcomes as a function of higher experiential avoidance mirrors trends in the prior study (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The role of predictors of exposure-based treatment, whether cognitively based or acceptance based, is in need of further replication.

    “Thus, in all cases, the role of predictors of exposure-based treatment, whether cognitively based or acceptance based, is in need of further replication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    It was previously found that comorbid depression led to greater improvement in ACT and for CBT, depression either led to poorer outcome or had no association with outcome.

    “It was previously found that comorbid depression led to greater improvement in ACT (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012) and for CBT, depression either led to poorer outcome (Chambless, Tran, & Glass, 1997; Steketee, Chambless, & Tran, 2001) or had no association with outcome (Kampman, Keijsers, Hoogduin, & Hendriks, 2008; Schuurmans et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012 source
    • cites Chambless, Tran, & Glass, 1997 source
    • cites Steketee, Chambless, & Tran, 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although involvement in alternative psychotherapy clouds the group comparison, the results indicate that individuals with social phobia will, on average, respond as well to ACT as they do to CBT.

    “Although involvement in alternative psychotherapy clouds the group comparison, the results indicate that individuals with social phobia will, on average, respond as well to ACT as they do to CBT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The lack of differences between CBT and ACT is not due to lack of effectiveness, since the two treatment conditions yielded superior outcomes to a wait-list comparison on most outcomes.

    “The lack of differences between CBT and ACT is not due to lack of effectiveness, since the two treatment conditions yielded superior outcomes to a wait-list comparison on most outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    None of the four ACT participants who received additional treatment achieved reliable change criteria by the 12-month follow-up, suggesting that the findings were unlikely to be influenced by the additional treatment.

    “However, none of these four participants achieved reliable change criteria by the 12-month follow-up, suggesting that the findings were unlikely to be influenced by the additional treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These data suggest that repetition of the public speaking task was alone sufficient to yield significant improvements in anxiety, although improvements did not generalize to other measures of social anxiety severity.

    “These data suggest that repetition of the public speaking task was alone sufficient to yield significant improvements in anxiety, although improvements that did not generalize to other measures of social”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although expert supervision was provided, the findings may have differed with more experienced clinicians.

    “Although this is common to many clinical trials and expert supervision was provided, the findings may have differed with more experienced clinicians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Given the sample size, the study had sufficient power (80%) to detect only large effects for treatment group effects and moderator analyses; power to detect moderate and small effects was 40% and 20%, respectively.

    “Given our sample size, we had sufficient power (80%) to detect only large effects for the treatment group effects (Cohen’s d = .85) and moderator analyses (Cohen’s f2 = .45). Power to detect moderate and small effects for both analyses was 40% and 20%, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In sum, this study adds to the small but growing body of evidence indicating that CBT and ACT perform equally well for the treatment of social phobia, and significantly outperform waitlist controls.

    “In sum, this study adds to the small but growing body of evidence indicating that CBT and ACT perform equally well for the treatment of social phobia, and significantly outperform waitlist controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Treatment was delivered by relatively inexperienced graduate students.

    “Second, treatment was delivered by relatively inexperienced graduate students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although multilevel modeling can produce less biased estimates when data are missing, it is unknown whether lower attrition would have influenced findings for the follow-up time points.

    “Although multi-level modeling can produce less biased estimates when data are missing, we do not know whether lower attrition would have influenced findings for the follow-up time points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Similarities between ACT and CBT are discussed elsewhere, including exposure to rather than suppression of anxious thoughts, active effort to deal with anxious thoughts, and attainment of strategic control over emotions via different paths.

    “Similarities between ACT and CBT are discussed elsewhere (Arch & Craske, 2008). These include exposure to, rather than suppression of, anxious thoughts; active effort to deal with anxious thoughts; and attainment of strategic control over emotions albeit via different paths.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arch & Craske, 2008 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Given the potency of exposure for anxiety disorders, it is conceivable that the shared component of exposure overrode other differences between the two treatments and thereby equated their effects.

    “Given the potency of exposure for anxiety disorders (e.g. Norton & Price, 2007), it is conceivable that the shared component of exposure overrode other differences between the two treatments, and thereby equated their effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Norton & Price, 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This study replicated a moderator finding from a previous comparison of CBT and ACT, showing that individuals with lower psychological flexibility respond more favorably to CBT.

    “This study also replicated a moderator finding from a previous comparison of CBT and ACT, showing that individuals with lower psychological flexibility respond more favorably to CBT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
88 of 88
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Therapist allegiance did not confound the treatment outcome comparisons.

    “We failed to measure therapy allegiance of our therapists, although we presume that allegiance was a less significant factor than might otherwise be the case with highly experienced therapists.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACT is generally as effective as CBT.

