Cited by 129Bioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentSustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Industrial Ecology

Forest sector circular economy development in Finland: a regional study on sustainability driven competitive advantage and an assessment of the potential for cascading recovered solid wood

Husgafvel, R., Linkosalmi, L., Hughes, M., Kanerva, J., Dahl, O.·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.176

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The need to incentivize design for wood recirculation is highlighted by the literature.

    “The need to incentivize design 519 for wood recirculation is highlighted by the literature (Husgafvel et al., 2018).”
  • The material use of wood is more complex than energy use.

    “In particular, it is important to mention the greater complexity of the material use of wood over energy use (Husgafvel et al., 2018).”
  • The prioritization of the energy conversion of wood is addressed by several scholars, who highlight the existence of incentives to energy production as one of the key factors currently limiting the potential of cascading.

    “The prioritization of the energy conversion of wood is addressed by several scholars, who highlight the existence of incentives to energy production as one of the key factors that are currently limiting the potential of cascading (Bergeron, 2014;Garcia and Hora, 2017;Husgafvel et al., 2018;Keegan et al., 2013;Sikkema et al., 2013).”
  • Husgafvel et al. (2018) indicate that incentives for companies using wood products with small dimensions could help overcome the profitability barriers that currently hinder the development of this particular market segment.

    “Husgafvel et al. (2018) indicate that incentives for companies using wood products with small dimensions could help overcome the profitability barriers that currently hinder the development of this particular market segment.”
  • An additional limiting factor is that policies dealing with energy and waste are independent from one another.

    “An additional limiting factor is that policies dealing with energy and waste are independent from one another (Bergeron, 2014;Husgafvel et al., 2018;Keegan et al., 2013;Suominen et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Husgafvel, R., Linkosalmi, L., Hughes, M., Kanerva, J., & Dahl, O.
Affiliations
Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Husgafvel, R.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
181
Pages
483-497
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2779618976
Cited by
128
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
FWCI
19.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Keywords
circular economy, forest industry, wood reuse, furniture reuse, wood packaging, wood products, bioeconomy, life cycle thinking, end-of-life scenarios, EU circular economy policy, industrial restructuring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review