Cited by 92Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Therapist Barriers to the Dissemination of Exposure Therapy

Deacon, Brett J., Farrell, Nicholas R.·2013·Handbook of Treating Variants and Complications in Anxiety Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-6458-7_23

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deacon, B. J., & Farrell, N. R.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
Deacon, Brett J.
Venue
Handbook of Treating Variants and Complications in Anxiety Disorders
Published
2013
Pages
363-373
OpenAlex
W2165130631
Cited by
91
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
18.20
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
exposure therapy, dissemination, cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, clinical implementation, psychotherapy training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review