CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unpacking ecosystem dynamics in the construction industry: The transition toward circular construction ecosystems

Havinga, Fynn, Mahdad, Maral, Dolfsma, Wilfred·2023·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137455
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137455

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Orchestration mechanism conceptual framework (authors own).
Fig. 1 Orchestration mechanism conceptual framework (authors own).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Partner alignment within project-based and product-based construction.
Fig. 2 Partner alignment within project-based and product-based construction.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Ecosystem orchestration mechanisms in the product- and project-based ecosystem (authors own).
Fig. 3 Ecosystem orchestration mechanisms in the product- and project-based ecosystem (authors own).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, 2017, Network management in the era of ecosystems: systematic review and management framework, Ind. Market. Manag., 67, 23, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.010 · DOI
  2. Adner, 2017, Ecosystem as structure, J. Manag., 43, 39
  3. Adner, 2010, Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations, Strat. Manag. J., 31, 306, 10.1002/smj.821 · DOI
  4. af Hällström, 2021, The role of social ties in collaborative project networks: a tale of two construction cases, Construct. Manag. Econ., 39, 723, 10.1080/01446193.2021.1949740 · DOI
  5. Autio, 2013, Innovation ecosystems, Res. Technol. Manag., 57
  6. Boddy, 2000, Implementing collaboration between organizations: an empirical study of supply chain partnering, J. Manag. Stud., 37, 1003, 10.1111/1467-6486.00214 · DOI
  7. Brown, 2021, A process model for collaboration in circular oriented innovation, J. Clean. Prod., 286, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125499 · DOI
  8. Carbonara, 2020, The role of public private partnerships in fostering innovation, Construct. Manag. Econ., 38, 140, 10.1080/01446193.2019.1610184 · DOI
  9. Clark, 1989, Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development, Manag. Sci., 35, 1247, 10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1247 · DOI
  10. Decoteau, 2017, The AART of ethnography: a critical realist explanatory research model, J. Theor. Soc. Behav., 47, 58, 10.1111/jtsb.12107 · DOI
  11. Dubois, 2000, Supply strategy and network effects - purchasing behaviour in the construction industry, Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag., 6, 207, 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00016-2 · DOI
  12. Dubois, 2002, The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation, Construct. Manag. Econ., 20, 621, 10.1080/01446190210163543 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dyer, 1998, The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, Acad. Manag. Rev., 23, 660, 10.2307/259056 · DOI
  14. Eastman, 2008, Relative productivity in the AEC industries in the United States for on-site and off-site activities, J. Construct. Eng. Manag., 134, 517, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(517) · DOI
  15. Eccles, 1981, Bureaucratic versus craft administration: the relationship of market structure to the construction firm, Adm. Sci. Q., 449, 10.2307/2392517 · DOI
  16. Emanuela, 2005, Strategic alliances and models of collaboration, Manag. Decis., 43, 123, 10.1108/00251740510572533 · DOI
  17. Eriksson, 2015, Developing routines in large inter-organisational projects: a case study of an infrastructure megaproject, Construction Economics and Building, 15, 4, 10.5130/AJCEB.v15i3.4601 · DOI
  18. Gawer, 2014, Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation, J. Prod. Innovat. Manag., 31, 417, 10.1111/jpim.12105 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Goldkuhl, 2010, Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: toward multi-grounded theory, Int. J. Qual. Methods, 9, 187, 10.1177/160940691000900205 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Granovetter, 1985, Economic action and social the problem of embeddedness, Am. J. Sociol., 91, 481, 10.1086/228311 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Håkansson, 2013, Industrial renewal within the construction network, Construct. Manag. Econ., 31, 40, 10.1080/01446193.2012.737470 · DOI
  22. Handfield, 2006, Avoid the pitfalls in supplier development, Supply Chains and Total Product Systems: Read, 58, 25
  23. Harala, 2023, Industrial ecosystem renewal towards circularity to achieve the benefits of reuse-Learning from circular construction, J. Clean. Prod., 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135885 · DOI
  24. Hart, 2019, Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment, Procedia CIRP, 80, 619, 10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015 · DOI
  25. Hedborg, 2020, Developing a neighbourhood: exploring construction projects from a project ecology perspective, Construct. Manag. Econ., 38, 964, 10.1080/01446193.2020.1805479 · DOI
  26. Herriott, 1983, Multisite qualitative policy research: optimizing description and generalizability, Educ. Res., 12, 14, 10.3102/0013189X012002014 · DOI
  27. Hilbolling, 2021, Sustaining complement quality for digital product platforms: a case study of the Philips Hue ecosystem, J. Prod. Innovat. Manag., 38, 21, 10.1111/jpim.12555 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Hillman, 2009, Resource dependence theory: a review, J. Manag., 35, 1404
  29. Hobday, 2000, The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?, Res. Pol., 29, 871, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4 · DOI
  30. Iansiti, 2004, Strategy as ecology, Harv. Bus. Rev., 82, 68
  31. Jacobides, 2006, Benefiting from innovation: value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures, Res. Pol., 35, 1200, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.005 · DOI
  32. Jansen, 2012, Defining software ecosystems: a survey of software platforms and business network governance, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 879, 41
  33. Jeong, 2006, Supply chain analysis and modeling for the manufactured housing industry, J. Urban Plann. Dev., 132, 1, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:1(1) · DOI
  34. Jones, 1998, Professional service constellations: how strategies and capabilities influence collaborative stability and change, Organ. Sci., 9, 396, 10.1287/orsc.9.3.396 · DOI
  35. Kapoor, 2018, Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation, J. Organ Dysfunct., 7, 12
