Cited by 10Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Norwegian Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (NAAQ): A psychometric evaluation.

Open access
Østergaard, Tom, Lundgren, Tobias, Zettle, Robert D., Landrø, Nils Inge, Haaland, Vegard Øksendal·2020·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.12.002

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Østergaard, T., Lundgren, T., Zettle, R. D., Landrø, N. I., & Haaland, V. Ø.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Wichita State University (US)
Corresponding author
Østergaard, Tom
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
15
Pages
103-109
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995785003
Cited by
10
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-07-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (2015056)
  • Research Council of Norway (229135)
  • South East Norway Health Authority Research Funding (2015052)
  • University of Oslo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, psychological flexibility, Norwegian translation, psychometric properties, major depressive disorder, residual depressive symptoms, quality of life, anxiety, incremental validity, clinical samples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review