CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The member wears Four Hats: A member identification framework for co-operative enterprises

Mamouni Limnios, Elena, Mazzarol, Tim, Soutar, Geoffrey N., Siddique, Kadambot H.·2018·Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management
DOI 10.1016/j.jcom.2018.03.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcom.2018.03.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Österberg, 2009, Members' perception of their participation in the governance of cooperatives: The key to trust and commitment in agricultural cooperatives, Agribusiness, 25, 181, 10.1002/agr.20200 · DOI
  2. Allen, 1990, Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers' commitment and role orientation, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 847, 10.2307/256294 · DOI
  3. Allen, 1990, The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1, 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x · DOI
  4. Anderson, 2006, Customer value propositions in business markets, Harvard Business Review, 84, 91
  5. Arcas-Lario, 2003, Co-ordination and performance of Spanish second-level agricultural co-operatives: The impact of relationship characteristics, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30, 487, 10.1093/erae/30.4.487 · DOI
  6. Ashforth, 1989, Social identity theory and the organisation, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20, 10.2307/258189 · DOI
  7. Beverland, 2007, Can cooperatives brand? Exploring the interplay between cooperative structure and sustained brand marketing success, Food Policy, 32, 480, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.10.004 · DOI
  8. Bhuyan, 2007, The people factor in cooperatives: An analysis of members' attitudes and behavior, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 55, 275, 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00092.x · DOI
  9. Bijman, 2011, Member or customer? Farmer commitment to supply cooperatives, International conference on the Economics and Management of Networks
  10. Birchall, 2004, What motivates members to participate in co-operative and mutual businesses?, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75, 465, 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00259.x · DOI
  11. Birchall, 2007, The role and potential of co-operatives in the poverty reduction process: A research agenda, Journal of Co-operative Studies, 40, 43
  12. Brewin, 2008, The evolution of grain trading organizations in Australia: Applying the cooperative life cycle, current agriculture, food & resource issues, Journal of the Canadian Agricultural Economics Society, 9, 9
  13. Byrne, 2005, An analysis of the credit union's use of craig's commitment building measures, Journal of Co-operative Studies, 38, 20
  14. Byrne, 2014, Value proposition preferences of credit union members and patronage activity, The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 32, 567, 10.1108/IJBM-11-2013-0128 · DOI
  15. Chaddad, 2004, Understanding new cooperative models: An ownership–control rights typology, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 26, 348
  16. Chaddad, 2013, Control rights, governance, and the costs of ownership in agricultural cooperatives, Agribusiness, 29, 3, 10.1002/agr.21328 · DOI
  17. Cicognani, 2012, Social identification and sense of community among members of a cooperative company: The role of perceived organizational values, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1088, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00878.x · DOI
  18. Cook, 2004, Redesigning cooperative boundaries: The emergence of new models, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 1249, 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00673.x · DOI
  19. Cook, 2006, Collective entrepreneurship: An emerging phenomenon in producer-Owned organizations, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 38, 421, 10.1017/S1074070800022458 · DOI
  20. Cook, 1995, The future of US agricultural cooperatives: A neo-institutional approach, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 1153, 10.2307/1243338 · DOI
  21. Edwards, 2005, Reframing agribusiness: Moving from farm to market centric, Journal of Agribusiness, 23, 57
  22. Eisenhardt, 2007, Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25, 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Eisenhardt, 1989, Building theory from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 14, 532, 10.2307/258557 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Fehr, 1999, A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817, 10.1162/003355399556151 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Folger, 1996, Distributive and procedural justice: Multi-faceted meanings and interrelations, Social Justice Research, 9, 395, 10.1007/BF02196992 · DOI
  26. Foreman, 2002, Members' identification with multiple-identity organizations, Organization Science, 13, 618, 10.1287/orsc.13.6.618.493 · DOI
  27. Fulton, 1993, Factors that influence the commitment of members to their cooperative organization, Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 8
  28. Fulton, 2001, Organizational commitment in a mixed oligopoly: Agricultural cooperatives and investor-owned firms, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 1258, 10.1111/0002-9092.00276 · DOI
  29. Fulton, 1999, Cooperatives and member commitment, The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 4, 418
  30. Gremler, 2004, The critical incident technique in service research, Journal of Service Research, 7, 65, 10.1177/1094670504266138 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Gupta, 2014, The co-operative model as a ‘living experiment in democracy’, Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 2, 98, 10.1016/j.jcom.2014.09.002 · DOI
  32. Hendrikse, 2002, Ownership structure in agrifood chains: The marketing cooperative, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 104, 10.1111/1467-8276.00246 · DOI
  33. Hernández-Espallardo, 2013, Farmers' satisfaction and intention to continue membership in agricultural marketing co-operatives: Neoclassical versus transaction cost considerations, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40, 239, 10.1093/erae/jbs024 · DOI
  34. Homburg, 2009, Social identity and the service-profit chain, Journal of Marketing, 73, 38, 10.1509/jmkg.73.2.38 · DOI
  35. James, 2005, Property right and organizational characteristics of producer-owned firms and organizational trust, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 76, 545-580, 10.1111/j.1370-4788.2005.00289.x · DOI
