Cited by 41Algal biology and biofuel productionEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityPhotovoltaic Systems and Sustainability

Carbon and nutrient recovery in the cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris: a life cycle assessment approach to comparing environmental performance

D'Imporzano, Giuliana, Veronesi, Davide, Salati, Silvia, Adani, Fabrizio·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.174

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Imporzano, G., Veronesi, D., Salati, S., & Adani, F.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
194
Pages
685-694
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803919233
Cited by
41
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondazione Cariplo (2014-0587)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Keywords
Chlorella vulgaris, microalgae cultivation, mixotrophic cultivation, autotrophic cultivation, life cycle assessment, environmental impact, whey, dairy wastewater, digestate, CO2 emissions, nutrient recovery, eutrophication, ecotoxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review