Cited by 113Corporate Finance and GovernanceCorporate Governance and LawFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

Undoing the powerful anti-takeover force of staggered boards

Open access
Guo, Re-Jin, Kruse, Timothy A., Nohel, Tom·2008·Journal of Corporate Finance

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.007

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, R.-J., Kruse, T. A., & Nohel, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Xavier University (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Nohel, Tom
Venue
Journal of Corporate Finance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
274-288
ISSN
0929-1199 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122503504
Cited by
113
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
27.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Corporate Finance (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Law
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
staggered boards, takeover defenses, shareholder activism, corporate governance, shareholder wealth effects, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, takeover targets, investor reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review