Cited by 18Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Validation of the Hungarian version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II)

Eisenbeck, Nikolett, Szabó-Bartha, Anett·2018·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.07.007

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenbeck, N., & Szabó-Bartha, A.
Affiliations
Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary (HU)
Corresponding author
Eisenbeck, Nikolett
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
9
Pages
80-87
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883086822
Cited by
18
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, psychological inflexibility, psychological flexibility, Hungarian translation, cross-cultural validation, psychometric properties, factor structure, measurement invariance, transdiagnostic mechanisms, treatment history, coping styles, psychological well-being, life satisfaction, depression, anxiety, stress, psychological distress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review