Cited by 10Sleep and related disordersMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Associations Between Six Core Processes of Psychological Flexibility with Poor Sleep Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zakiei, Ali, Khazaie, Habibolah, Rostampour, Masoumeh, Moradi, Mohammad-Taher, Rezaie, Leeba, Komasi, Saeid, Rafihi-Ferreira, Renatha El·2024·Current Sleep Medicine Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40675-024-00293-w

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of present moment awareness shows associations with poor sleep quality or insomnia.

    “A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis (Zakiei et al., 2024) found that experiential avoidance, lack of present moment awareness, cognitive fusion and inaction show associations with poor sleep quality or insomnia.”
  • In the Zakiei et al. (2024) meta-analysis, cognitive fusion was inferred using a range of measures associated with this construct.

    “Rather, in the Zakiei et al. (2024) meta‐analysis, cognitive fusion was inferred using a range of measures associated with this construct, including dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, cognitive pre‐sleep arousal, rumination, stress recovery processes, repetitive negative thinking and metacognitive beliefs about repetitive thoughts.”
  • Inaction shows associations with poor sleep quality or insomnia.

    “A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis (Zakiei et al., 2024) found that experiential avoidance, lack of present moment awareness, cognitive fusion and inaction show associations with poor sleep quality or insomnia.”
  • Cognitive fusion shows associations with poor sleep quality or insomnia.

    “A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis (Zakiei et al., 2024) found that experiential avoidance, lack of present moment awareness, cognitive fusion and inaction show associations with poor sleep quality or insomnia.”
  • Experiential avoidance shows associations with poor sleep quality or insomnia.

    “A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis (Zakiei et al., 2024) found that experiential avoidance, lack of present moment awareness, cognitive fusion and inaction show associations with poor sleep quality or insomnia.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zakiei, A., Khazaie, H., Rostampour, M., Moradi, M.-T., Rezaie, L., Komasi, S., & Rafihi-Ferreira, R. E.
Affiliations
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Komasi, Saeid
Venue
Current Sleep Medicine Reports
Published
2024-03-22
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
257-275
ISSN
2198-6401 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393093134
Cited by
10
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Sleep Medicine Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
psychological flexibility, acceptance and commitment therapy, acceptance, cognitive defusion, mindfulness, committed action, self-as-context, values, insomnia severity, poor sleep quality, sleep disorders, age effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review