CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 415Environmental Education and SustainabilityWaste Management and RecyclingMunicipal Solid Waste Management

An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities

Knussen, Christina, Yule, Fred, MacKenzie, Julie, Wells, Mark·2004·Journal of Environmental Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.001

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TPB provides a good account of behavioural intentions to engage in household recycling.

    “Indeed, a number of studies have demonstrated that, on the whole, the TPB provides a good account of behavioural intentions to engage in household recycling (e.g., Knussen, Yule, MacKenzie, & Wells, 2004;Mannetti, Pierro, & Livi, 2004;Terry, Hogg, & White, 1999).”

    From Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms (2009) · cites this paper as Knussen, Yule, MacKenzie, & Wells, 2004

  • Studies have demonstrated the importance of self-identity, perceived availability of recycling facilities, and group norms and social identity in household recycling.

    “In addition, these studies have demonstrated the importance of a number of other variables including self-identity (Mannetti et al., 2004;Terry et al., 1999), perceived availability of recycling facilities (Knussen et al., 2004), and group norms and social identity (Terry et al., 1999).”

    From Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms (2009) · cites this paper as Knussen et al., 2004

  • In both studies, PBC was the strongest predictor of intentions to recycle.

    “In both studies, PBC was the strongest predictor of intentions to recycle, a finding that is consistent with recent research (Barr, 2007;Knussen et al., 2004).”

    From Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms (2009) · cites this paper as Knussen et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J., & Wells, M.
Affiliations
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • Scottish Environment Protection Agency (GB)
Corresponding author
Knussen, Christina
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
237-246
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.001
OpenAlex
W2054097151
Cited by
415
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
26.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
household recycling, recycling intention, theory of planned behavior, past behavior, recycling facilities, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, social environment, Glasgow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review