Cited by 22Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Pilot of an acceptance and commitment therapy and schema group intervention for mental health carer's interpersonal problems

Quinlan, Elly, Deane, Frank P., Crowe, Trevor·2018·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.06.006

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinlan, E., Deane, F. P., & Crowe, T.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Quinlan, Elly
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
9
Pages
53-62
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809665446
Cited by
22
References
89
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
interpersonal problems, acceptance and commitment therapy, schema therapy, group intervention, experiential avoidance, mindfulness, well-being, acceptability, pilot study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review