Cited by 137Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Maximum Photosynthetic Yield of Green Microalgae in Photobioreactors

Open access
Zijffers, Jan-Willem F., Schippers, Klaske J., Zheng, Ke, Janssen, Marcel, Tramper, Johannes, Wijffels, René H.·2010·Marine Biotechnology

Abstract

The biomass yield on light energy of Dunaliella tertiolecta and Chlorella sorokiniana was investigated in a 1.25- and 2.15-cm light path panel photobioreactor at constant ingoing photon flux density (930 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹). At the optimal combination of biomass density and dilution rate, equal biomass yields on light energy were observed for both light paths for both microalgae. The observed biomass yield on light energy appeared to be based on a constant intrinsic biomass yield and a constant maintenance energy requirement per gram biomass. Using the model of Pirt (New Phytol 102:3-37, 1986), a biomass yield on light energy of 0.78 and 0.75 g mol photons⁻¹ and a maintenance requirement of 0.0133 and 0.0068 mol photons g⁻¹ h⁻¹ were found for D. tertiolecta and C. sorokiniana, respectively. The observed yield decreases steeply at low light supply rates, and according to this model, this is related to the increase of the amount of useable light energy diverted to biomass maintenance. With this study, we demonstrated that the observed biomass yield on light in short light path bioreactors at high biomass densities decreases because maintenance requirements are relatively high at these conditions. All our experimental data for the two strains tested could be described by the physiological models of Pirt (New Phytol 102:3-37, 1986). Consequently, for the design of a photobioreactor, we should maintain a relatively high specific light supply rate. A process with high biomass densities and high yields at high light intensities can only be obtained in short light path photobioreactors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10126-010-9258-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sun-illuminated photobioreactors are sensitive to sunlight conditions during various seasons of the year, which can increase or decrease the temperature of the cultivation medium and thus directly influence biomass yield.

    “Sun illuminated PBR are sensitive to sun light condition during various seasons of the year, which can increase/decrease the temperature of the cultivation medium a thus have direct influence to biomass yield (Zijffers, 2010).”

    From Control system architecture for novel experimental microalgae photobioreactor Simbios (2022) · cites this paper as Zijffers, 2010

    The Materials and Methods (Reactor Set-up and Control; Illumination, pages unavailable) describe fluorescent-tube illumination and reactor temperatures held constant by a controller. The Results and Discussion (Biomass Yield on Light Energy, page unavailable) address light supply and biomass yield, but do not address seasonal sunlight changing cultivation-medium temperature or its effect on yield; searches for season, sunlight and temperature found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CO2 capture in microalgae mass on photosynthesis occurs at a rate of 1 kg of CO2 to 0.48 kg of microalgae.

    “CO2 capture in microalgae mass on photosynthesis at rate 1kg of CO2 to 0.48 kg of microalgae see (Zijffers, 2010).”

    From Control system architecture for novel experimental microalgae photobioreactor Simbios (2022) · cites this paper as Zijffers, 2010

