Cited by 228Accounting and Organizational ManagementQuality and Supply ManagementCorporate Governance and Management

Metrics: You are what you measure!

Hauser, John, Katz, Gerald·1998·European Management Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0263-2373(98)00029-2

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hauser, J., & Katz, G.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
European Management Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
517-528
ISSN
0263-2373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046321047
Cited by
228
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
Keywords
performance indicators, metric selection, metric design, management decision-making, lean metrics, customer understanding, employee understanding, work processes, organizational performance evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review