Cited by 11Sleep and related disordersMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Predicting sleep quality and insomnia severity using the components of the acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) model: A new perspective

Zakiei, Ali, Korani, Dariuosh, Sahraei, Zeinab, Rostampour, Masoumeh, Khazaie, Habibolah·2022·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.10.006

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among psychological inflexibility processes, only experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, acceptance and value-based actions were found to predict insomnia severity.

    “with insomnia severity (Paulos-Guarnieri et al., 2023), only experiential avoidance (McCracken et al., 2021; Zakiei et al., 2022), cognitive fusion (McCracken et al., 2022; McCracken et al., 2023), acceptance (Daly-Eichenhardt et al., 2016; Zakiei et al., 2022) and value-based actions (McCracken et al., 2021) were found to predict insomnia severity.”

    From Psychological inflexibility as a predictor associated with insomnia (2024) · cites this paper as Zakiei et al., 2022

  • Psychological inflexibility may be a transdiagnostic factor underlying sleep problems.

    “may be a transdiagnostic factor underlying sleep problems (Kato, 2016; McCracken et al., 2011; Zakiei et al., 2022)”
  • In Zakiei et al. (2022), all PI measures were associated with both sleep measures (ISI and PSQI).

    “All PI measures were associated with both sleep measures”
  • In Zakiei et al. (2022), experiential avoidance was the strongest predictor for both sleep outcomes.

    “regression‐based analysis found that experiential avoidance was the strongest predictor for both outcomes.”
  • In Zakiei et al. (2022), values and limited perspective taking were not significant in the models.

    “Present moment awareness, cognitive fusion and inaction were also significant in these models, but values and limited perspective taking were not.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zakiei, A., Korani, D., Sahraei, Z., Rostampour, M., & Khazaie, H.
Affiliations
  • Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah (IR)
Corresponding author
Khazaie, Habibolah
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
26
Pages
227-233
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307240052
Cited by
11
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (990304)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, sleep quality, insomnia severity, experiential avoidance, acceptance, earthquake survivors, post-traumatic stress, sleep disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review