Cited by 15Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of personalized psychological flexibility index (C-PPFI) in college students

Fang, Shuanghu, Huang, Mingjie, Wang, Yiyi·2023·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.03.008

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, S., Huang, M., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Anhui Normal University (CN)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Fang, Shuanghu
  • Wang, Yiyi
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
28
Pages
23-32
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323353798
Cited by
15
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychological flexibility, acceptance and commitment therapy, Chinese version, psychometric validation, university students, measurement invariance, gender differences, factor structure, discriminant validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review