Cited by 330Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesSustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Exploring young adults' e-waste recycling behaviour using an extended theory of planned behaviour model: a cross-cultural study

Kumar, Anita·2019·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.013

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, A.
Affiliations
Coventry University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Anita
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
141
Pages
378-389
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901948221
Cited by
330
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
19.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
e-waste recycling, young adults, recycling behavior, extended theory of planned behavior, cross-cultural comparison, sense of duty, perceived control, subjective norms, attitudes, personal responsibility, convenience, reverse supply chain management, emerging markets, China, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review