  36. Johnson, 2008, Reinventing your business model, Harvard Business Review, 86, 50
  37. Jussila, 2012, Affective commitment in co-operative organizations: What makes members want to stay?, International Business Research, 5, 1, 10.5539/ibr.v5n10p1 · DOI
  38. Kanter, 1968, Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities, American Sociological Review, 33, 499, 10.2307/2092438 · DOI
  39. Lang, 1995, The future of agricultural cooperatives in Canada and the United States: Discussion, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 1162, 10.2307/1243340 · DOI
  40. LeVay, 1983, Agricultural co-operative theory: A review, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 34, 1, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1983.tb00973.x · DOI
  41. Levi, 2008, Cooperatives as the “enfants terribles” of economics: Some implications for the social economy, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 2178, 10.1016/j.socec.2008.06.003 · DOI
  42. Levi, 1997, A new look at the embeddedness/disembeddedness issue: Cooperatives as terms of reference, Journal of Socio-Economics, 26, 159
  43. Liesch, 2011, The evolution of the international business field: A scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal, Scientometrics, 1, 17, 10.1007/s11192-011-0372-3 · DOI
  44. Lusch, 2006, Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements, Marketing Theory, 6, 281, 10.1177/1470593106066781 · DOI
  45. Lusch, 2011, Service-dominant logic: A necessary step, European Journal of Marketing, 45, 1298, 10.1108/03090561111137723 · DOI
  46. McClintock-Stoel, 2004, Group identification: The influence of group membership on retail hardware cooperative members' perceptions, Journal of Small Business Management, 42, 155, 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00103.x · DOI
  47. McMillan, 1986, Sense of community: A definition and theory, Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6, 10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  48. Mikami, 2010, Capital procurement of a consumer cooperative: Role of the membership market, Economic Systems, 34, 178, 10.1016/j.ecosys.2009.09.004 · DOI
  49. Nelson, 2016, Emergent identity formation and the co-operative: Theory building in relation to alternative organizational forms, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28, 286, 10.1080/08985626.2016.1155744 · DOI
  50. Nilsson, 1999, Co-operative organisational models as reflections of the business environments, The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 4, 449
  51. Nilsson, 2001, Organisational principles for co-operative firms, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17, 329, 10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00010-0 · DOI
  52. Novkovic, 2008, Defining the co-operative difference, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 2168, 10.1016/j.socec.2008.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Oczkowski, 2013, The meaning, importance and practice of the co-operative principles: Qualitative evidence from the Australian co-operative sector, Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 1, 54, 10.1016/j.jcom.2013.10.006 · DOI
  54. Palmer, 2000, A behavioural analysis of co-operative marketing organisations?, Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 273, 10.1362/026725700785100415 · DOI
  55. Palmer, 2002, Cooperative marketing associations: An investigation into the causes of effectiveness, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 10, 135, 10.1080/09652540210125288 · DOI
  56. Pascucci, 2012, Some like to join, others to deliver: An econometric analysis of farmers' relationships with agricultural co-operatives, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39, 51, 10.1093/erae/jbr027 · DOI
  57. Peredo, 2006, Toward a theory of community-based enterprise, Academy of Management Review, 31, 309, 10.5465/amr.2006.20208683 · DOI
  58. Plunkett, 2010, Ownership structure and incentives to invest: Dual-structured irrigation cooperatives in Australia, Journal of Institutional Economics, 6, 261, 10.1017/S1744137409990361 · DOI
  59. Rawls, 1958, Justice as fairness, The Philosophical Review, 67, 164, 10.2307/2182612 · DOI
  60. Rebelo, 2002, Economic role, property rights, labour skills and technology in the portuguese wine co-operatives, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73, 111, 10.1111/1467-8292.00188 · DOI
  61. Söderlund, 2002, Customer satisfaction and its influence on different behavioural intention constructs, Journal of Customer Behaviour, 1, 145, 10.1362/14753920260595192 · DOI
  62. Scott, 2000, A stakeholder approach to organizational identity, Academy of Management Review, 25, 43, 10.2307/259262 · DOI
  63. Smith, 2006, Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping, Behavior Research Methods, 38, 262, 10.3758/BF03192778 · DOI
  64. Sweeney, 2001, Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale, Journal of Retailing, 77, 203, 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Talonen, 2016, Consumer cooperatives: Uncovering the value potential of customer ownership, AMS Review, 6, 142, 10.1007/s13162-016-0083-2 · DOI
  66. Trechter, 2002, Using communications to influence member commitment in cooperatives, Journal of Cooperatives, 17, 14
  67. Van Oorschot, 2013, The three pillars of the co-operative, Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 1, 64, 10.1016/j.jcom.2013.10.002 · DOI
  68. Vargo, 2004, Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing, The Journal of Marketing, 68, 1, 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Vargo, 2008, Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1, 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Vitaliano, 1983, Cooperative enterprise: An alternative conceptual basis for analyzing a complex institution, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65, 1078, 10.2307/1240424 · DOI
  71. Warbasse, 1937, Basic principles of cooperation, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 191, 7, 10.1177/000271623719100103 · DOI
  72. Wirtz, 2016, Business model innovation: Development, concept and future research directions, Journal of Business Models, 4, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mamouni Limnios, E., Mazzarol, T., Soutar, G. N., & Siddique, K. H.
Venue
Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
20-33
ISSN
2213-297X
DOI
10.1016/j.jcom.2018.03.003
Cited by
51
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Australian Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review