  36. Kapoor, 2013, Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: how organizational forms shape new technology investments, Strat. Manag. J., 34, 274, 10.1002/smj.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Keegan, 2002, The management of innovation in project-based firms, Long. Range Plan., 35, 367, 10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00069-9 · DOI
  38. Kesidou, 2019, Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: a critical interdisciplinary review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 113, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109274 · DOI
  39. Laan, 2011, Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 4, 660, 10.1108/17538371111164065 · DOI
  40. MacCormack, 2012, Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: a test of the ‘mirroring’ hypothesis, Res. Pol., 41, 1309, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.011 · DOI
  41. Martinsuo, 2018, Change program management: toward a capability for managing value-oriented, integrated multi-project change in its context, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 36, 134, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.018 · DOI
  42. Moore, 1993, Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition, Harv. Bus. Rev., 71, 75
  43. Nam, 1988, Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology, Construct. Manag. Econ., 6, 133, 10.1080/01446198800000012 · DOI
  44. Orlikowski, 1993, CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development, MIS Q., 309, 10.2307/249774 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Pan, 2008, Leading UK housebuilders' utilization of offsite construction methods, Build. Res. Inf., 36, 56, 10.1080/09613210701204013 · DOI
  46. Papadopoulos, 2016, Supply chain improvement in construction industry, Universal Journal of Management, 4, 528, 10.13189/ujm.2016.041002 · DOI
  47. Parida, 2019, Orchestrating industrial ecosystem in circular economy: a two-stage transformation model for large manufacturing companies, J. Bus. Res., 101, 715, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Parker, 2012, Knowledge acquisition and leakage in inter‐firm relationships involving new technology‐based firms, Manag. Decis., 50, 1618, 10.1108/00251741211266714 · DOI
  49. Pulkka, 2016, Applicability and benefits of the ecosystem concept in the construction industry, Construct. Manag. Econ., 34, 129, 10.1080/01446193.2016.1179773 · DOI
  50. Quintana-García, 2004, Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms, Technovation, 24, 927, 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00060-9 · DOI
  51. Rao, 2002, Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 22, 632, 10.1108/01443570210427668 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Rietveld, 2019, Platform strategy: managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements, Organ. Sci., 30, 1232, 10.1287/orsc.2019.1290 · DOI
  53. Slaughter, 2000, Implementation of construction innovations, Build. Res. Inf., 28, 2, 10.1080/096132100369055 · DOI
  54. Tam, 2007, Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction, Build. Environ., 42, 3642, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.003 · DOI
  55. Taylor, 2004, Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries, Innovations: Project Management Research, 17
  56. Thomas, 2014, Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context, Acad. Manag. Perspect., 28, 198, 10.5465/amp.2011.0105 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Thomas, 2014, The fifth facet: the ecosystem as an organizational field, Acad. Manag. Proc., 1
  58. Ulrich, 1995, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Res. Pol., 24, 419, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3 · DOI
  59. Valkokari, 2017, Orchestrating innovation ecosystems: a qualitative analysis of ecosystem positioning strategies, Technology Innovation Management Review, 7, 12, 10.22215/timreview/1061 · DOI
  60. Vosman, 2023, Collaboration and innovation beyond project boundaries: exploring the potential of an ecosystem perspective in the infrastructure sector, Construct. Manag. Econ., 1
  61. Walrave, 2018, A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 136, 103, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011 · DOI
  62. Wang, 2008, Innovation in product architecture - a study of the Chinese automobile industry, Asia Pac. J. Manag., 25, 509, 10.1007/s10490-007-9084-x · DOI
  63. Watts, 1993, Supplier development programs: an empirical analysis, Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manag., 29, 10
  64. Wen, 2015, Quantitative assessment of industrial symbiosis for the promotion of circular economy: a case study of the printed circuit boards industry in China's Suzhou New District, J. Clean. Prod., 90, 211, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.041 · DOI
  65. Wielopolski, 2022, The better building initiative—a collaborative ecosystem involving all stakeholders as catalyst to accelerate the adoption of circular economy innovations in the construction sector, Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1
  66. Williamson, 1991, Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives, Adm. Sci. Q., 269, 10.2307/2393356 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Williamson, 2012, Ecosystem advantage: how to successfully harness the power of partners, Calif. Manag. Rev., 55, 24, 10.1525/cmr.2012.55.1.24 · DOI
  68. Winch, 1998, Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction, Build. Res. Inf., 26, 268, 10.1080/096132198369751 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Yang, 2014, Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model, Build. Environ., 73, 208, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014 · DOI
  70. Yang, 2016, Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 34, 66, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.010 · DOI
  71. Zhao, 2012, An empirical study of knowledge transfer in working relationships with suppliers in new product development, Int. J. Innovat. Manag., 16
  72. Zsidisin, 2003, An agency theory investigation of supply risk management, J. Supply Chain Manag., 39, 15, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2003.tb00156.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Havinga, F., Mahdad, M., & Dolfsma, W.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
414
Pages
137455
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137455
Cited by
25
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review