Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Labor market discrimination in Delhi: Evidence from a field experiment

Open access
Banerjee, Abhijit, Bertrand, Marianne, Datta, Saugato, Mullainathan, Sendhil·2009·Journal of Comparative Economics

Abstract

We study the role of caste and religion in India's new economy sectors--software and call-centers--by sending 3160 fictitious resumes in response to 371 job openings in and around Delhi (India) that were advertised in major city papers and online job sites. We randomly allocate caste-linked surnames across resumes in order to isolate the effect of caste on applicants' job-search outcomes. We find no evidence of discrimination against non-upper-caste (i.e. Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, and Other Backward Caste) applicants for software jobs. We do find large and significant differences between callback rates for upper-castes and Other Backward Castes (and to a lesser extent Scheduled Castes) in the case of call-center jobs. There is no evidence of discrimination against Muslims for either of the two kinds of jobs we apply for. Overall, the evidence suggests that applicants' caste identities do not significantly affect the callback decisions of firms. Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (1) (2009) 14-27.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ahsan, Ahmed, Pages, Carmen, 2008. Are all labor regulations equal? Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Mimeo · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1294538
  2. Altonji, 1999, Race and gender in the labor market, vol. 3
  3. Amin, 2009, Labor regulation and employment in India's retail stores, Journal of Comparative Economics, 37, 47, 10.1016/j.jce.2008.07.001 · DOI
  4. Bertrand, 2004, Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal, American Economic Review, 94, 991, 10.1257/0002828042002561 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Besley, 2004, Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 10.1162/003355304772839533 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Botero, 2004, The regulation of labor, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 10.1162/0033553042476215 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Goldin, 2000, Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of blind auditions on female Musicians, American Economic Review, 90, 715, 10.1257/aer.90.4.715 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Krishna, 2006, What does it take to become a software professional?, Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 3307
  9. Sachar, Rajinder (Ed.), 2006. Report of the Prime Minister's High-level Committee on the Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India. New Delhi
  10. Srinivas, 1957, Caste in modern India, The Journal of Asian Studies, 16, 529, 10.2307/2941637 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Banerjee, A., Bertrand, M., Datta, S., & Mullainathan, S.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
14-27
ISSN
0147-5967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977459440
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Labor market discrimination in Delhi: Evidence from a field experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.002
The paper
Banerjee, A., Bertrand, M., Datta, S., & Mullainathan, S. (2009). Labor market discrimination in Delhi: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Comparative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.