CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of factors influencing residents' waste sorting behavior: A case study of Shanghai

Govindan, Kannan, Zhuang, Yue, Chen, Gang·2022·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131126
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131126

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. Aguilar-Luzón, 2012, Comparative study between the theory of planned behavior and the value–belief–norm model regarding the environment, on Spanish housewives' recycling behavior, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 42, 2797, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00962.x · DOI
  2. Alhassan, 2020, Households' source separation behaviour and solid waste disposal options in Ghana's millennium city, J. Environ. Manag., 259, 110055.1
  3. Almasi, 2019, Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice of the kermanshahi women towards reducing, recycling and reusing of municipal solid waste, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 141, 329, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.017 · DOI
  4. Almulhim, 2022, Household's awareness and participation in sustainable electronic waste management practices in Saudi Arabia, Ain Shams Eng. J., 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101729 · DOI
  5. Ao, 2022, Identifying the driving factors of rural residents' household waste classification behavior: evidence from Sichuan, China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106159 · DOI
  6. Arı, 2016, A proposed structural model for housewives' recycling behavior: a case study from Turkey, Ecol. Econ., 129, 132, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.002 · DOI
  7. Botetzagias, 2015, Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: the role of moral norms and of demographic predictors, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 95, 58, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004 · DOI
  8. Boulet, 2022, Influencing across multiple levels: the positive effect of a school-based intervention on food waste and household behaviours, J. Environ. Manag., 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114681 · DOI
  9. Chen, 2010, The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers' recycling intentions, Environ. Behav., 42, 824, 10.1177/0013916509352833 · DOI
  10. Chen, 2014, Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers' intention to visit green hotels, Int. J. Hospit. Manag., 36, 221, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Chen, 2020, Carbon emissions under different domestic waste treatment modes induced by garbage classification: case study in pilot communities in Shanghai, China, Sci. Total Environ., 717, 137193, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137193 · DOI
  12. Conner, 1998, Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 28, 1429, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Coşkun, 2020, What influences consumer food waste behavior in restaurants? An application of the extended theory of planned behavior, Waste Manag., 117, 170, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.011 · DOI
  14. Dixit, 2016, Towards improved understanding of reverse logistics – examining mediating role of return intention, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 107, 115, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.021 · DOI
  15. Echegaray, 2017, Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 180, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.064 · DOI · Paper page
  16. El-Gilany, 2017, Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of ‘teaching laboratory’technicians towards laboratory safety and waste management: a pilot interventional study, J. Hosp. Infect., 96, 192, 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.007 · DOI
  17. ElHaffar, 2020, Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: a narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions, J. Clean. Prod., 122556, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556 · DOI
  18. Fan, 2019, A comparison study of ‘motivation–intention–behavior' model on household solid waste sorting in China and Singapore, J. Clean. Prod., 211, 442, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.168 · DOI
  19. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, J. Market. Res., 24, 337
  20. Guo, 2017, Analysis on carbon dioxide emission reduction during the anaerobic synergetic digestion technology of sludge and kitchen waste: taking kitchen waste synergetic digestion project in Zhenjiang as an example, Waste Manag., 69, 360, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.033 · DOI
  21. Han, 2015, Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior, Tourism Manag., 47, 164, 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014 · DOI
  22. Henderikx, 2017, Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap, Dist. Educ., 38, 353, 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hu, 1999, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Struct. Equ. Model.: A Multidiscip. J., 6, 1, 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hu, 2021, Behavioral change in waste separation at source in an international community: an application of the theory of planned behavior, Waste Manag., 135, 397, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.028 · DOI
  25. Huang, 2014, More than financial investment is needed: food waste recycling pilots in Shanghai, China, J. Clean. Prod., 67, 107, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.019 · DOI
  26. Jack, 2017, A quantitative analysis of attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable parasite control practices from Scottish sheep farmers, Prev. Vet. Med., 139, 134, 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.01.018 · DOI
  27. Karim Ghani, 2013, An application of the theory of planned behaviour to study the influencing factors of participation in source separation of food waste, Waste Manag., 33, 1276, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kelly, 2006, University community responses to on-campus resource recycling, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 47, 42, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.10.002 · DOI