    Materials and Methods (Reactor Set-up and Control; page unavailable) says carbon dioxide was added to control pH. Results and Discussion reports biomass yield per mole of photons, not per kilogram of CO2. Searches for CO2 capture, carbon-to-biomass conversion, and 0.48 found no passage supporting the stated ratio. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Barbosa MJ Hadiyanto S Wijffels RH Overcoming shear stress of microalgae cultures in sparged photobioreactors Biotechnol Bioeng 2004 85 78 85 10.1002/bit.10862 14705014 · DOI
  2. Barbosa MJ Zijffers JW Nisworo A Vaes W Van Schoonhoven J Wijffels RH Optimization of biomass, vitamins, and carotenoid yield on light energy in a flat-panel reactor using the A-stat technique Biotechnol Bioeng 2005 89 233 242 10.1002/bit.20346 15593095 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chisti Y Biodiesel from microalgae Biotechnol Adv 2007 25 294 306 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001 17350212 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cuaresma M Janssen M Vilchez C Wijffels RH Productivity of Chlorella sorokiniana in a short light-path (SLP) panel photobioreactor under high irradiance Biotechnol Bioeng 2009 104 352 359 10.1002/bit.22394 19517522 · DOI
  5. Degen J Uebele A Retze A Schmid-Staiger U Trosch W A novel airlift photobioreactor with baffles for improved light utilization through the flashing light effect J Biotechnol 2001 92 89 94 10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00350-9 11640980 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Duboc P Marison I Von Stockar U Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry 1999 Amsterdam Elsevier
  7. Gordon JM Tailoring optical systems to optimized photobioreactors Int J Hydrogen Energy 2002 27 1175 1184 10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00113-1 · DOI
  8. Ho TY Quigg A Finkel ZV Milligan AJ Wyman K Falkowski PG Morel FMM The elemental composition of some marine phytoplankton J Phycol 2003 39 1145 1159 10.1111/j.0022-3646.2003.03-090.x · DOI
  9. Hoekema S Douma RD Janssen M Tramper J Wijffels RH Controlling light-use by Rhodobacter capsulatus continuous cultures in a flat-panel photobioreactor Biotechnol Bioeng 2006 95 613 626 10.1002/bit.20907 16958141 · DOI
  10. Horton P Ruban A Molecular design of the photosystem II light-harvesting antenna: photosynthesis and photoprotection J Exp Bot 2005 56 365 373 10.1093/jxb/eri023 15557295 · DOI
  11. Hu Q Richmond A Productivity and photosynthetic efficiency of Spirulina platensis as affected by light intensity, algal density and rate of mixing in a flat plate photobioreactor J Appl Phycol 1996 8 139 145 10.1007/BF02186317 · DOI
  12. Hu Q Guterman H Richmond A A flat inclined modular photobioreactor for outdoor mass cultivation of photoautotrophs Biotechnol Bioeng 1996 51 51 60 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960705)51:1<51::AID-BIT6>3.0.CO;2-# 18627087 · DOI
  13. Hu Q Faiman D Richmond A Optimal tilt angles of enclosed reactors for growing photoautotrophic microorganisms outdoors J Ferment Bioeng 1998 85 230 236 10.1016/S0922-338X(97)86773-6 · DOI
  14. Hu Q Zarmi Y Richmond A Combined effects of light intensity, light-path and culture density on output rate of Spirulina platensis (Cyanobacteria) Eur J Phycol 1998 33 165 171 10.1080/09670269810001736663 · DOI
  15. Hu Q Kurano N Kawachi M Iwasaki I Miyachi S Ultrahigh-cell-density culture of a marine green alga Chlorococcum littorale in a flat-plate photobioreactor Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1998 49 655 662 10.1007/s002530051228 · DOI
  16. Mandalam RK Palsson BO Elemental balancing of biomass and medium composition enhances growth capacity in high-density Chlorella vulgaris cultures Biotechnol Bioeng 1998 59 605 611 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980905)59:5<605::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-8 10099378 · DOI
  17. Meiser A Schmid-Staiger U Trosch W Optimization of eicosapentaenoic acid production by Phaeodactylum tricornutum in the flat panel airlift (FPA) reactor J Appl Phycol 2004 16 215 225 10.1023/B:JAPH.0000048507.95878.b5 · DOI
  18. Muller P Li XP Niyogi KK Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy Plant Physiol 2001 125 1558 1566 10.1104/pp.125.4.1558 11299337 PMC1539381 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Paalme T Kahru A Elken R Vanatalu K Tiisma K Vilu R The computer-controlled continuous culture of Escherichia coli with smooth change of dilution rate (A-stat) J Microbiol Methods 1995 24 145 153 10.1016/0167-7012(95)00064-X · DOI
  20. Pirt SJ Tansley review No-4—the thermodynamic efficiency (quantum demand) and dynamics of photosynthetic growth New Phytol 1986 102 3 37 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00794.x 33873885 · DOI
  21. Richmond A Cheng-Wu Z Optimization of a flat plate glass reactor for mass production of Nannochloropsis sp outdoors J Biotechnol 2001 85 259 269 10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00353-9 11173093 · DOI
  22. Richmond A Zhang CW Zarmi Y Efficient use of strong light for high photosynthetic productivity: interrelationships between the optical path, the optimal population density and cell-growth inhibition Biomol Eng 2003 20 229 236 10.1016/S1389-0344(03)00060-1 12919802 · DOI
  23. Tredici MR Zittelli GC Efficiency of sunlight utilization: tubular versus flat photobioreactors Biotechnol Bioeng 1998 57 187 197 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980120)57:2<187::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-J 10099193 · DOI
  24. Van Bodegom P Microbial maintenance: a critical review on its quantification Microb Ecol 2007 53 513 523 10.1007/s00248-006-9049-5 17333428 PMC1915598 · DOI
  25. Wijffels RH Potential of sponges and microalgae for marine biotechnology Trends Biotechnol 2008 26 26 31 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.10.002 18037175 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Zhu CJ Lee YK Determination of biomass dry weight of marine microalgae J Appl Phycol 1997 9 189 194 10.1023/A:1007914806640 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Zijffers JWF Janssen M Tramper J Wijffels RH Design process of an area-efficient photobioreactor Mar Biotechnol 2008 10 404 415 10.1007/s10126-007-9077-2 18266033 PMC2440935 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zijffers, J.-W. F., Schippers, K. J., Zheng, K., Janssen, M., Tramper, J., & Wijffels, R. H.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Wijffels, René H.
Venue
Marine Biotechnology
Published
2010-02-23
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
708-718
ISSN
  • 1436-2228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-2236
OpenAlex
W2030776668
Cited by
137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Marine Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
Dunaliella tertiolecta, Chlorella sorokiniana, microalgae, photobioreactors, light path, maintenance energy, dilution rate, biomass density, photon flux density
MeSH terms
Absorption, Chlorophyta, Chlorella, Photosynthesis, Microalgae, Photobioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review