Cited by 155Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Acceptance: An Historical and Conceptual Review

Williams, John C., Lynn, Steven Jay·2010·Imagination, Cognition and Personality

Abstract

Recognition of the value of acceptance of the self, others, and the flux of human experience, has philosophical and religious roots that date back thousands of years. The past two decades have witnessed a swell of interest in acceptance, as evidenced by an increase in acceptance-based therapeutic interventions, and a growing appreciation of the paradoxical nature of acceptance and personal change and the role of experiential avoidance in psychopathology. In this article we review historical and contemporary descriptions and definitions of acceptance, measures of acceptance, the relation between acceptance and change, and the role of acceptance in psychopathology and psychotherapy. Our central objective is to delineate a rich conceptual scheme that encompasses the diverse ways in which acceptance has been explicated in classical and contemporary writings, and to highlight the need for further validation of this useful and popular construct.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/ic.30.1.c

Cites

361 of 361 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-judging is often considered a crucial facet of acceptance.

    “It is therefore unsurprising that many conceptualizations of acceptance are centrally focused on the role of evaluations, and non-judging (also called non-evaluation) is often considered a crucial facet of acceptance (Shallcross et al., 2010; Williams and Lynn, 2010).”

    From Aspects of acceptance: building a shared conceptual understanding (2024) · cites this paper as Williams and Lynn, 2010

  • Some disagreement exists as to whether allowing entails a neutral orientation to any given experience or a positive and welcoming orientation.

    “Yet some disagreement exists as to whether allowing entails a neutral orientation to any given experience or a positive and welcoming orientation (Williams and Lynn, 2010).”

    From Aspects of acceptance: building a shared conceptual understanding (2024) · cites this paper as Williams and Lynn, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J. C., & Lynn, S. J.
Affiliations
  • VA Long Beach Healthcare System (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, John C.
Venue
Imagination, Cognition and Personality
Published
2010-09
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
5-56
ISSN
  • 0276-2366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4477
OpenAlex
W2098273590
Cited by
155
References
354
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Imagination Cognition and Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
acceptance, acceptance-based therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, experiential avoidance, psychopathology, personal transformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review