  29. Keramitsoglou, 2013, Public participation in designing a recycling scheme towards maximum public acceptance, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 70, 55, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.015 · DOI
  30. Khan, 2019, Understanding consumers' behavior intentions towards dealing with the plastic waste: perspective of a developing country, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 142, 49, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.020 · DOI
  31. Knussen, 2004, An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: the roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities, J. Environ. Psychol., 24, 237, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kumar, 2012, Theory of planned behaviour approach to understand the purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products, Iima Working Papers
  33. Kumar, 2019, Exploring young adults' e-waste recycling behaviour using an extended theory of planned behaviour model: a cross-cultural study, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 141, 378, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kumar, 2017, Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: a conceptual framework and empirical study, J. Retailing Consum. Serv., 34, 1, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.004 · DOI
  35. Li, 2017, Incentives for food waste diversion: exploration of a long term successful Chinese city residential scheme, J. Clean. Prod., 156, 491, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.198 · DOI
  36. Liang, 2021, Uncovering residents and restaurants’ attitude and willingness toward effective food waste management: a case study of Macau, Waste Manag., 130, 107, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.021 · DOI
  37. Liao, 2018, Psychological and conditional factors influencing staff's takeaway waste separation intention: an application of the extended theory of planned behavior, Sustain. Cities Soc., 41, 186, 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.046 · DOI
  38. Liu, 2017, The influence of social-psychological factors on the intention to choose low-carbon travel modes in tianjin, China, Transport. Res. Part A Policy & Practice, 105, 42, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.004 · DOI
  39. Liu, 2019, Exploring the intention‐behavior gap in the technology acceptance model: a mixed‐methods study in the context of foreign‐language teaching in China, Br. J. Educ. Technol., 50, 2536, 10.1111/bjet.12824 · DOI
  40. Lizin, 2017, Battery pack recycling: behaviour change interventions derived from an integrative theory of planned behaviour study, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 122, 66, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.003 · DOI
  41. Lu, 2019, Sorting out a problem: a co-production approach to household waste management in shanghai, China, Waste Manag., 95, 271, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.020 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Ma, 2018, An analysis of influencing factors on municipal solid waste source-separated collection behavior in Guilin, China by Using the Theory of Planned Behavior, Sustain. Cities Soc., 37, 336, 10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.037 · DOI
  43. Mannocci, 2020, Assessing knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare personnel regarding biomedical waste management: a systematic review of available tools, Waste Manag. Res., 38, 717, 10.1177/0734242X20922590 · DOI
  44. Masud, 2016, Climate change issue and theory of planned behaviour: relationship by empirical evidence, J. Clean. Prod., 113, 613, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.080 · DOI
  45. Matiiuk, 2021, The impact of informational, social, convenience and financial tools on waste sorting behavior: assumptions and reflections of the real situation, J. Environ. Manag., 297, 113323, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113323 · DOI
  46. Meng, 2019, Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents' household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 140, 224, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021 · DOI
  47. Mian, 2017, Municipal solid waste management in China: a comparative analysis, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 19, 1127, 10.1007/s10163-016-0509-9 · DOI
  48. Minelgaitė, 2019, The problem of not waste sorting behaviour, comparison of waste sorters and non-sorters in European Union: cross-cultural analysis, Sci. Total Environ., 672, 174, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.342 · DOI
  49. Pakpour, 2014, Household waste behaviours among a community sample in Iran: an application of the theory of planned behaviour, Waste Manag., 34, 980, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.028 · DOI
  50. Paul, 2022, Identification of solid waste dumping site suitability of Kolkata Metropolitan Area using Fuzzy-AHP model, Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 100030, 10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100030 · DOI
  51. Quaglione, 2017, Exploring additional determinants of energy-saving behaviour: the influence of individuals' participation in cultural activities, Energy Pol., 108, 503, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.030 · DOI
  52. Razali, 2020, Waste separation at source behaviour among Malaysian households: the Theory of Planned Behaviour with moral norm, J. Clean. Prod., 271, 122025, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122025 · DOI
  53. Saphores, 2012, Willingness to engage in a pro-environmental behavior: an analysis of e-waste recycling based on a national survey of US households, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 60, 49, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Shi, 2021, Investigating intention and behaviour towards sorting household waste in Chinese rural and urban–rural integration areas, J. Clean. Prod., 298, 126827, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126827 · DOI
  55. Song, 2012, Residents' behaviors, attitudes, and willingness to pay for recycling e-waste in Macau, J. Environ. Manag., 106, 8, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.036 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Tonglet, 2004, Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 41, 191, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001 · DOI