    “which, although generally as effective as CBT (Craske et al., 2014)”

    From Neural responses to social threat and predictors of cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy in social anxiety disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Craske et al., 2014

    The Discussion says people with social phobia respond, on average, as well to ACT as to CBT, and describes ACT as a viable alternative. The claim omits the social-phobia context and thus states the comparison more broadly than this study establishes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinically significant response rates following CBT or ACT for social anxiety disorder are around 50-55%, ranging from 43% to 70%.

    “Clinically significant response rates of individual patients following these interventions are around 50–55%, ranging from 43% to 70% (for a review see Loerinc et al., 2015; Craske et al., 2014; Leichsenring et al., 2014; Lincoln et al., 2005).”

    From Public speaking avoidance as a treatment moderator for social anxiety disorder. (2017) · cites this paper as Craske et al., 2014

    The Results (Clinically Significant Improvement; page not supplied) report 52.3% for CBT and 40.9% for ACT at post-treatment, with rates varying at follow-up. The Discussion describes clinically significant improvement rates of 40%–57%. Thus, rates around 50%–55% occur in this study, but its reported rates do not substantiate the stated 43%–70% range. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In that social anxiety RCT, the same association was true for fear of negative evaluations.

    “the same was true of fear of negative evaluations.”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a Treatment for Anxiety and Depression (2017) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results (Theoretically relevant; page not provided) report that fear of negative evaluation significantly moderated clinician-rated fear and avoidance outcomes in the CBT–ACT comparison. But no treatment-group difference was significant in the simple-effects tests, and it did not moderate self-reported composite symptoms. The Discussion therefore describes the pattern as a trend to be interpreted cautiously, rather than an unqualified association. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both CBT and ACT involved twelve weekly one-hour, manualized, individual therapy sessions.

    “Both CBT and ACT treatments involved twelve weekly one-hour, manualized, individual therapy sessions (for details see Craske et al., 2014).”
  • Although emerging evidence suggests ACT is as effective as CBT for anxiety disorders, including in this sample, ACT is relatively newer and is supported by less evidence than CBT with respect to outcomes and mediators.

    “Although emerging evidence suggests that ACT is as effective as CBT for anxiety disorders (Craske et al., 2014), including in this sample, ACT is relatively newer and is supported by less evidence than CBT with respect to outcomes and mediators.”

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(60) = -1.02reported p = .311 · recomputed p = .312

    “t(60)=−1.02, p = .311”

  • Consistentt(42) = -0.76reported p = .449 · recomputed p = .451

    “t(42)=−.76, p = .449”

  • Consistentt(42) = 7.87reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(42)=7.87, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(42) = -20.19reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(42)=−20.19, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(42) = 5.68reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(42)=5.68, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(42) = -4.56reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(42)=−4.56, p < .001”

  • Consistentz = 2.01reported p = .044 · recomputed p = .044

    “(z=2.01, p = .044”

  • Consistentz = 2.28reported p = .023 · recomputed p = .023

    “(z=2.28, p = .023”

  • Consistentz = 1.96reported p = .05 · recomputed p = .050

    “(z=1.96, p = .05”

9 of 9

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • CBT-waitlist confidence interval conflicts with the reported effect

    Major

    The reported 95% confidence interval is centered at 0.845, not the stated effect of 2.13. It also includes zero despite the reported p<.001 for this comparison.

    Reported 2.13 · recomputed 0.845

  • The described follow-up decrease includes an increase for CBT

    Minor

    The paper says the percentages dropped with last-observation-carried-forward analysis, but its CBT rate at 12 months rises from 40.0% to 47.8%.

  • Extraversion interval is not centered on its estimate

    Minor

    The reported interval has a midpoint of −2.725, rather than the stated coefficient of −0.272.

    Reported -0.272 · recomputed -2.725

  • CBT-ACT severity interval excludes its stated estimate

    Minor

    The stated interval has a midpoint of −0.615 and does not contain the reported effect of 0.61. At least one of the estimate or interval limits is incorrect.

    Reported 0.61 · recomputed -0.615

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craske, M. G., Niles, A. N., Burklund, L. J., Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Vilardaga, J. C. P., Arch, J. J., Saxbe, D. E., & Lieberman, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2014-12
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
1034-1048
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2104639541
Cited by
206
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
28.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institutes of Mental Health (1 R21 MH081299)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological flexibility, fear of negative evaluation, treatment moderators, public speaking, comorbid depression, extraversion, perceived control, maintenance of treatment effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Educational Status, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Phobic Disorders, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Speech, Waiting Lists, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Marital Status, Self Report, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review