Cited by 71Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Experiential avoidance as a common psychological process in European cultures

Open access
Monestès, Jean-Louis, Karekla, Maria, Jacobs, Nele, Michaelides, Michalis P., Hooper, Nic, Kleen, Marco, Ruiz, Francisco J., Miselli, Giovanni +6 more·2018·European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Abstract. Experiential avoidance, the tendency to rigidly escape or avoid private psychological experiences, represents one of the most prominent transdiagnostic psychological processes with a known role in a wide variety of psychological disorders and practical contexts. Experiential avoidance is argued to be based on a fundamental verbal/cognitive process: an overextension of verbal problem solving into the world within. Although cultures apparently differ in their patterns of emotional expression, to the extent that experiential avoidance is based on a fundamental verbal/cognitive process, measures of this process should be comparable across countries, with similar relationships to health outcomes regardless of the language community. This research tests this view in European countries. The psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, a measure of experiential avoidance, are compared across six languages and seven European countries, for a total of 2,170 nonclinical participants. Multiple group analysis showed that the instrument can be considered invariant across the language samples. The questionnaire constitutes a unidimensional instrument with similar relationships to psychopathology, and has good and very similar psychometric properties in each assessed country. Experiential avoidance reveals not just as transdiagnostic, but also as a transcultural process independent of a specific language community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1015-5759/a000327

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological inflexibility is considered not only as a transdiagnostic process but also as a transcultural process independent of a specific language community.

    “Psychological inflexibility is considered not only as a transdiagnostic process but also as a transcultural process independent of a specific language community (Monestès et al., 2016).”

    From Exploring the impact of carer stressors and psychological inflexibility on depression and anxiety in family carers of people with dementia (2020) · cites this paper as Monestès et al., 2016

    The Discussion (page not available) describes experiential avoidance as a transdiagnostic factor and reports similar AAQ-II properties across six languages in seven European countries. It does not establish that psychological inflexibility as a whole is independent of language community; it calls for further study of non-European samples. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Luciano, M. C., & Hayes, S. C. (2001). Experiential avoidance disorder. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology , 1 , 109-157.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monestès, J.-L., Karekla, M., Jacobs, N., Michaelides, M. P., Hooper, N., Kleen, M., Ruiz, F. J., Miselli, G., Presti, G., Luciano, C., Villatte, M., Bond, F. W., Kishita, N., & Hayes, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • Hasselt University (BE)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • GGZ Drenthe (NL)
  • Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz (CO)
  • Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona (IT)
  • Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
  • University of Almería (ES)
  • Evidence Based Practice Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Venue
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2018-07
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
247-257
ISSN
  • 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2426
OpenAlex
W2301306286
Cited by
71
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
experiential avoidance, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, cross-cultural psychology, cross-cultural invariance, transdiagnostic mechanisms, psychometric properties, European languages, psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review