  57. van den Broek, 2019, Drivers of energy saving behaviour: the relative influence of intentional, normative, situational and habitual processes, Energy Pol., 132, 811, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.048 · DOI
  58. Wan, 2014, The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 83, 141, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.009 · DOI
  59. Wan, 2017, Experiential and instrumental attitudes: interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention, J. Environ. Psychol., 50, 69, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.02.006 · DOI
  60. Wang, 2016, Antecedents of urban residents' separate collection intentions for household solid waste and their willingness to pay: evidence from China, J. Clean. Prod., 173, 256, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.223 · DOI
  61. Wang, 2018, Analysis of factors influencing residents' habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models: egoism or altruism?, Energy Pol., 116, 68, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.055 · DOI
  62. Wang, 2019, Information publicity and resident's waste separation behavior: an empirical study based on the norm activation model, Waste Manag., 87, 33, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.038 · DOI
  63. Wang, 2020, An empirical study of consumers' intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model, Transportation, 47, 397, 10.1007/s11116-018-9893-4 · DOI
  64. Wang, 2020, Engagement factors for waste sorting in China: the mediating effect of satisfaction, J. Clean. Prod., 267, 122046, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122046 · DOI
  65. Wang, 2020, From intention to behavior: comprehending residents' waste sorting intention and behavior formation process, Waste Manag., 113, 41, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.031 · DOI
  66. Wang, 2021, Participate or not: impact of information intervention on residents' willingness of sorting municipal solid waste, J. Clean. Prod., 318, 128591, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128591 · DOI
  67. White, 2012, The role of self-perceptions in the prediction of household recycling behavior in Australia, Environ. Behav., 44, 785, 10.1177/0013916511408069 · DOI
  68. Wright, 2008, Online survey research: can response factors be improved?, J. Internet Commer., 7, 253, 10.1080/15332860802067730 · DOI
  69. Xia, 2021, Understanding waste sorting behavior and key influencing factors through internet of things: evidence from college student community, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 174, 105775, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105775 · DOI
  70. Xu, 2016, Perceived key elements of a successful residential food waste sorting program in urban apartments: stakeholder views, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 362, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.107 · DOI
  71. Xu, 2017, External influences on forming residents' waste separation behaviour: evidence from households in Hangzhou, China, Habitat Int., 63, 21, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.009 · DOI
  72. Yan, 2022, Comprehensive experimental study on energy conversion of household kitchen waste via integrated hydrothermal carbonization and supercritical water gasification, Energy, 242, 123054, 10.1016/j.energy.2021.123054 · DOI
  73. Yang, 2019, Which group should policies target? Effects of incentive policies and product cognitions for electric vehicle adoption among Chinese consumers, Energy Pol., 135, 111009, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111009 · DOI
  74. Yeh, 2021, Reinterpreting the theory of planned behavior and its application to green hotel consumption intention, Int. J. Hospit. Manag., 94, 102827, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102827 · DOI
  75. Yin, 2014, Survey and analysis of consumers' behaviour of waste mobile phone recycling in China, J. Clean. Prod., 65, 517, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Zabala, 2021, Quantitative analysis of robot gesticulation behavior, Aut. Robots, 45, 175, 10.1007/s10514-020-09958-1 · DOI
  77. Zelenika, 2018, Toward zero waste events: reducing contamination in waste streams with volunteer assistance, Waste Manag., 76, 39, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.030 · DOI
  78. Zhang, 2016, What keeps Chinese from recycling: accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior. Resources, Conserv. Recycl., 109, 176, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.008 · DOI
  79. Zhang, 2017, College students' municipal solid waste source separation behavior and its influential factors: a case study in Beijing, China, J. Clean. Prod., 164, 444, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.224 · DOI
  80. Zhang, 2017, Determinants and implications of citizens' environmental complaint in China: integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model, J. Clean. Prod., 166, 148, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.020 · DOI
  81. Zhang, 2020, Understanding Chinese residents' waste classification from a perspective of intention–behavior gap, Sustainability, 12, 4135, 10.3390/su12104135 · DOI
  82. Zhang, 2021, Determinants affecting residents' waste classification intention and behavior: a study based on TPB and ABC methodology, J. Environ. Manag., 290, 112591, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591 · DOI
  83. Zhang, 2022, What determines urban household intention and behavior of solid waste separation? A case study in China, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 93, 106728, 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106728 · DOI
  84. Zheng, 2020, Evolutionary process of household waste separation behavior based on social networks, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 161, 105009, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105009 · DOI
  85. Zviran, 2006, User satisfaction from commercial web sites: the effect of design and use, Inf. Manag., 43, 157, 10.1016/j.im.2005.04.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Govindan, K., Zhuang, Y., & Chen, G.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
349
Pages
131126
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131126
Cited by
134
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review