Cited by 403COVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Causal impact of masks, policies, behavior on early COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S

Open access
Chernozhukov, Victor, Kasahara, Hiroyuki, Schrimpf, Paul·2021·Journal of Econometrics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The paper evaluates the dynamic impact of various policies adopted by US states on the growth rates of confirmed Covid-19 cases and deaths as well as social distancing behavior measured by Google Mobility Reports, where we take into consideration people’s voluntarily behavioral response to new information of transmission risks in a causal structural model framework. Our analysis finds that both policies and information on transmission risks are important determinants of Covid-19 cases and deaths and shows that a change in policies explains a large fraction of observed changes in social distancing behavior. Our main counterfactual experiments suggest that nationally mandating face masks for employees early in the pandemic could have reduced the weekly growth rate of cases and deaths by more than 10 percentage points in late April and could have led to as much as 19 to 47 percent less deaths nationally by the end of May, which roughly translates into 19 to 47 thousand saved lives. We also find that, without stay-at-home orders, cases would have been larger by 6 to 63 percent and without business closures, cases would have been larger by 17 to 78 percent. We find considerable uncertainty over the effects of school closures due to lack of cross-sectional variation; we could not robustly rule out either large or small effects. Overall, substantial declines in growth rates are attributable to private behavioral response, but policies played an important role as well. We also carry out sensitivity analyses to find neighborhoods of the models under which the results hold robustly: the results on mask policies appear to be much more robust than the results on business closures and stay-at-home orders. Finally, we stress that our study is observational and therefore should be interpreted with great caution. From a completely agnostic point of view, our findings uncover predictive effects (association) of observed policies and behavioral changes on future health outcomes, controlling for informational and other confounding variables.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Alvarez Fernando E. Argente David Lippi Francesco A simple planning problem for covid-19 lockdown Covid Econ. 14 2020 PMC10105532 37360773
  2. Bareinboim E. Correa J.D. Ibeling D. Icard T. On pearl’s hierarchy and the foundations of causal inference 2020 ACM Special Volume in Honor of Judea Pearl (provisional title)
  3. Bartik Alexander Bertrand Marianne Lin Feng Rothstein Jesse Unrath Matthew Measuring the labor market at the onset of the COVID-19 crisis 2020 SSRN, URL https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3633053
  4. Jones Terry C Mühlemann Barbara Veith Talitha Biele Guido Zuchowski Marta Hoffmann Jörg Stein Angela Edelmann Anke Corman Victor Max Drosten Christian An analysis of SARS-cov-2 viral load by patient age 2020 medRxiv. URL https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/09/2020.06.08.20125484
  5. Kovacs Roxanne Dunaiski Maurice Tukiainen Janne Compulsory face mask policies do not affect community mobility in Germany 2020 SSRN. URL https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3620070
  6. Lee Seungjae Kim Tark Lee Eunjung Lee Cheolgu Kim Hojung Rhee Heejeong Park Se Yoon Son Hyo-Ju Yu Shinae Park Jung Wan Choo Eun Ju Park Suyeon Loeb Mark Kim Tae Hyong Clinical course and molecular viral shedding among asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a community treatment center in the Republic of Korea JAMA Intern. Med. 2020 URL 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3862 PMC7411944 32780793 · DOI
  7. Pearl Judea Causality 2009 Cambridge University Press
  8. Pei Sen Kandula Sasikiran Shaman Jeffrey Differential effects of intervention timing on COVID-19 spread in the United States 2020 medRxiv. URL https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/20/2020.05.15.20103655 PMC7821895 33158911

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chernozhukov, V., Kasahara, H., & Schrimpf, P.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Kasahara, Hiroyuki
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
220
Issue
1
Pages
23-62
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124772395
Cited by
403
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 37
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mask mandates, stay-at-home orders, business closures, school closures, Google Mobility Reports, policy evaluation, counterfactual analysis, COVID-19 mortality, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review