Cited by 25Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyIndian and Buddhist Studies

Tracing the Path Toward Mindfulness Back to Its Origins: Linking Tenets of Buddhism to Mindfulness Within the Buddhism-Informed Unified Flexibility and Mindfulness (BI-UFM) Model

Rogge, Ronald D., Lin, Yi-Ying, Swanson, Dena Phillips, Amaro, Ajahn·2024·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-022-01886-8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogge, R. D., Lin, Y.-Y., Swanson, D. P., & Amaro, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • College of Saint Rose (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Corresponding author
Rogge, Ronald D.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2022-05-04
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
775-794
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W4225426203
Cited by
25
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
Keywords
Buddhism, Buddhist psychology, decentering, meditation practice, transience, distraction, psychological flexibility, well-being, cross-cultural comparison, East Asian Buddhism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review