Cited by 202Social and Intergroup PsychologyConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationBehavioral Health and Interventions

Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal‐based framework for attitude certainty

Open access
Rucker, Derek D., Tormala, Zakary L., Petty, Richard E., Briñol, Pablo·2014·Journal of Consumer Psychology

Abstract

This paper explores consumers' commitment to and conviction about their beliefs in the form of attitude certainty. Based on a review of past research, we present a new framework for understanding attitude certainty and how consumers' attitude certainty is shaped by their resisting or yielding to persuasive messages, or even by their reflections on the evidence supporting their attitudes. We propose that attitude certainty is formed and changed largely through an attribution‐based reasoning process linked to a finite set of distinct appraisals. Our framework is used to both organize past research and offer guidance for future research endeavors. In addition, we distinguish our framework of appraisal‐based attitude certainty from past models in attitudes and persuasion research that have referenced or taken note of the attitude certainty construct. Implications and future directions for the study of consumer behavior are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.001

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavioural change occurs when people feel confident about their attitudes.

    “This occurs when people feel confident about their attitudes 155 .”

    From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [155]

    The ‘Attitude Certainty and Attitude Strength’ section says that attitudes held with high certainty are more likely to influence behavior and better predict actual participation. It does not establish that feeling confident about an attitude causes a change in behavior. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  2. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
  3. Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2004). Resistance to Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective. In J. T. Jost, M. R. Banaji & D. A. Prentice (Eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress (pp. 37-51). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
  4. Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S.C., & Bizer, G. (2000). Matching effects in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood analysis (pp. 133-162).
  5. In G. Maio & J. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauerschatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of Retrieval as Information -Another Look at the Availability Heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195-202.
  7. Thompson, M. M., Naccarato, M. E., Parker, K. C. H., & Moskowitz, G. (2001). The Personal Need for Structure (PNS) and Personal Fear of Invalidity (PFI) scales: Historical perspectives, present applications and future directions. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 19-39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rucker, D. D., Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Rucker, Derek D.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-13
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
119-136
ISSN
  • 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7663
OpenAlex
W1992997851
Cited by
202
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 9
FWCI
41.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
attitude certainty, customer commitment, appraisal theory, persuasion, attitude change, consumer beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review