Cited by 781Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsFeminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases

Kruglanski, Arie W.·1989·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-0924-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These mechanisms are best characterized as cognitive-motivational, involving the goal-directed (motivational) use of information processing (cognition).

    “These mechanisms are best characterized as cognitive–motivational, insofar as they involve the goal-directed (motivational) use of information processing (cognition), as described in several classic social psychological theories88,96,97.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruglanski, A. W.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Kruglanski, Arie W.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1989
OpenAlex
W151142268
Cited by
781
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI
42.93
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
human knowledge, epistemology, lay knowledge, epistemic motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review